Is it me or do the Eagles have no talent?

skinsttw · 03-20-2006, 07:56 AM

If McNabb is healthy, they will be above .500 this year. Don't know how good their D will play though. Also, the running game is still a question mark.

BigSKINBauer · 03-20-2006, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsttw

If McNabb is healthy, they will be above .500 this year. Don't know how good their D will play though. Also, the running game is still a question mark.

you have to have a running game before it can become a question mark...

PWNED · 03-20-2006, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigSKINBauer

you have to have a running game before it can become a question mark...

theyve got one. doughboy reid just is scared to use it.

3rd ID SOLDIER · 03-20-2006, 08:16 AM

they fight remember that they aint no punks they took us to the wire with those so called scrubs

PWNED · 03-20-2006, 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3rd ID SOLDIER

they fight remember that they aint no punks they took us to the wire with those so called scrubs

true, but a lot of times it seemed last year that the skins played to the level of their opponents. we were supposed to get stomped by SD and we played right with them until overtime. same with the raiders. we were supposed to whoop that ass and lost to them at HOME.

MTK · 03-20-2006, 08:24 AM

The Eagles will enter the season as easily the worst team in the East, but I think they are still dangerous. Maybe not the yearly contender they used to be, but with a healthy McNabb they'll be able to compete.

They still have major problems at WR and that will hold them back. And then there's the non-existent running game, both in terms of a 20+ carry a game back and a overall lack of committment by Reid to pounding the ball.

PWNED · 03-20-2006, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

The Eagles will enter the season as easily the worst team in the East, but I think they are still dangerous. Maybe not the yearly contender they used to be, but with a healthy McNabb they'll be able to compete.

They still have major problems at WR and that will hold them back. And then there's the non-existent running game, both in terms of a 20+ carry a game back and a overall lack of committment by Reid to pounding the ball.

right i think coaching actually has a lot to do with it. you cant score points if you dont use your strengths.

Drift Reality · 03-20-2006, 08:26 AM

Don't ever count them out. Football isn't a game of individuals, it is about a team - how it gels and how these guys work together. The Eagles had one good year after five of dominance, so I'd be careful before discounting them anytime soon.

PWNED · 03-20-2006, 09:11 AM

i also think that our offense is due for an explosion. if everyone gels and we stay healthy, the skins offense has the talent to be top 3, if not the top. we have more weapons than the colts and if brunell can just hit the open guy, no defense shoudl be able to plan for us.

That Guy · 03-20-2006, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PWNED

i also think that our offense is due for an explosion. if everyone gels and we stay healthy, the skins offense has the talent to be top 3, if not the top. we have more weapons than the colts and if brunell can just hit the open guy, no defense shoudl be able to plan for us.

we can't touch the colts with weapons. they have peyton and a better receiving corp.

PWNED · 03-20-2006, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy

we can't touch the colts with weapons. they have peyton and a better receiving corp.

i disagree. the QB is making a lot of those receivers look better than they are. harrison is still elite, but i feel that moss might be just a step under him. we have a better TE/hback, better RB, and two WRs that at the very least have the potential to at least COMBINE for more yardage than WAyne.

jordanz301 · 03-20-2006, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PWNED

i disagree. the QB is making a lot of those receivers look better than they are. harrison is still elite, but i feel that moss might be just a step under him. we have a better TE/hback, better RB, and two WRs that at the very least have the potential to at least COMBINE for more yardage than WAyne.

they have harrison who w/o a doubt is better than santana only because of his experience and his records. they have reggie wayne who should be a number 1 receiver somewhere and better than Lloyd, randle and patten, maybe even moss.they have stokley who is awsome and very accounted for by defenses and is reliable to make the big catch. then you have dallas clark who i think is about the same level of cooley but more experience.then you have PEYTON MANNING who is def better than brunell, campbell, collins, randle el, and anoyone else who think they can throw combined!but we do have a running back who is top 10 running back and they dont have one.
this isnt a knock on the skins but dont compare our offense to colts. if anything compare it to the rams or the cheifs of last yr but not the colts

PWNED · 03-20-2006, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jordanz301

they have harrison who w/o a doubt is better than santana only because of his experience and his records. they have reggie wayne who should be a number 1 receiver somewhere and better than Lloyd, randle and patten, maybe even moss.they have stokley who is awsome and very accounted for by defenses and is reliable to make the big catch. then you have dallas clark who i think is about the same level of cooley but more experience.then you have PEYTON MANNING who is def better than brunell, campbell, collins, randle el, and anoyone else who think they can throw combined!but we do have a running back who is top 10 running back and they dont have one.
this isnt a knock on the skins but dont compare our offense to colts. if anything compare it to the rams or the cheifs of last yr but not the colts

oh i can and i will. dallas clark and stokley only had the numbers they did due to that running game with edge and the threat of wayne and harrison. the same could easily be said for us except we DO have that great running back.

Skins_4_Lyfe · 03-20-2006, 11:31 AM

What the hell was Peter King talking about...he mentioned the Eagles and Cowboys and failed to mention the Skins...we're better off than the Giants too if you ask me.

D'BOYZ · 03-20-2006, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skins_4_Lyfe

What the hell was Peter King talking about...he mentioned the Eagles and Cowboys and failed to mention the Skins...we're better off than the Giants too if you ask me.

I din't read anything in peter's colum about the eagles being the team to bet next year or anything like it it was mostly all about TO.

03-20-2006, 07:56 AM	#1
skinsttw Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Richmond, VA Posts: 174	Re: Is it me or do the Eagles have no talent? If McNabb is healthy, they will be above .500 this year. Don't know how good their D will play though. Also, the running game is still a question mark. __________________ Go skins!

03-20-2006, 08:16 AM	#4
3rd ID SOLDIER Special Teams Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 197	Re: Is it me or do the Eagles have no talent? they fight remember that they aint no punks they took us to the wire with those so called scrubs

03-20-2006, 08:24 AM	#6
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,832	Re: Is it me or do the Eagles have no talent? The Eagles will enter the season as easily the worst team in the East, but I think they are still dangerous. Maybe not the yearly contender they used to be, but with a healthy McNabb they'll be able to compete. They still have major problems at WR and that will hold them back. And then there's the non-existent running game, both in terms of a 20+ carry a game back and a overall lack of committment by Reid to pounding the ball. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

03-20-2006, 08:26 AM	#8
Drift Reality Impact Rookie Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 506	Re: Is it me or do the Eagles have no talent? Don't ever count them out. Football isn't a game of individuals, it is about a team - how it gels and how these guys work together. The Eagles had one good year after five of dominance, so I'd be careful before discounting them anytime soon. __________________ Drift Reality DC City Blog New Influencer

03-20-2006, 09:11 AM	#9
PWNED The Starter Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: ZOMGZZZ!!111 Age: 33 Posts: 1,160	Re: Is it me or do the Eagles have no talent? i also think that our offense is due for an explosion. if everyone gels and we stay healthy, the skins offense has the talent to be top 3, if not the top. we have more weapons than the colts and if brunell can just hit the open guy, no defense shoudl be able to plan for us. __________________ 143 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal.

03-20-2006, 11:31 AM	#14
Skins_4_Lyfe Special Teams Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Upper Marlboro, MD/Greensboro, NC Age: 37 Posts: 482	Re: Is it me or do the Eagles have no talent? What the hell was Peter King talking about...he mentioned the Eagles and Cowboys and failed to mention the Skins...we're better off than the Giants too if you ask me. __________________ WARRIOR

Is it me or do the Eagles have no talent?

Locker Room Main Forum