Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Jason Taylor Released

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-2009, 09:01 PM   #1
SCRedskinsFan
Impact Rookie
 
SCRedskinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pawleys Island SC
Posts: 685
Re: Jason Taylor Released

Just a thought... Now there's cap room for Cutler right?
SCRedskinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 09:08 PM   #2
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
Re: Jason Taylor Released

This was a surprise, I would have thought he would at least play one more year. What a f'ing waste of a draft pick.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 09:12 PM   #3
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
Re: Jason Taylor Released

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
This was a surprise, I would have thought he would at least play one more year. What a f'ing waste of a draft pick.
Two draft picks...

I am starting to really get pissed over this.

I think you can make the argument that even after adding Haynesworth, Hall and Dockery that we aren't any better than our opening day roster last year now that we have lost Taylor, Springs and Washington (also assuming that Kendall is gone).

A whole lot of money spent and nothing to show for it...
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 09:17 PM   #4
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Jason Taylor Released

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight View Post
Two draft picks...

I am starting to really get pissed over this.

I think you can make the argument that even after adding Haynesworth, Hall and Dockery that we aren't any better than our opening day roster last year now that we have lost Taylor, Springs and Washington (also assuming that Kendall is gone).

A whole lot of money spent and nothing to show for it...
Ah ha. Another advocate for bringing Marcus back Can't agree w/ you on Springs and Taylor though as neither contributed much last year.

... and we will be more talented on both sides of the ball come opening day
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 09:17 PM   #5
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Jason Taylor Released

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight View Post
Two draft picks...

I am starting to really get pissed over this.

I think you can make the argument that even after adding Haynesworth, Hall and Dockery that we aren't any better than our opening day roster last year now that we have lost Taylor, Springs and Washington (also assuming that Kendall is gone).

A whole lot of money spent and nothing to show for it...
I think just their age and durability issues as they get older make Dockery and Hall improvements over Kendall and Springs. That doesn't even include Washington's issues staying healthy. And Haynesworth is arguably better than all of them combined at this point in their career.

But yeah, the experiment failed with Jason Taylor. But now we got to make some pina colada out of this coconut and take advantage of these $8 million we have.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 09:25 PM   #6
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
Re: Jason Taylor Released

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I think just their age and durability issues as they get older make Dockery and Hall improvements over Kendall and Springs. That doesn't even include Washington's issues staying healthy. And Haynesworth is arguably better than all of them combined at this point in their career.

But yeah, the experiment failed with Jason Taylor. But now we got to make some pina colada out of this coconut and take advantage of these $8 million we have.
I definitely agree that long term it is better to have Dock and Hall but as far as talent and production at this moment it is probably a wash.

I just think that if you look big picture you can't say that the 2009 Redskins have a significant advantage in talent over the 2008 team. Of course we expect JC and the second year receivers to improve but still...

Danny and Vinny are going to have to win me back over with the Taylor cap space.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 09:44 PM   #7
Redskins8588
Playmaker
 
Redskins8588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,519
Re: Jason Taylor Released

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight View Post
I definitely agree that long term it is better to have Dock and Hall but as far as talent and production at this moment it is probably a wash.

I just think that if you look big picture you can't say that the 2009 Redskins have a significant advantage in talent over the 2008 team. Of course we expect JC and the second year receivers to improve but still...

Danny and Vinny are going to have to win me back over with the Taylor cap space.
I disagree with you on the statement in bold. I think that with the addition of Haynesworth, Dockery, and the retention of Hall, puts the Redskins in a better position. I guess I may look at things differently but the way I see it is like this, yes Springs is better than Hall but it doesn't matter how much better Springs is when he is only going to play 5 or 6 games. We need a corner that can play at least 14 of the 16 games. We know what Hall brings to the table and I really don't see him being a problem in the locker room for the Redskins. And with Hall we have 3 first round picks in the secondary.

I am not looking for Haynesworth to get double digits sacks this year I am anticipating the double teams that he will see which should free up Carter and Fletcher to make the play. I mean I really don't think that Fletcher ever got the benefit of having a monster DT in front of him eating up the blockers and letting him make the plays. IMO, Fletcher is the hardest working MLB in the game. With us being able to get more pressure on the opposing QB we should force the QB in to making errant passes in which Hall will hopefully turn into turnovers for us, if not Hall than hopefully Horton...

Now, Dockery, IMO we should have tried to keep him but he did the same thing that every NFL player will do chase the money, cant blame him for that. But he is much better than Kendall, IMO. I mean Kendall did a good job filling in for us but the chemistry that exist between Samuels and Dockery can't be replaced in that short of time. I think that Samuels and Dockery will get things back in order in no time and our left side of the line will be one of the best in the NFL.

Just my thoughts....
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor
Redskins8588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 09:48 PM   #8
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Jason Taylor Released

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight View Post
I definitely agree that long term it is better to have Dock and Hall but as far as talent and production at this moment it is probably a wash.

I just think that if you look big picture you can't say that the 2009 Redskins have a significant advantage in talent over the 2008 team. Of course we expect JC and the second year receivers to improve but still...

Danny and Vinny are going to have to win me back over with the Taylor cap space.
You are right. We fill holes by creating them elsewhere. However, these are the growing pains of the massive youth movement going on. I'm all for the youth movement. It is how you build a dynasty - let 'em grow up together.

Of course, the problem is that you need more than four draft choices to run a youth movement. Ugh.

You are also right that VC had better use that J.Taylor cap space intelligently. Don't squander the cash after squandering the draft picks!
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 09:57 PM   #9
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: Jason Taylor Released

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight View Post
Two draft picks...

I am starting to really get pissed over this.

I think you can make the argument that even after adding Haynesworth, Hall and Dockery that we aren't any better than our opening day roster last year now that we have lost Taylor, Springs and Washington (also assuming that Kendall is gone).

A whole lot of money spent and nothing to show for it...
In what universe is an '09 Taylor, Springs and Washington better than Haynesworth, Hall and Dockery? All of the former Redskins missed significant time last season, Washington and Springs many games over the previous couple of seasons too. Dockery is an upgrade in age, athleticism and production from Kendall. I don't see how this offseason is 'a whole lot of money spend and nothing to show for it.'
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 11:23 PM   #10
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Jason Taylor Released

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
In what universe is an '09 Taylor, Springs and Washington better than Haynesworth, Hall and Dockery? All of the former Redskins missed significant time last season, Washington and Springs many games over the previous couple of seasons too. Dockery is an upgrade in age, athleticism and production from Kendall. I don't see how this offseason is 'a whole lot of money spend and nothing to show for it.'
Totally agree. Springs and Washington were used up for the most part and were off the field almost as much as they were on, if not more with Springs. Giving Haynesworth that huge contract was ridiculous though.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 11:55 PM   #11
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
Re: Jason Taylor Released

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
In what universe is an '09 Taylor, Springs and Washington better than Haynesworth, Hall and Dockery? All of the former Redskins missed significant time last season, Washington and Springs many games over the previous couple of seasons too. Dockery is an upgrade in age, athleticism and production from Kendall. I don't see how this offseason is 'a whole lot of money spend and nothing to show for it.'
I didn't say those 3 were better, I said that the '09 roster isn't much better than the '08 roster.

Dockery is bigger but I wouldn't say he is a significant upgrade over Kendall. I don't think the left side of the line lost anything with Kendall the last two years.

When healthy (the big if) Springs is more talented than Hall. He has more skill. He is more physical and can play nickel.

You know why we have nothing to show for it? Because Chris Wilson and Blades are projected starters. That is horrible and unacceptable after $180million + goes out the door. Plus, take a look at Haynesworth's comments on why he chose Washington over Tampa Bay. I would love to know what he is thinking now that Springs and Taylor are gone.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 09:10 PM   #12
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Jason Taylor Released

It'd be kind of ironic if the Bucs pass on Crowell in order to sign Jason Taylor and then we swoop in and get Crowell.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 09:15 PM   #13
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Jason Taylor Released

Yeah Crowell is a huge risk... sort of similar to the DE we had as a backup part of the last year (name?). I think some people aren't facing reality: there's very little LB talent left in FA... the younger/healthier guy June is too small. The rest are pretty questionable SO WHOEVER WE BRING ON IS EITHER FOR DEPTH OR A SPOT STARTER. Sorry for yelling. Meanwhile Evans, surprise, is listed right near the top in DE talent left in FA. Sign Evans tonight. Keep Daniels on at vet min for an insurance policy and because he's an important locker room leader. Bottom line: we basically have to come away from the draft w/ a legit starter at LB.

This is the way I see the defense... and btw Orakpo ain't falling to us @ 13 and it's for the best. Kid has phenom physique but will be oft injured in the NFL...
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 09:29 PM   #14
vallin21
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,180
Re: Jason Taylor Released

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Yeah Crowell is a huge risk... sort of similar to the DE we had as a backup part of the last year (name?). I think some people aren't facing reality: there's very little LB talent left in FA... the younger/healthier guy June is too small. The rest are pretty questionable SO WHOEVER WE BRING ON IS EITHER FOR DEPTH OR A SPOT STARTER. Sorry for yelling. Meanwhile Evans, surprise, is listed right near the top in DE talent left in FA. Sign Evans tonight. Keep Daniels on at vet min for an insurance policy and because he's an important locker room leader. Bottom line: we basically have to come away from the draft w/ a legit starter at LB.

This is the way I see the defense... and btw Orakpo ain't falling to us @ 13 and it's for the best. Kid has phenom physique but will be oft injured in the NFL...
I would NOT sign Dainels for my life Goat, even if for the vet min. Evans is tricky give that he's 30 and we don't know what he's asking for at Ashburn, if its a crazy contract let him go to SF. I would offer Evans a 2yr 6 mil deal w/ a 2 mil in incentives and let him be the starter. I'm betting Orakpo will fall to us at 13, but we take Oher instead.
vallin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 09:37 PM   #15
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
Re: Jason Taylor Released

Quote:
Originally Posted by vallin21 View Post
I would NOT sign Dainels for my life Goat, even if for the vet min. Evans is tricky give that he's 30 and we don't know what he's asking for at Ashburn, if its a crazy contract let him go to SF. I would offer Evans a 2yr 6 mil deal w/ a 2 mil in incentives and let him be the starter. I'm betting Orakpo will fall to us at 13, but we take Oher instead.
What is wrong with Daniels? You would rather have Chris Wilson and Buzzbee than him? I wouldn't at least not right now.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.71109 seconds with 10 queries