NFL Live top 5 receiver tandems

GTripp0012 · 08-09-2006, 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

What about Randy Moss and Jerry Porter in Oakland?

Porter has a weird situation. He hasnt produced and he is unhappy with his role. The potential there, but I wouldn't put the Raiders in the top ten since Porter isn't helping his team.

SmootSmack · 08-09-2006, 01:38 AM

One to watch out for this year could be Andre Johnson and Eric Moulds. I think Carr will really step it up under Kubiak this year and he's got two good receivers to help him.

saden1 · 08-09-2006, 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

What about Randy Moss and Jerry Porter in Oakland?

Porter wants out of of Oakland, plus he is way up there in age.

Lets not get ahead of ourselves folks. We Brandon Lloyd as our #2 which isn't saying a lot. Keyshawn is prove even though he whine quite a bit. As for Dallas, Glen is certainly better than our #2, well, a surer player anyways.

SmootSmack · 08-09-2006, 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saden1

Porter wants out of of Oakland, plus he is way up there in age.

Lets not get ahead of ourselves folks. We Brandon Lloyd as our #2 which isn't saying a lot. Keyshawn is prove even though he whine quite a bit. As for Dallas, Glen is certainly better than our #2, well, a surer player anyways.

Porter just turned 28. That's not all that old. Plus he wanted out of Oakland last year too and he still put decent numbers. Granted, he's done better.

SmootSmack · 08-09-2006, 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saden1

Porter wants out of of Oakland, plus he is way up there in age.

Lets not get ahead of ourselves folks. We Brandon Lloyd as our #2 which isn't saying a lot. Keyshawn is prove even though he whine quite a bit. As for Dallas, Glen is certainly better than our #2, well, a surer player anyways.

Porter just turned 28. That's not all that old. Plus he wanted out of Oakland last year too and he still put decent numbers. Granted, he's done better (in terms of yards and touchdowns)

huntz · 08-09-2006, 02:47 AM

Ariz 1 with Fitz and Bolden, right? Just think you have to take into consideration where a "tandem" takes a team, and so far, Ariz "tandem" hasn't taken them anywhere! So how can they be ranked higher than Carolina or Dallas?

Redskins8588 · 08-09-2006, 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by huntz

Ariz 1 with Fitz and Bolden, right? Just think you have to take into consideration where a "tandem" takes a team, and so far, Ariz "tandem" hasn't taken them anywhere! So how can they be ranked higher than Carolina or Dallas?

Ok, but you are putting too much just on the receivers. Ari has not had an O-line since forever and lets not for get about not having a running game and yet Boldin and Fritzgerald still both put up 1400 yard seasons each. Given the state that the team is in that is still pretty amazing!!

huntz · 08-09-2006, 03:09 AM

Guess we will see if Fitz and Bolden are the best this season given James now on the team. Have they improved the O-line? And can Warner stay healthy until Linhert shows? It'll be worth watching.

Redskins8588 · 08-09-2006, 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by huntz

Guess we will see if Fitz and Bolden are the best this season given James now on the team. Have they improved the O-line? And can Warner stay healthy until Linhert shows? It'll be worth watching.

If anything one would think that James should do well with having two pro-bowl type recievers on the outside. I should open up some lanes for him, and they did draft that o-line man from USC. I agree that the big question is Warners durability...

dmek25 · 08-09-2006, 07:09 AM

what the hecks going on with all the double postings?

freddyg12 · 08-09-2006, 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

What about Randy Moss and Jerry Porter in Oakland?

damn good point, how did they miss them?

TheMalcolmConnection · 08-09-2006, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by canthetuna

I don't think we're number one, but I definately dont think TO and Glenn could be put in a category above us. If they're basing on numbers they should combine TO and glenns numbers last year... dont add up to much...

Pure numbers could be the only explaination for not mentioning Moss and Lloyd together... and Lloyd's starting QB for most of last year finished with like 1 td and 11 ints... right??

F the naysayers... our offense is loaded and they could put a drunk monkey at QB this year and have him heave balls blindly out there and we'd have at least 2 1000 yard recievers and a 1500 yd rusher....

Right. If they're not considering how crappy SAN FRANCISCO'S offense was when considering Lloyd, why not consider the fact TO only played a third of a season? Bullshit.

superskins · 08-10-2006, 05:37 PM

didn't espn rank them in the top 5 of the receiving category on sportscenter like a month ago?

Bandwagon · 08-10-2006, 06:11 PM

Aren't we looking at the wrong thing? What is this "tandem" crap? For you young whippersnappers who have brain freeze, we had the BEST trandam, just made that up, but I mean we had the best THREE, (3 for you folks in Rio Linda), best receivers in the league; Monk,Clark and Sanders (ask Denver). That's where we are today so forget about tandems! GO WITH THREE!

Pocket$ $traight · 08-10-2006, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saden1

Porter wants out of of Oakland, plus he is way up there in age.

Lets not get ahead of ourselves folks. We Brandon Lloyd as our #2 which isn't saying a lot. Keyshawn is prove even though he whine quite a bit. As for Dallas, Glen is certainly better than our #2, well, a surer player anyways.

You rather have Terry Glenn than Brandon Lloyd? I completely disagree.

Lloyd makes catches that Glenn couldn't dream about and his whole career is in front of him. Glenn was washed up 3 years ago. Last year was a fluke.

08-09-2006, 01:38 AM	#17
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: NFL Live top 5 receiver tandems One to watch out for this year could be Andre Johnson and Eric Moulds. I think Carr will really step it up under Kubiak this year and he's got two good receivers to help him. __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

08-09-2006, 02:47 AM	#21
huntz Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Harrisburg, PA Age: 68 Posts: 311	Re: NFL Live top 5 receiver tandems Ariz 1 with Fitz and Bolden, right? Just think you have to take into consideration where a "tandem" takes a team, and so far, Ariz "tandem" hasn't taken them anywhere! So how can they be ranked higher than Carolina or Dallas?

08-09-2006, 03:09 AM	#23
huntz Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Harrisburg, PA Age: 68 Posts: 311	Re: NFL Live top 5 receiver tandems Guess we will see if Fitz and Bolden are the best this season given James now on the team. Have they improved the O-line? And can Warner stay healthy until Linhert shows? It'll be worth watching.

08-09-2006, 07:09 AM	#25
dmek25 MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 63 Posts: 10,672	Re: NFL Live top 5 receiver tandems what the hecks going on with all the double postings? __________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan

08-10-2006, 05:37 PM	#28
superskins Special Teams Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 218	Re: NFL Live top 5 receiver tandems didn't espn rank them in the top 5 of the receiving category on sportscenter like a month ago?

08-10-2006, 06:11 PM	#29
Bandwagon Camp Scrub Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 59	Re: NFL Live top 5 receiver tandems Aren't we looking at the wrong thing? What is this "tandem" crap? For you young whippersnappers who have brain freeze, we had the BEST trandam, just made that up, but I mean we had the best THREE, (3 for you folks in Rio Linda), best receivers in the league; Monk,Clark and Sanders (ask Denver). That's where we are today so forget about tandems! GO WITH THREE!

NFL Live top 5 receiver tandems

Locker Room Main Forum