![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 56
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
The obvious ansewer is that the underneath receivers were open, but the Rams took away the long pass. We burned them with the underneath stuff and scored 31 points. We should win games when we score 31 points. Cooley was opened all day, and Moss was open on the comebacks. If the Rams understand how to defend anything it should be the long ball with the guys they see in practice every day.
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#17 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Quote:
Right now if you take away our deep passing game, the entire passing game becomes inconsistent. Yeah we had 4 good drives today (24 pts, not going to credit the offense for scoring off that blocked punt), but we have 4+ good drives every game. The difference is that today, we finished those and put it in the endzone. Instead of 1 TD and 3 FGs (16 pts), we got 1 FG and 3 TDs (24 pts). That's encouraging.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
In order for us to become a good offensive team we are going to have to get the ball in our playmakers hands. We have great WR's. Let's not overthink this. JC is young and is learning but is having a hard time getting the ball out to the WR's consistently. We have turned the corner in regards to running the ball now we've got to improve in the explosive play of our WR's.
IMO, it's not that their not open. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Quote:
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D.C. area
Posts: 179
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Quote:
Just because we paid lots of money for receivers does not mean it was a wise investment. Our receivers are the jokes of the league but as I said in another thread, there is nothing wrong with disagreeing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 372
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Quote:
Lloyd- 6 ft. 192lbs Moss- 5'10 185lbs ARE - 5'10 192lbs Marvin Harrison - 6ft 185 Reggie Wayne - 6ft -198 Chad Johnson - 6'1 192lbs TJ whosyourmama - 6'1 199lbs So we are a little small, but what they lack in size they make up for in other skills. I am not totally trying to discount having a big receiver, all of KC's receivers were close to 200lb or more, so maybe Saunders is used to working with big guys, and on the Cardinals LJ weighs 226 and Boldin weighs 223, freakin huge. Plus we used to have a big guy at receiver, his name is Rod Gardner, he didn't do much. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D.C. area
Posts: 179
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Quote:
And we had another big guy and his name was Arthur Monk. Remember him? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Before we blame the recievers, let's remember that JC is developing on the job. I recall reading that he still throws too late on many routes, waits for recievers to get open & then throws, rather than throwing in their break they way the play is designed. Sometimes recievers are only open for a short window before the play breaks down. That said, our wr's don't seem to do a good job of coming back to the ball when the route is over. I would've expected ARE to get more short passes coming back for the ball.
Unless Loyd shows great improvement next year, I don't see him as being a dependable wr. He'll make a big catch now & then, but doesn't seem to be in tune w/the O most of the time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Their size is not the problem its the fact that the coaches pulled Brunell just when he was starting to hit his WR's for a QB with no experence.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D.C. area
Posts: 179
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Please take a look at successful passing team receiver mix a bigger receiver is a definite need. I think that pulling Brunell was a mistake also. Some people are riding high on Campbell and knocking Brunell when Brunell was actually having a better season that Campbell is producing for us, which proves to me that beauty IS in the eye of the beholder.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 372
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D.C. area
Posts: 179
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Quote:
And oh by the way Cooley is not a WR |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D.C. area
Posts: 179
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|