![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
Who, exactly, is up for an extension right away?
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,022
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
I would wait on Landry. I wouldnt extend Cooley, in fact I may look to transition Fred Davis into the spot this year depending on play and extend Davis before the season starts. I would wait on Carriker like Landry until after this season. I would ask Fletch what he wants and then look to make that happen.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
I'd resign and or trade both Cooley and Davis and keep Logan Paulson. I'd let Moss go. Keep Rhabach at Center. I'd cut Torain and Williams and use the new draft pick. ;o
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
Go to the corner and think about what you've just done.
__________________
http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
LOL. I just think its funny seeing people either wanting to trade Cooley or Davis. For the life of me I can't figure out why we can't keep both? Cooley is a HOFer and there is no reason to let him go, and Davis has (to me) equal talent so there is no reason to get rid of him either. Give them shift work..... every 2 or 3 plays change out, or better yet give each 2 quarters and mix them up.... whoever appears to be having the better day let the finish the 4th quarter.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
Quote:
That being said I think that Fred has a lot of ability that he doesn't get to show often enough. Hell even Cooley didn't get the same opportunities in the offense that he had previously. It's more about not really having much need for 2 pass catching TEs unless they want to split Davis or Cooley out wide more frequently. Why waste talent? It's better to get a pick from it rather than not get the potential out of the player. I'd love to keep both but I'd have to see them utilized a bit more, especially Davis.
__________________
http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,765
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
Quote:
He hasn't even had a single 1000 yard season or much less has he had a 10 TD season. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
I'd prefer to keep Cooley & Davis too. Seems that all we hear every offseason now is this silly trade Cooley talk. He's only 29 and still very productive, no reason why he can't keep playing at a high level for another 4-5 seasons. Keep them both, and find a way to get Davis more involved.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
Quote:
I think it's patently ridiculous that no offensive mind has figured out how to use two TEs at the same time to maximize the talent on our roster, but I just don't see it being any different this year.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout
maybe we are not looking at this in the same manner, when your tight end is the second most targeted player on the team and your second tight end has just over half the catches as a backup running back and only 1 more than your fullback that's not exactly a duo to me
__________________
http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|