Randy Moss Waived (claimed by Titans)

MTK · 11-02-2010, 12:36 PM

All #1 WRs don't have issues. Just look at last night's game with Andre Johnson and Reggie Wayne.

diehardskin2982 · 11-02-2010, 12:40 PM

he didn't have issues in new england untill they wouldn't pay him. give him a career ending contract and tell him to go long!

artmonkforhallofamein07 · 11-02-2010, 01:09 PM

Man I don't know if I would want this clown on the team. If we don't win he becomes a huge problem!

hail_2_da_skins · 11-02-2010, 03:21 PM

Are you guys NUTS! The Patriots know it. Now the Vikings remember why they got rid of the guy the first time. He does not go all our every play. He loafs. If it's a running play, he loafs. If he think the pass is not coming his way, he loafs. He shows his ass to the crowd. The Redskins are already dealing with the Donovan McNabb and Albert Haynesworth controversy. They do not need another. This bum is too old and lacks effort. NFW.

CRedskinsRule · 11-02-2010, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hail_2_da_skins

Are you guys NUTS! The Patriots know it. Now the Vikings remember why they got rid of the guy the first time. He does not go all our every play. He loafs. If it's a running play, he loafs. If he think the pass is not coming his way, he loafs. He shows his ass to the crowd. The Redskins are already dealing with the Donovan McNabb and Albert Haynesworth controversy. They do not need another. This bum is too old and lacks effort. NFW.

I am guessing you voted No. :cheeky-sm

rbanerjee23 · 11-02-2010, 03:53 PM

You can have #1 WR production without the issues (Andre Johnson, Fitzgerald, Wayne, Welker etc.) or with issues (Randy Moss, TO, Ochocinco etc.)

The better question is, would we rather continue developing Armstrong, leaning on Moss (Santana) for however long we have him and improving our depth through the draft or renting Moss for a year with all his known issues? And just to keep things in perspective, McNabb was finding people when the OL gave him more than 2 seconds to get rid of the ball.

Would Randy Moss help? Undoubtedly, but is he worth all the additional baggage? Not for me, but that's just my 2 cents

CRedskinsRule · 11-02-2010, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rbanerjee23

You can have #1 WR production without the issues (Andre Johnson, Fitzgerald, Wayne, Welker etc.) or with issues (Randy Moss, TO, Ochocinco etc.)

The better question is, would we rather continue developing Armstrong, leaning on Moss (Santana) for however long we have him and improving our depth through the draft or renting Moss for a year with all his known issues? And just to keep things in perspective, McNabb was finding people when the OL gave him more than 2 seconds to get rid of the ball.

Would Randy Moss help? Undoubtedly, but is he worth all the additional baggage? Not for me, but that's just my 2 cents

Like I said before, RM catches the balls Galloway missed. I think we win at least one more game with him, and over the next 8 games, that would mean a 9-7 record versus and 8-8. I think it's likely that RM opens the field up a lot more than AA or Santana does, and that benefits Cooley, Davis, even the line because fewer blitzes are likely (or we will burn more teams when they send the blitz). I think we have a good shot at him if we put a waiver claim in.

BaltimoreSkins · 11-02-2010, 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rbanerjee23

You can have #1 WR production without the issues (Andre Johnson, Fitzgerald, Wayne, Welker etc.) or with issues (Randy Moss, TO, Ochocinco etc.)

The better question is, would we rather continue developing Armstrong, leaning on Moss (Santana) for however long we have him and improving our depth through the draft or renting Moss for a year with all his known issues? And just to keep things in perspective, McNabb was finding people when the OL gave him more than 2 seconds to get rid of the ball.

Would Randy Moss help? Undoubtedly, but is he worth all the additional baggage? Not for me, but that's just my 2 cents

I think Randy would be a stop gap. Personally I'd rather invest the $ in o-line. As you stated the WR stats would be a lot better if Donnie wasn't on his ass 90% of passing plays.

MTK · 11-02-2010, 04:09 PM

Moss obviously isn't a long term solution, he's probably a 1 year rental at this point. Personally I wouldn't want to give him a 3 year deal, he's not worth the headaches, and honestly he's past his prime.

Monkeydad · 11-02-2010, 04:12 PM

Santana would still be the best Moss on the team, but Randy would be an upgrade over Galloway.

Pocket$ $traight · 11-02-2010, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buster

Santana would still be the best Moss on the team, but Randy would be an upgrade over Galloway.

Are you joking?

skinsfaninok · 11-02-2010, 04:17 PM

Mort just said on espn that 4 teams that are most likely to land Moss are Rams, Redskins, Raiders and Chiefs.

Defensewins · 11-02-2010, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Mort just said on espn that 4 teams that are most likely to land Moss are Rams, Redskins, Raiders and Chiefs.

I think it is clear that what created this mess with the Vikings is Moss wants like hell to be on a playoff team that has superbowl possibilities. He is getting old and desperately wants a ring.
If he is not on a SB team, which the Vikes have a losing record and Farve is now hurt, so Moss deliberately sabotaged the situation with the Vikings in order to get released.
FYI - the four teams you and Mort listed above, none of them are legitimate SB contenders, so Moss will not want to go there.

SFREDSKIN · 11-02-2010, 05:59 PM

Tomorrow should be an interesting day with Merriman and Moss both on the waiver wire.

Adam S.

Chargers releaed LB Shawne Merriman and placed Buster Davis on IR. Let the guessing on Merriman begin. Mine? Miami. about 1 hour ago via web

San Diego Chargers place Shawne Merriman on waivers - ESPN

mlmpetert · 11-02-2010, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Defensewins

I think it is clear that what created this mess with the Vikings is Moss wants like hell to be on a playoff team that has superbowl possibilities. He is getting old and desperately wants a ring.
If he is not on a SB team, which the Vikes have a losing record and Farve is now hurt, so Moss deliberately sabotaged the situation with the Vikings in order to get released.
FYI - the four teams you and Mort listed above, none of them are legitimate SB contenders, so Moss will not want to go there.

Out of those 4 team its a close call to where he would want to end up.

KC is prob the best team with the most certin QB outlook/play, a New England like GM but theyre in the AFC - which is the hardest confrence.

Rams have what seems like a young decent group of talent comeing togather with what should be decent WR's for next year and going foward - which is a good thing for Moss

I dont see him wanting anything to do with Oakland

Redskins have what should/could be the most proven QB under center and a simular coach that Moss enjoyed with his time in NE. But we prob have the most amount of question marks in regards to our new offensive and defensive system, as well as who our QB will be next year if McNabb wants to be a free agent. We are also in what is usually the hardest division in the NFC.

If i were him it would be KC, Redskins, Rams, and then sit out and take my chances with the new CBA next year.

View Poll Results: Would you want Randy Moss on the Skins?
Yes	81	71.05%
No	33	28.95%
Voters: 114. You may not vote on this poll

11-02-2010, 12:40 PM	#2
diehardskin2982 Another Year, another mess. Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,581	re: Randy Moss Waived (claimed by Titans) he didn't have issues in new england untill they wouldn't pay him. give him a career ending contract and tell him to go long! __________________ That got ugly fast

11-02-2010, 01:09 PM	#3
artmonkforhallofamein07 Pro Bowl Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Charleston , SC Posts: 5,001	re: Randy Moss Waived (claimed by Titans) Man I don't know if I would want this clown on the team. If we don't win he becomes a huge problem! __________________ Just win.

11-02-2010, 03:21 PM	#4
hail_2_da_skins Impact Rookie Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: St. Louis, MO Age: 69 Posts: 868	re: Randy Moss Waived (claimed by Titans) Are you guys NUTS! The Patriots know it. Now the Vikings remember why they got rid of the guy the first time. He does not go all our every play. He loafs. If it's a running play, he loafs. If he think the pass is not coming his way, he loafs. He shows his ass to the crowd. The Redskins are already dealing with the Donovan McNabb and Albert Haynesworth controversy. They do not need another. This bum is too old and lacks effort. NFW. __________________ "HAIL TO THE SKINS"

11-02-2010, 03:53 PM	#6
rbanerjee23 The Starter Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 2,440	re: Randy Moss Waived (claimed by Titans) You can have #1 WR production without the issues (Andre Johnson, Fitzgerald, Wayne, Welker etc.) or with issues (Randy Moss, TO, Ochocinco etc.) The better question is, would we rather continue developing Armstrong, leaning on Moss (Santana) for however long we have him and improving our depth through the draft or renting Moss for a year with all his known issues? And just to keep things in perspective, McNabb was finding people when the OL gave him more than 2 seconds to get rid of the ball. Would Randy Moss help? Undoubtedly, but is he worth all the additional baggage? Not for me, but that's just my 2 cents __________________ "Tough times don't last but tough people do" -Mike Shanahan HTTR

11-02-2010, 12:36 PM	#1
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,832	re: Randy Moss Waived (claimed by Titans) All #1 WRs don't have issues. Just look at last night's game with Andre Johnson and Reggie Wayne. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

11-02-2010, 04:09 PM	#9
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,832	re: Randy Moss Waived (claimed by Titans) Moss obviously isn't a long term solution, he's probably a 1 year rental at this point. Personally I wouldn't want to give him a 3 year deal, he's not worth the headaches, and honestly he's past his prime. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

11-02-2010, 04:12 PM	#10
Monkeydad Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 46 Posts: 17,460	re: Randy Moss Waived (claimed by Titans) Santana would still be the best Moss on the team, but Randy would be an upgrade over Galloway. __________________ Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster

11-02-2010, 04:17 PM	#12
skinsfaninok Warpath Hall of Fame Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: UNITED STATES Age: 38 Posts: 36,178	re: Randy Moss Waived (claimed by Titans) Mort just said on espn that 4 teams that are most likely to land Moss are Rams, Redskins, Raiders and Chiefs. __________________ “Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban

11-02-2010, 05:59 PM	#14
SFREDSKIN Living Legend Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Pacifica, CA Posts: 15,164	re: Randy Moss Waived (claimed by Titans) Tomorrow should be an interesting day with Merriman and Moss both on the waiver wire. Adam S. Chargers releaed LB Shawne Merriman and placed Buster Davis on IR. Let the guessing on Merriman begin. Mine? Miami. about 1 hour ago via web San Diego Chargers place Shawne Merriman on waivers - ESPN __________________ Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth

Randy Moss Waived (claimed by Titans)

Locker Room Main Forum