![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
Quote:
Signing a guy in Moss who just turned 32 a month ago who's coming off an 1100+ yard 93 catch season (in a bad offense with no consistent QB play) to a 3 year deal certainly isn't "nuttery." The numbers just have to be right. He's no long-term answer, but it's more reasonable than inking a significantly larger deal for a WR in Holmes who really won't be any better than Moss with our QB situation over the next 2 or so seasons and will bring significant character issues to boot.
__________________
Tardy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
Quote:
Moss's stats were precisely inflated because he was one of the few "good" offensive players at the offense's disposal, and thus became the default target. But Moss's game is based on his speed, and that fading away fast. Thus, his days as the de facto #1 are nearly gone. A 3-year deal for him would have to be like Larry Johnson's: one that is easy to cut him should he not prove effective anymore. It doesn't matter if we sign Holmes or not. Any long-term deal for Moss needs to realistically weigh how much he can contribute to WINS in the future. Usually unless the WR is headed for the HOF, WRs hit their wall at around 33 or 34. Quite frankly, I'd pass on both. We have little need for short-term(Moss) or mid-term(Holmes) players. We need to focus on getting long-term or "eternal-term" players
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
I have heard all of the reports, but at the same time this new regime is pretty tight on the information that comes out. Last year we were connected to alot of the top guys to only find out later that we were never even at the bargaining table.
Also why are all of the article pertaining to the Redskins still going with the Ol' Dan Snyder line? Snyder needs to stay away from player X... Have so many in the media really not checked their stories before sending them to print? There are new cats in charge here.... rant over...
__________________
Just win. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,577
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
The one thing Holmes has going for him is that he's clutch. But is he consistent? That's an entirely different story. And I don't think it's a good idea to sign a guy to a big money contract when he's one strike away from being suspended big time.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 51
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
I have been saying since the word was out we were looking at Holmes that we should stay away from him. He and Moss seem to be the exact same players. Yes Holmes is younger, but Moss has been a great Redskins, had the most productive year of his career last year, and will come a whole hell of a lot cheaper than Holmes. I just dont see where we need to bring him in. Why not let our younger guys play? Armstrong had a decent year. Kelly (often injured) has had a ton of time to heal and learn and if he is healthy, I see him as a HUGE contributer. Terrence Austin is another guy that can use some playing time. And the two rookies we have, Hankerson being one that can start. We need to develop our younger guys and let them play. Its all about the Oline. If they get this shored up and solid, the QB can git these guys and be very productive. Look at the Pats, Saints. THey have a very pass happy offense and have found some very good quality, and some great receivers by letting them go out and play. We NEVER do that. We dont need another big name receiver, we need good Olineman.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
we should look at 2nd tier WRs. moss wants back. the jets are making holmes priority #1... so we should scoop edwards out instead, that way we can still get a guy that can't stay off the police blotter, but at a much friendlier price. Plax could be a steal too :P
honestly, between moss AA cooley and hankerson/fred davis/kelly/austin/etc we can do alright. If we don't have a DL worth two dams or we're missing a starting CB, we won't be winning much. we need at least one BIG upgrade on the OL too, preferably so we ditch rabach. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
Quote:
Speaking of Moss, we could probably get the other Moss cheap also.... imagine the Moss/Moss threat. Say what you will about R.Moss but he's a hard worker and would show the young guys what they need to do to be great. Even if its just for a one year deal. I might even think about T.O. for a 1 yr deal only because he's worth his weight in gold his first yr and he has a great work ethic that our rookies could stand to pick up, then let him go. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
I'm not saying we need Holms, but we do need a #1 WR. Some would say we drafted one, and I would agree and "hope" one works out, but great teams don't go into the season with hope. They go into the season with a plan.
1st- I'd contact whatever OL FA's that are available. 2nd- I'd contact FA CB's in case we let Rogers go. 3rd- I'd look to any other defensive players that could help the team. 4rth- I'd think about picking up a UFDA QB. I know, I know my #4 is a bold statement. But if Grossman is resigned then the team won't be too horrid even if I let Beck start. So I think I'd bring in a young Rookie and try them out. If they didn't work out then next year we still can draft a QB, either trade up or look to FA. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
Ooops, lol, I failed to throw in the fact I'd still contact a WR. Who is out there that are #1's? I think the Junkies mentioned Braylon Edwards, Holmes, and Sidney Rice. They liked the idea of Rice because he's the youngest of the bunch and most physical.
Basically I'd contact the agents of all positions OL, WR, CB, and whatever other defensive positions needed. Its easier to contact the agents and say "hey we are interested come talk to us", most agents know if they can't get a good price out of us they can drive up the cost to other teams by using the Redskins name. So I'm pretty sure if any agents are contacted then players will be holding out until Friday or atleast untill after they talk with the Skins to see what the Skins will pay for them to use against their current team or other interested teams. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
I keep hearing Santonio from basically one source repeated several times, but I hear Rice and Jones from several sources. Not sure which if any are going to happen.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
Quote:
I know people have issue's with the idea of Plax or R.Moss but if reports are true with R.Moss being in tip top shape and if Plax is ready to reprove himself then they would be cheap pick ups and KS's system is a pass happy system which should make them happy to want to come here over other teams who might be more run oriented. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,587
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
Quote:
Smoot knows what's up. A tweet from another insider below. Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
For all I know we're hearing stuff from the same source. I'll say this, the new Redskins have been excellent at smoke screens and misdirections
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,587
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: One man's view of Santonio Holmes and the Skins
Do any of these sources think we'd also resign moss?
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|