Super Bowl Gameday Thread

[donofriose]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

for sure, but if Seattle defense does its job it would never come down to that.


Another huge play was the Kearse drop on a perfectly thrown ball, over his shoulder which would have set up Seattle down on the Pats 25 yard line. That killed the momentum. Kearse effing sux, they got to get rid of him this offseason.

It was a hard catch and Butler made a good play if you watch it closely. Still those plays are the differences between winning a Super Bowl

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by donofriose

It was a hard catch and Butler made a good play if you watch it closely. Still those plays are the differences between winning a Super Bowl

wilson should have put the ball on him...in his stomach, but he lead him. Bad choice by Wilson.

When your go to guy is Ricardo Lockett, its a bad play call. Horrendous play call

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Everyone talking about the last play, but the Seattle defense collapsed in the 4th quarter and Brady threw 4 tds against them.

I agree. Tom was throwing all the underneath stuff and their defense never adjusted.Where was the aggressive play from their corners like in last year's SB where they man handled those WRs? Keep in mind though, Lane and Anvril got hurt in that game. That's 2 starters down.

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

I think Pete Carroll to a page out of Mike McCarthy's playbook there!

I think Pete is covering for Bevell's ass.

[donofriose]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

I agree. Tom was throwing all the underneath stuff and their defense never adjusted.Where was the aggressive play from their corners like in last year's SB where they man handled those WRs? Keep in mind though, Lane and Anvril got hurt in that game. That's 2 starters down.

I don't think they had the personal to cover small quick receivers. It was more about their linebackers not being able to cover the Running Backs/Tight Ends.

Also Seattle has always allowed the underneath stuff. The difference last night they didn't tackle and the linebackers were exposed through match-ups.

Last year's super bowl they not only tackled well but you could see the bronco receivers start to get scared. That took away the short stuff and then the pass rushers got to Manning. This year they couldn't take away the short stuff so the pass rushers could never get to Brady. He was just too quick with the ball.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by donofriose

I don't think they had the personal to cover small quick receivers. It was more about their linebackers not being able to cover the Running Backs/Tight Ends.

Also Seattle has always allowed the underneath stuff. The difference last night they didn't tackle and the linebackers were exposed through match-ups.

Last year's super bowl they not only tackled well but you could see the bronco receivers start to get scared. That took away the short stuff and then the pass rushers got to Manning. This year they couldn't take away the short stuff so the pass rushers could never get to Brady. He was just too quick with the ball.

Not sure I agree about their LBs not being able to cover TEs/RBs. They have top notch LBs and Bobby Wagner is 1st team all-pro. Not sure why they didn't jam those smaller receivers at the LOS. They have the size and speed to do that with guys like Edelman and Amendola. Granted, Sherman is hurt (probably needing surgery) and Lane was out of the game. That said, I still didn't like what I saw from them in that 4th quarter. Pats adjusted offensively, but Seattle didn't.

[donofriose]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Not sure I agree about their LBs not being able to cover TEs/RBs. They have top notch LBs and Bobby Wagner is 1st team all-pro. Not sure why they didn't jam those smaller receivers at the LOS. They have the size and speed to do that with guys like Edelman and Amendola. Granted, Sherman is hurt (probably needing surgery) and Lane was out of the game. That said, I still didn't like what I saw from them in that 4th quarter. Pats adjusted offensively, but Seattle didn't.

They tried to jam them. Simon just couldn't. That is who they kept throwing it at.

I think they could jam one of them but they didn't have the depth to do it to both. It is why Amendola had a pretty good game as well. Plus like I said, Seattle has always allowed the underneath stuff, they just didn't tackle as well as they usually do.

It wasn't Wagner. If you noticed they targeted Wright. That was who Gronk scored the touchdown on. A lot of those Vereen passes were on Wright. They actually tried to avoid Wagner, especially after his pick.

[KI Skins Fan]

That was one of the most entertaining Super Bowls ever. From the viewpoint of a fan with no rooting (or betting) interest, it was a great game to watch.

[donofriose]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

That was one of the most entertaining Super Bowls ever. From the viewpoint of a fan with no rooting (or betting) interest, it was a great game to watch.

It was. There are certain super bowls that are just great 4th quarters (like the giants vs the Patriots version 2). This one was entertaining the whole game.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

That was one of the most entertaining Super Bowls ever. From the viewpoint of a fan with no rooting (or betting) interest, it was a great game to watch.

Absolutely. If you were rooting for the Pats though it was extra entertaining. Man Seattle had it in the bag. Unreal. Great game.

[CrustyRedskin]

You've dreamed all your life of scoring a TD in the Super Bowl and this is what you do-do? Im so glad they lost.

https://twitter.com/World_Wide_Wob/s...760194/photo/1

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by CrustyRedskin

You've dreamed all your life of scoring a TD in the Super Bowl and this is what you do-do? Im so glad they lost.



https://twitter.com/World_Wide_Wob/s...760194/photo/1

LOL. Must have missed that last night! Wtf?
Agreed - sooo glad they lost.

[skinsfan69]

Puts Brady as one of the best of all time, if not the best. Pats had no running game and were one dimensional against a real good defense. Pretty much put the game in his hands with 50 passes and he delivered.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Puts Brady as one of the best of all time, if not the best. Pats had no running game and were one dimensional against a real good defense. Pretty much put the game in his hands with 50 passes and he delivered.

Dont tell NC that. Lmao

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Dont tell NC that. Lmao

Why do you put words into my sentences that aren't there? Tom is one of the greatest regardless of whether they win that game or not. In fact, just listen to how stupid this is. You are judging Tom based on a sequence of plays he isn't involved with. However that play went last night shouldn't change Tom's status as one of the best. It's not like he "lost his clutch ability" if they lose it.

The difference between you and me is that I recognize BB as one of the top 2 coaches of all time and continues to put complete teams around Brady, whereas you think the Patriots would not be crap without him.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Why do you put words into my sentences that aren't there? Tom is one of the greatest regardless of whether they win that game or not. In fact, just listen to how stupid this is. You are judging Tom based on a sequence of plays he isn't involved with. However that play went last night shouldn't change Tom's status as one of the best. It's not like he "lost his clutch ability" if they lose it.



The difference between you and me is that I recognize BB as one of the top 2 coaches of all time and continues to put complete teams around Brady, whereas you think the Patriots would not be crap without him.

Not crap but not 4 time superbowl champions. Not even close. I think BB is a tremendous coach.