Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-20-2012, 11:25 PM   #1
CrustyRedskin
Playmaker
 
CrustyRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 3,062
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
I wonder if Archie knew his wifes uterus was going to be a quarterback factory.
Those two are are so abnormal and im kind of a conspiracy theorist so i got a hunch they were butt babies. Kinda Xmenish.
__________________
Lafayette, we're here.

HTTR. You wern't a bunch of losers on 10-27-14.
CrustyRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 06:08 PM   #2
budw38
Playmaker
 
budw38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern,Va.
Posts: 2,706
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
I wonder if Archie knew his wifes uterus was going to be a quarterback factory.
LOL , maybe a new wing will be in the Pro Football Hall of fame . " This is were Peyton and Eli are from "
budw38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 02:54 PM   #3
HailGreen28
Playmaker
 
HailGreen28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

The legitimacy of the next few seasons for the Giants can be called into question. The cheating Giants owner illegally and unfairly took cap space from 2 out of 3 divisional opponents two straight seasons. And only got away with it because the head of the players union cared more about keeping his job rather than fighting for the players.

Cheaters like Mara and his team don't deserve positive recognition.
HailGreen28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 09:44 PM   #4
Bishop Hammer
Special Teams
 
Bishop Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 323
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

Awww screw the Giants. They win a couple Superbowls recently and now they have big heads.

Why some Skins fans rooted for them in their SB's abainst the Pats is beyond me? No matter how you felt about NE the Giants are division rivals. I don't want them to do well no matter who they play. I dislike NY more than Dallas at this point. Here's hoping the Skins even the series in the rematch.
__________________
I don't have to sell my soul
he's already in me
I don't need to sell my soul
he's already in me
I wanna be adored
I wanna be adored

Stone Roses
"I wanna be adored"
Bishop Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 04:02 PM   #5
REDSKINS4ever
Playmaker
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,114
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

I do agree that the NYG fan base heads have swelled because of those 2 Super Bowl wins over Brady and NE. But they met their match yesterday even though the managed to win the game.
REDSKINS4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 04:26 PM   #6
Giantone
Gamebreaker
 
Giantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,427
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDSKINS4ever View Post
I do agree that the NYG fan base heads have swelled because of those 2 Super Bowl wins over Brady and NE. But they met their match yesterday even though the managed to win the game.

.....and that never would have happen in Washington,ever.
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread.
Giantone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 07:01 PM   #7
REDSKINS4ever
Playmaker
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,114
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giantone View Post
.....and that never would have happen in Washington,ever.
Only if those Washington teams were great 14-2/13-3/12-4 etc. The NYG teams that won Super Bowls 42 & 46 were not great teams. They were 10-6 and 9-7 going into the playoffs those years. Especially the 2011 NYG team that at one point had a 4 game losing streak and a little luck within the post season. Their credibility in the SB comes from already have beaten the Patriots in New England during the regular season that year. But I don't see how a fan base can brag and boast about a lowly above average team that were fortunate to win out. They were nothing like the Saints and Packers in 2011.
REDSKINS4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 07:06 PM   #8
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDSKINS4ever View Post
Only if those Washington teams were great 14-2/13-3/12-4 etc. The NYG teams that won Super Bowls 42 & 46 were not great teams. They were 10-6 and 9-7 going into the playoffs those years. Especially the 2011 NYG team that at one point had a 4 game losing streak and a little luck within the post season. Their credibility in the SB comes from already have beaten the Patriots in New England during the regular season that year. But I don't see how a fan base can brag and boast about a lowly above average team that were fortunate to win out. They were nothing like the Saints and Packers in 2011.
You're really not helping your case here at all.

You want Giants fans to respect our wins in strike shortened years, but you're discrediting their wins by saying they were lucky or didn't have a great W/L record? Makes no sense.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 07:11 PM   #9
REDSKINS4ever
Playmaker
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,114
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
You're really not helping your case here at all.

You want Giants fans to respect our wins in strike shortened years, but you're discrediting their wins by saying they were lucky or didn't have a great W/L record? Makes no sense.
Mattyk, I don't like the Giants and I'm beginning to dislike them more than the Cowboys, believe it or not. You don't live up here in NYC like I do. I don't want and care for their respect. The way they see us is the way I see them.
REDSKINS4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 03:58 PM   #10
Giantone
Gamebreaker
 
Giantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,427
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDSKINS4ever View Post
Only if those Washington teams were great 14-2/13-3/12-4 etc. The NYG teams that won Super Bowls 42 & 46 were not great teams. They were 10-6 and 9-7 going into the playoffs those years. Especially the 2011 NYG team that at one point had a 4 game losing streak and a little luck within the post season. Their credibility in the SB comes from already have beaten the Patriots in New England during the regular season that year. But I don't see how a fan base can brag and boast about a lowly above average team that were fortunate to win out. They were nothing like the Saints and Packers in 2011.

wow, I now understand why you are having problems up in NY,I'm done.
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread.
Giantone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 07:17 AM   #11
REDSKINS4ever
Playmaker
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,114
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giantone View Post
wow, I now understand why you are having problems up in NY,I'm done.
Do you really? The Packers, 49ers, Saints and other NFC playoff teams were indeed good. The NYG on the other hand were lucky.
REDSKINS4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2012, 07:50 AM   #12
coggs
Special Teams
 
coggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: staten island
Age: 49
Posts: 477
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDSKINS4ever View Post
Only if those Washington teams were great 14-2/13-3/12-4 etc. The NYG teams that won Super Bowls 42 & 46 were not great teams. They were 10-6 and 9-7 going into the playoffs those years. Especially the 2011 NYG team that at one point had a 4 game losing streak and a little luck within the post season. Their credibility in the SB comes from already have beaten the Patriots in New England during the regular season that year. But I don't see how a fan base can brag and boast about a lowly above average team that were fortunate to win out. They were nothing like the Saints and Packers in 2011.
In that case the 87 Redskins were nothing like the 85 Bears, 86 Giants, 84 Niners, 89 Niners, 90 Giants, 83 Raiders, 92 Cowboys, 93 Cowboys, 94 Niners, 95 Cowboys and so forth. What is your point? Seems like it is you who needs the convincing about the legitimacy of the Skins titles, not the Giants fans. In fact, I have never in my life ever heard a Giants fan make the claim to which you are accusing.
__________________
"Everyone is talking about their dynasty. Well, OUR DYNASTY STARTS TONIGHT."--Michael Strahan, pre-game huddle Pep talk, February 3rd, 2008.
coggs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2012, 01:43 PM   #13
REDSKINS4ever
Playmaker
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,114
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

Quote:
Originally Posted by coggs View Post
In that case the 87 Redskins were nothing like the 85 Bears, 86 Giants, 84 Niners, 89 Niners, 90 Giants, 83 Raiders, 92 Cowboys, 93 Cowboys, 94 Niners, 95 Cowboys and so forth. What is your point? Seems like it is you who needs the convincing about the legitimacy of the Skins titles, not the Giants fans. In fact, I have never in my life ever heard a Giants fan make the claim to which you are accusing.
You failed to mention the 91 Redskins. Anyway, I hear that argument in New York City all the time from NYG fans. Not all of them, but those of them who claim to really know football. Once the NFL commissioner presents the Vince Lombardi trophy to an NFL organization, that alone legitimizes the SB victory, I tell them. It's sort of like a new world leader being sworn in.
REDSKINS4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 05:11 PM   #14
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,098
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giantone View Post
.....and that never would have happen in Washington,ever.
never, you wouldnt even know we won, because we would be so modest about it and never ever ever talk about it. ARE YOU EFFIN KIDDIN ME - my head is still big and swollen because of 70 chip!!!!! Please give me another big swollen head again - PLEASE!

are they supposed to be ashamed of it?

:confused:

edit: as for the strike teams well - only difference a full season would have made is a few more W's for us.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 04:08 PM   #15
Evilgrin
The Starter
 
Evilgrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 1,074
Re: The Legitimacy of Super Bowls 17 & 22

This must be a troll....
Evilgrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.31698 seconds with 11 queries