Tattoo's

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by mooby

That all depends on where you get it. Using the logic from mine (where they spent about 4 hours working on the top of my shoulder blade) I would assume anywhere they do it where you have no flesh and it's all bone underneath, well that will definitely suck. Biceps is pretty easy though, because you have a lot of flesh that absorbs the pain, if you will. I've talked to enough people to know that getting one done on your ribcage definitely hurts too. That's all I can think of right now. My bro has a couple, one on his left chest, and one on his upper right back area (both pretty small) and he says the one on his chest hurt.

I think it really depends on the number of nerve endings in a given area vs. just being close to bone. Bone in itself has no nerves. For example a really flesh part of your body that hurts like hell if you pinch it is the flesh on the back of your arm near your triceps.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by mredskins

I think it really depends on the number of nerve endings in a given area vs. just being close to bone. Bone in itself has no nerves. For example a really flesh part of your body that hurts like hell if you pinch it is the flesh on the back of your arm near your triceps.

/I'm not a doctor, but I did stay at a motel 6 once.

Seriously though I'm not a doc by any stretch, so this is all based on ideas and opinions, not facts. Alls I know is it hurt like hell when that needle was digging into what felt like the bone at the top of my shoulder. The rest is just opinions. I'm sure with every person it's different, based on a lot of different factors.