![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: B-More, the backdoor for the Redskins Community
Age: 45
Posts: 1,087
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
McNab is about to make me lose the fantasy football
__________________
Maybe in order to understand mankind we have to look at that word itself. MANKIND. Basically, it's made up of two separate words "mank"and "ind." What do these words mean? It's a mystery and that's why so is mankind. --Jack Handy Deep Thoughts |
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#17 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
are you Woodbrdge WarDogs? Because if you are, you've already lost
![]()
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: B-More, the backdoor for the Redskins Community
Age: 45
Posts: 1,087
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
no
__________________
Maybe in order to understand mankind we have to look at that word itself. MANKIND. Basically, it's made up of two separate words "mank"and "ind." What do these words mean? It's a mystery and that's why so is mankind. --Jack Handy Deep Thoughts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: B-More, the backdoor for the Redskins Community
Age: 45
Posts: 1,087
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
Now i lost b/c i was going against Mcnab/ Phi Defense=--- I hate the Eagles
__________________
Maybe in order to understand mankind we have to look at that word itself. MANKIND. Basically, it's made up of two separate words "mank"and "ind." What do these words mean? It's a mystery and that's why so is mankind. --Jack Handy Deep Thoughts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: B-More, the backdoor for the Redskins Community
Age: 45
Posts: 1,087
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
McNab just set a record that 24 passes in the first 4 games were for gains of 20yards or more.
I'll say again, the Eagles are a team to be reckoned with. I just dont see how, they have a roster full of "Taylor Jacobs'" (does anyone think that name will ever be mentioned in the NFL again?haha)
__________________
Maybe in order to understand mankind we have to look at that word itself. MANKIND. Basically, it's made up of two separate words "mank"and "ind." What do these words mean? It's a mystery and that's why so is mankind. --Jack Handy Deep Thoughts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: B-More, the backdoor for the Redskins Community
Age: 45
Posts: 1,087
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
Damnit, 2nd time this year a team just gives the game over to the Eagles in the 2nd half
__________________
Maybe in order to understand mankind we have to look at that word itself. MANKIND. Basically, it's made up of two separate words "mank"and "ind." What do these words mean? It's a mystery and that's why so is mankind. --Jack Handy Deep Thoughts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: B-More, the backdoor for the Redskins Community
Age: 45
Posts: 1,087
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
Packers are disgusting, cant stop a team full T.Jacobs', D.MCants,R.Gardner's and they are going to finish with a 3-1 record son of B--------
__________________
Maybe in order to understand mankind we have to look at that word itself. MANKIND. Basically, it's made up of two separate words "mank"and "ind." What do these words mean? It's a mystery and that's why so is mankind. --Jack Handy Deep Thoughts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
Well, I have McNabb and I was losing by 15 points...now I'm up by 13.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
This is awful, Favre should have retired.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
With McNabb back, unfortunately, it's a whole different race for the NFC East crown this year. The Skins can't afford to lose anymore division games. Let's start with beating up on the giants Sunday.
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 68
Posts: 322
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
And what do we do if an official throws a flag, hits a player in the eye, and knocks him out of football?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
real yawner. the iggles were terrible in the first half, but GB is REALLY bad. as beat up as philly's secondary is, GB should have gotten a lot more yards.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Closet Redskins Fan
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 495
|
Re: Packers Vs. Eagles
Not impressed with the Eagles at all.
Their line didn't seem to apply pressure to Brett till late in the third. Their ST coverage was mediocre - GB started at the 25 or greater most of the time. This Eagle team still cannot run the ball with authority. Keep McNabb in the pocket and their running game disappears. Donald Driver is about as overrated as can be. Drop, drop, drop, catch. Favre seemed to hang his WR's out to dry, setting them up to get walloped by Dawkins. GB is not a good team right now and they should have been leading at the half. Dallas goes up there on Sunday and wins 31 - 14 going away. Westbrook or not.
__________________
I am a complete and unabashed Romosexual. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|