Jabar Gaffney Told to Seek A Trade

[los panda]

Originally Posted by scowan

Gaffney is not even under contract, correct? I mean is he technical still on the team?
I know online internet rosters haven't been updated much since the end of the season, so you can't go by any of those.

that is true, he is waiting to be reelected by the fans, he just needs majority. contracts can void themselves if not properly maintained, it looks like that may have happened in this case

[Monkeydad]

We'll probably end up cutting him to save a little cap room. Moss would save us more, but I'd rather keep Moss.

I don't believe Gaffney is a FA this year. Still under contract.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by los panda

that is true, he is waiting to be reelected by the fans, he just needs majority. contracts can void themselves if not properly maintained, it looks like that may have happened in this case

What?

[los panda]

why would a trade be mentioned if he wasn't under contract?

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Monkeydad

We'll probably end up cutting him to save a little cap room. Moss would save us more, but I'd rather keep Moss.

I don't believe Gaffney is a FA this year. Still under contract.

As I understand, cutting Moss save us about $1.5 million whereas cutting Gaffney would be around $2.5 million.

[donofriose]

I think the league knows we are probably just going to eventually cut him. So probably no trade

[artmonkforhallofamein07]

A 12 page thread on a player who was asked to look for a trade.

Wow we need something new to dwell on.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

As I understand, cutting Moss save us about $1.5 million whereas cutting Gaffney would be around $2.5 million.

If we cut Moss in July, we save a lot more.

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by Monkeydad

If we cut Moss in July, we save a lot more.

Hmmm. Thought I heard otherwise. But regardless I really can't see us cutting him. Garcon, regardless of the hype, can't be expected to contribute consistently. Hank and Morgan are ? with injury status. And Moss knows the system better than anyone.

...that said Tana needs to step up this season.

[SmootSmack]

Yeah a post June 1 cut does save more money (cutting Moss that is), but I think it's just a difference of a $100k or so, between cutting Moss post June 1 and cutting Gaffney (at any time)

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07

A 12 page thread on a player who was asked to look for a trade.

Wow we need something new to dwell on.

Don't worry, I am just about to start a new thread comparing Luck's draft reactions to Griffins, and then expound on the need for OL. I got your back!

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Don't worry, I am just about to start a new thread comparing Luck's draft reactions to Griffins, and then expound on the need for OL. I got your back!

But, but, but, I thought we had seen the last of the Luck/Griffin thread...according to one thread.

LOL.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by The Goat

Hmmm. Thought I heard otherwise. But regardless I really can't see us cutting him. Garcon, regardless of the hype, can't be expected to contribute consistently. Hank and Morgan are ? with injury status. And Moss knows the system better than anyone.



...that said Tana needs to step up this season.

Why can't Garcon be counted on to produce consistent.

[REDSKINS4ever]

Garcon should be able to produce. With Hankerson, Morgan, and Moss, the Redskins passing/receiving game should be very sharp.

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Why can't Garcon be counted on to produce consistent.

Pierre Garcon, WR for the Washington Redskins at NFL.com

Considering he had arguably the greatest QB of all-time throwing to him till last year, when he became the primary WR target for most of the season, I would call those pretty pedestrian numbers. Oh and he's a bit of a fumbler, especially for a WR.