![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Our staff already has some fiery coaches. Williams, Lindsey, and Saunders, are all guys that bark and get on their players. In the end things like pep talks and yelling and screaming only goes so far.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#17 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 58
Posts: 67
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
If an employee at any job wasnt up to par in their duties and was constantly being told he had better do a better job or else but no repercussions came from it 9 times outta 10 that person would continue to do half assed work because he knows he can get away with it. But if the CEO,president whatever the case may be came in and said look ya slack bastard do your job right or your will be demoted,fired,etc... It may change their tune.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Quote:
Now, I would like to see the players such as Mark Brunell be fired up during the game. I think that would inspire his teammates. With no Skins game yesterday, I watched Michael Vick play. He really was into the game yesterday. And, he led his team to victory against a 4-2 Bengals team at home. The QB needs to be a leader, not someone who goes through the motions.
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 58
Posts: 67
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
You are right. Just assumptions. But it would be nice (dont have to see it) but to at least hear about some ass chewings. I mean from anyone,Saunders,Gibbs,Snyder even.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
huh, what? people want Jason Campbell as coach now?
![]()
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,348
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Why not JC?
Romo has been in the same system for 4 years. Campbell is in a different for his 7th consecutive year(including 5 years at Auburn). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
the clipboard system?
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 215
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
[quote=firstdown;236316]
quote] No one said anything about the Fox5 report whether Gibbs is limiting AS to only some plays from his playbook. I believe it because all I've seen from the redskins this season is the same old dinks and dunks for short gains. I am a firm beliver that once your offense starts clicking your D just plays better for some reason. I think if the offense could do something the Redskins D is actaully a solid one, I think they are on the fields for too long. That same Fox5 report said that this might be the last season for Gibbs as a head coach of the Redskins pending the outcome at the end of the season. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Quote:
Now, if the switch is made, and Campbell struggles (or worse), I'd go back to Brunell for the road series, allow JC to regain his confidence, and give him his first career start in week 12. But at home vs our division rival, I think MB will play pretty well. If he plays his game and the D shows any improvement whatsoever, we will walk away with a much needed W.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 53
Posts: 960
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
[QUOTE=TheBigD;236320]
Quote:
Our defense and offense are not helping each other, the Skins inconsistent offense has led to our defense being asked to do too much and the defense's inability to force turnovers has led to our offense being asked to generate too many long drives to score points. Its a chicken and egg argument with me, but we clearly need one unit to give us a spark and carry us and so far they've both underdelivered. How Romo and Brunell each perform on Sunday will have a lot to do with when JC sees game action. If Romo outplays Brunell, then maybe he'll consider working JC into the gameplan. If Romo craps the bed, then JC will remain in mothballs, right next to David Patten, corner blitzes, TJ Duckett, and 690 pages of Saunders' playbook. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,363
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Ok the reason I belive JC isn't starting yet it's that Gibbs just doesn't think he's ready or Campbell hasn't showed him in practice he manages this system (hey Brunnel doesn't either but still).
As 1 pointed out Campbell didn't show a lot in preseason against backups maybe his just 2 green. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Campbell is very green. But there's only one way to make him less green: Let him play! Preferrably ASAP.
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 41
Posts: 937
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Quote:
Romo looked good in preseason, Campbell didn't Romo has been in the league 4 years, Campbell just two Romo gets rid of the ball early, Campbell doesnt Tough to compare these two guys, Romo is much better prepared
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|