![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
Quote:
Anyhow, the world keeps on spinning.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 61
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
Quote:
The TO argument doesn't work for me when comparing the 2 QB's, Brunell turns the ball over as much or more than Ramsey, and his TO have been more devastating to the outcome of games, he's allowed the defense to score which Ramsey has not, Brunell is supposed to be a well seasoned veteran and should not be turning the ball over like he does, that was supposed to be a big reason why Gibbs likes veterans, well if he's going to turn it over like a youngster than what's the point, give the kid a try to see if he progresses, I just don't understand the stance that Ramsey would not have progressed and gotten better with more playing time? Matty stated that it really wasen't fair to compare what Ramsey did last season comparitivly because Gibbs had gotten things on track by the time Ramsey stepped in, are we sure it wasen't Ramsey who put things on track? Thats a big coincidence, that same argument can be used this season for Ramsey, is it fair to say that Ramsey would have become even better than Brunell this season as the offensive players around him progressed as well? Don't get me wrong I don't want to see Ramsey replace Brunell at this point in the season, this is Brunells baby let him finish it, I just think at the end of this season there will be no playoffs, and a lot of unanswered questions at QB, one of which will be what to do with an ageing QB? Do we play Campbell on a team that by year 3 is ready to take the next step? Do we go back to Brunell another year older who has proven nothing in 2 seasons? Or do we go with Ramsey who probably could care less what's promised him in the offseason, and can't get out of town fast enough? I think we have a big problem against the Boy's come sunday. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 41
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
Quote:
I like Ramsey. The kid's got heart, tough as nails, and he's probably going to be a solid #2 (ha...I said "solid #2") QB somewhere in this league. The fact of the matter is he's had 4 seasons, 2 coaches, 2 systems and more than enough opportunities to show he's not cut out to lead the team. Clearly Gibbs isn't comfortable with Ramsey at #1 - do people honestly think that this has nothing to do with Gibbs' coaching ability and knowledge of the situation? Or do you really believe Gibbs is just unfair, vindictive and playing favorites with his good boy Brunell and it's all a conspiracy? Come on folks, grow up.
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
i was calling for Brunell's head at the beginning of the season, but the thought of benching him healthy is utterly absurd at this point, why are people STILL talking about it? if he's hurt, bench him, we all know what an *injured* Brunell is capable of..2004.
it's not Brunell's arm that's got us here, we all know Ramsey has a much higher caliber gun, it's Brunell's LEGS. Brunell getting out of trouble is what has made this year possible, i think thats clear (and would explain why a leg injury made him suck so hard last year). the age of the gun armed pocket passer is dying in this league (unless you have a horseshoe on your helmet), our division especially and i think Gibbs sees that. hence the Jason Campbell pick. Bless Ramsey, his arm, and his toughness, dude's fearless - but he's a piss poor improviser, and when that speed rusher inevitably gets loose - the play breaks down and it's INT city. he may not throw the laser, but Brunell squirms away and keeps a level head as that NFC East heat comes. i thought with Jansen back and Rabach our O-Line would support a steady pocket passer but that just hasn't been the case. rushers always get through and 210lb Portis has had to come up and be a key pass blocker for this offense. i dont know if its our OLine or that it's just a different NFL, but it's all about the blitz and Brunell has been elusive and coherent enough to thrive on that. regardless, it's just not Ramsey's team this season - and we're way way too far in it to be changing up such a big piece of the formula. only if we have to, and looks like we don't - (except maybe getting Sellers in instead of Royal ![]()
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
I agree with the majority that Brunell should not be replaced now. But, I don't think it is absolutely crazy to broach the topic. As the WP pointed out, Brunell has had 4 TDs to 6 INTs in the last 7 games. Plus, our passing game has really faltered lately.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
Let's quit name-calling.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
Quote:
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
I'll try to cut back on the f-bombs but you put in these nice **** things
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
DAMN right!!!! Lets replace that worthless bastard!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NOW Can this F...... absurdity be put to bed FINALLY ?????????????
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,814
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 69
Posts: 868
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
This was by far the dumbest thread of all. I hope after the Cowgirl thrashing we can put to bed the Brunnel bashing. The guy is what he is. He controls the offense and gets the job done. It's not flashy but its winning football.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
Just goes to show you, you can't judge a quarterback's greatness only on the strength of his arm. There is so much more to a quarterback who is not only good, but one that is a true leader. Mark Brunell is a good quarterback AND a true leader. That is why he is starting. He's not the best quarterback in the league, but he's getting the job done for us.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,814
|
Re: Should Brunell be replaced? (merged)
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|