![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
Something tells me it would be awfully hard to pry their 2nd round pick away. I'm thinking a 3rd would be reasonable, as people have already suggested above.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 152
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
Quote:
Or Briggs, A. Spencer (DE Purdue) or Harrell (DT Tenn) at 31, and the best DT or S available in the third. The latter seems a little better to me. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
Unless we totally rape the Bears on this deal, I wouldn't do it. I'm tired of the Skins getting the short end of deals or barely breaking even.
Shit, throw in Kyle Orton or something!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
Man I thought that the skins were trying to be more cap conscious this year and in the future. Signing a 3rd starting caliber WLB for 7 mil a year does not go under that category.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
I thought it was the Bears who were firm on getting another pick with this deal -- not the other way around.
It all depends on who is more desperate. And if past performance is any indicator of the future, we know which team that generally turns out to be. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
I dont think that we could possibly get anything more than just swapping picks. We will not get another draft pick. This is because we already offered just swapping picks once, so the Bears know that we are willing to do this, and they will probably take nothing less. The only way I see us getting more picks is by throwing another player in the trade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
Quote:
JLC seems to hint that the Skins could be trying to extract another pick. Quote:
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 61
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
Didn't Gibbs trade two second round picks to move up and select McIntosh as our future weakside LB??? I'd rather give Rocky a chance to develop. He's far cheaper than Briggs will be, and that money saved could be used to bolster the D-line, the real weakness of this defense.
Briggs looks great playing behind the best D-line in the NFC, not to mention playing next to Urlacher. How would he look behind our seive of a D-line? My biggest concern is that he has been a product of the talented players around him. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
JLC's article in todays Wash.Post on the prospective trade for Briggs further illustrates the Redskins long-practicing desire to trade 1st round picks for established players. Since they obviously feel there is no one at #6 who will make an immediate impact, this trade for Briggs from their perspective is attractive.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
My response is to the "we could only get their third is" - "Well, we don't need Briggs, he is a big talent - but if you want us to take him off your hands give us your first and second. You want Rocky? Tell you what, you throw in ur third, we'll throw in Marshall".
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
I keep hearing rumors that Spencer is going to go somewhere in the 1st round, possibly to Dallas. Granted, they are just rumors, but Spencer is getting a lot of air time lately.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
This will not happen...this is just Drew R. leaking a "story" to the Post. Trying to get some buzz going to influence his potential payday. Drew is desperate to get something done and the Post is desperate for some sort of inside story on the 'skins since they know longer have the access they did pre Snyder. Not worth the speculation.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
Quote:
I have never bees on board with this trade from the beginning, so I hope what you're saying is right.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
Watch us get Arch back in a trade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 41
Posts: 937
|
Re: Here we go again with Briggs
Briggs would be a disastrous deal no matter how you look at it. The guy makes a whole lot of money, and played along Brian Urlacher...not london fletcher.
If we just go through the motions and make our draft picks for the next few years, we will get our turn at the playoffs, instead we take shortcuts and dig ourselves bigger holes we need dan snyder to stop talking to Drew Rosenhouse, and we need Dan Snyder never play a role in picking players ever again, then we would be ok
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|