Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


(Mega Merged Thread) Redskins-Dallas Game

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-13-2005, 11:28 PM   #151
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Cowboys-Redskins: Bad Matchups

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven
Patten has proven himself to be a capable wideout in the NFL. While some here may have written him off as a has-been, or that he suddenly forgot how to play, I think it's been more of a chemistry thing with Brunell. If, as you say Brunell is locked in to only two receivers to the point that he's neglecting other parts of the field, then that's the fault of Brunell.

Jacobs on the other hand has had time to break into the starting lineup and each year fails to do it. He has been virtually silent in his first legitimate shot at a starting role. Now, to be fair, Jacobs has been pushed into the #2 spot at a time when the offense as a whole seems to be in a rut. But by the same token, if Jacobs was truly going to be an effective player in this league, his play would be enhancing this offense, instead of being one of the reasons that it's struggling.

Still, I'll agree that Jacobs deserves at least the chance to make a contribution throughout the remainder of the season. If by then he hasn't "stepped up" and established himself as a member of the starting unit, his time here may have officially run out.


Well I was looking over the play-by-plays according to NFL.com from this year and it appears that for at least the first month and a half Patten did get a lot of looks just not a lot of receptions. Now part of that could have been Patten's fault, Brunell's, or plays such as the PI against Denver (I think). The numbers start to go down around the time that Patten got hurt.

After getting a ridiculous amount of looks his first game starting, Jacobs numbers have gone down. But again, a lot of that is probably attributable to an increased focus on the running game.

One thing to note is that unlike Jacobs, Patten never had a holding or illegal motion penalty or anything of that sort. But I agree with Beem-give him until the end of this season.


David Patten:

Week 1: 5 passes thrown, 3 catches
Week 2: 6 passes thrown, 1 catch
Bye Week
Week 4: 8 passes thrown, 3 catches
Week 5: 14 passes thrown, 7 catches
Week 6: 12 passes thrown, 4 catches
Week 7: 4 passes thrown, 2 catches
Week 8: 5 passes thrown, 1 catch
Week 9: 3 passes thrown, 0 catches
Week 10: 9 passes thrown, 3 catches

Taylor Jacobs:

Week 11: 12 passes thrown, 3 catches
Week 12: 5 passes thrown, 4 catches
Week 13: 4 passes thrown, 1 catch
Week 14: 2 passes thrown, 1 catch
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 12-13-2005, 11:33 PM   #152
lifetimeskin
Camp Scrub
 
lifetimeskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Maryland
Age: 60
Posts: 84
Why we will lose and

why we will win...

We will WIN if:

1) Terry Glenn is held in check (no big plays)
2) Moss has at least 2 catches over 20 yds.
3) Our play mix is 60-40 run
4) We convert on 50% of 3rd downs.
5) We win the turnover battle
6) We get at least 3 sacks
7) Portis rushes for 100 yds.

We will LOSE if:

4 out of those 7 don't go our way.

__________________
---lifetime skin
lifetimeskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 11:34 PM   #153
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Dallas will get sweet revenge

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44deisel44
Comes in talkin chit, and leaves in doubt...grt job TAF
um thanks...not sure what I did though
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 11:51 PM   #154
lifetimeskin
Camp Scrub
 
lifetimeskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Maryland
Age: 60
Posts: 84
Re: Dallas will get sweet revenge

SANTRAPJACK---R U SERIOUS WITH YOUR ANALYSIS????

"The Washington defense is ranked #9 in the NFL and Dallas Defense is ranked #10. The only thing that seperates the two is LESS THAN 2 YARDS of total yardage allowed. Dallas has allowed an average of 300.7 ypg and the Redskins defense has allowed 298.8 ypg. That is only a 1.9 yard difference over 13 games. If you do the math over 13 games the Dallas defense has only allowed 4 INCHES (not yards or feet, but INCHES) more per game than that of the Washington defense."


Are you kidding me with your analysis???? that is 1.9 yds per GAME!!!! You would need to multiply that number times 13 (GAMES) or nealry 26 yards.......INCHES, what are you talking about? What was your SAT score?
__________________
---lifetime skin
lifetimeskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 11:52 PM   #155
ysl
Camp Scrub
 
ysl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5
Re: Why we will lose and

You won't need to worry about those things. The Foreskins will lose just because you're playing the Cowboys. Don't forget, historically you only get one lucky win against us a year... not 2.
ysl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 11:54 PM   #156
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Cowboys-Redskins: Bad Matchups

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaquero
Get ready to loose.......
Washington will be no match.......

Can clearly see that most of you feel the same way.

Go Boys!
Bienvenidos Vaquero...I'm impressed you have time to post here, I figured you were busy cramming for your test
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 11:56 PM   #157
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Dallas will get sweet revenge

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifetimeskin
SANTRAPJACK---R U SERIOUS WITH YOUR ANALYSIS????

"The Washington defense is ranked #9 in the NFL and Dallas Defense is ranked #10. The only thing that seperates the two is LESS THAN 2 YARDS of total yardage allowed. Dallas has allowed an average of 300.7 ypg and the Redskins defense has allowed 298.8 ypg. That is only a 1.9 yard difference over 13 games. If you do the math over 13 games the Dallas defense has only allowed 4 INCHES (not yards or feet, but INCHES) more per game than that of the Washington defense."


Are you kidding me with your analysis???? that is 1.9 yds per GAME!!!! You would need to multiply that number times 13 (GAMES) or nealry 26 yards.......INCHES, what are you talking about? What was your SAT score?
Yeah, ask the Redskins what 1.9 yards meant at the end of the Tampa game.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 11:56 PM   #158
ysl
Camp Scrub
 
ysl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5
Re: Dallas will get sweet revenge

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins8588
What did the TUNA think that Larry Johnson and Co. were just going to have a bad day, so he wanted to stop the threat of E. Kinninson, S. Parker and D. Hall? Still makes no sense!!! Sorry that arugment does not hold water!!
Sorry, it does hold water and you obviously didn't watch the game. The Cowboys did not stack more than the front 7 most of the game because, yes, Parcells does believe in his teams' ability to stop the run. Unbeknownst to him his defense played the absolute worst game of the year on defense and yes, KC's offense presents mismatch problems for Dallas in the air now that Dat is gone and our corners weren't 100%.

Go watch some film before you start blowing farts out of your mouth gassing up the place. You can disagree with the argument all you like but that still won't change the fact that Dallas played mostly pass D.

Sad thing is we couldn't stop that either.
ysl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 11:59 PM   #159
ysl
Camp Scrub
 
ysl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5
Re: Dallas will get sweet revenge

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifetimeskin
SANTRAPJACK---R U SERIOUS WITH YOUR ANALYSIS????

"The Washington defense is ranked #9 in the NFL and Dallas Defense is ranked #10. The only thing that seperates the two is LESS THAN 2 YARDS of total yardage allowed. Dallas has allowed an average of 300.7 ypg and the Redskins defense has allowed 298.8 ypg. That is only a 1.9 yard difference over 13 games. If you do the math over 13 games the Dallas defense has only allowed 4 INCHES (not yards or feet, but INCHES) more per game than that of the Washington defense."


Are you kidding me with your analysis???? that is 1.9 yds per GAME!!!! You would need to multiply that number times 13 (GAMES) or nealry 26 yards.......INCHES, what are you talking about? What was your SAT score?
Oh now don't get to worked up. We've been missing our best corner for about five games now. That's why the Skins are ahead.
ysl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 12:02 AM   #160
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Dallas will get sweet revenge

Quote:
Originally Posted by ysl
Oh now don't get to worked up. We've been missing our best corner for about five games now. That's why the Skins are ahead.
Right, because the Redskins have been totally healthy all season long.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 12:02 AM   #161
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
Re: (Mega Merged Thread) Redskins-Dallas Game

You're complicating things man. We lose the turnover battle and we lose the game...it's that simple!
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 08:31 AM   #162
onlydarksets
Playmaker
 
onlydarksets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
Re: (Mega Merged Thread) Redskins-Dallas Game

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1
You're complicating things man. We lose the turnover battle and we lose the game...it's that simple!
You're probably right since, inferentially, that means that Brunell plays a solid game. He doesn't need to throw for 300 yards for us to win. Although, with that Dallass secondary, he very well might!
onlydarksets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 08:38 AM   #163
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: (Mega Merged Thread) Redskins-Dallas Game

so much crying... everyone has injuries and monday wasn't a miracle, the roids just royally stunk it up. Maybe you can play 60 minutes this time around, maybe you can't, but weak smack and lame excuses certainly aren't going to win this game.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 10:02 AM   #164
sandtrapjack
The Starter
 
sandtrapjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
Re: (Mega Merged Thread) Redskins-Dallas Game

Quote:
Originally Posted by onlydarksets
You're probably right since, inferentially, that means that Brunell plays a solid game. He doesn't need to throw for 300 yards for us to win. Although, with that Dallass secondary, he very well might!
Ok, you entire starting CB corp are hurt probably will not play on Sunday, Gibbs is moving a practice squad guy up to play, and another who has never made a start in the NFL, Sean Taylor will probably be lining up in coverage as well.

With all that, and our starting and releif CB's and safeties are all healthy, and you want to talk smack about the DALLAS SECONDARY?
sandtrapjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 10:12 AM   #165
jermus22
Special Teams
 
jermus22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Frankfort, KY
Age: 43
Posts: 336
Re: (Mega Merged Thread) Redskins-Dallas Game

I won't pretend that I'm optimistic about winning, but if Dallas loses, then you'll have to admit that the Cowgirls are one sorry ass team. With all of the injuries in Washington, there's no excuse for Dallas losing. Looking forward to a big upset and kicking your ass!
__________________
Win it in the trenches.
jermus22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.60088 seconds with 10 queries