![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Saden's Team Most Likely to Win their Division Poll | |||
Miami |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 7.89% |
Cleveland |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 2.63% |
Houston |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 0.88% |
Oakland |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 0.88% |
Detroit |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 11.40% |
Tampa Bay |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
36 | 31.58% |
Arizona |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
51 | 44.74% |
Voters: 114. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Probably none of the above...not likely for any of those teams to win their division
Who is Nick Naban? |
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#17 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Quote:
__________________
Tardy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 68
Posts: 311
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Cards seem to making smart moves the last few seasons and getting rid of Green was best thing they could have done. They've got a shot at first with better coaching.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Quote:
after preseason the skins will be favored by 10
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
i pick tampa as having the best shot to win it's division.
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
I get where you're coming from, but I actually hope that isn't the case. Reason being, I hope none of our starters play more than a quarter in any of the preseason games. We were so hurt by injury last year. Hurt by injury. Ha.
__________________
Tardy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
i also hope the starters don't play too much but i'm sure they'll play a little, especially in the 3rd preseason game. i'm just hoping that they look crisp for however much they do play.
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Tampa is not a very good team in my mind, but then again, thats not a great division this year. I could see a second place finish, and maaaaaybe a 6 seed for them.
Petitgout will help them out a lot. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
i think the lions. mainly because of a weak division( yes, i think the bears come crashing down) and mike martz. after playing a full season in that offense, they will be scoring some points. kind of like the skins
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Geesh...I don't think any of them can win their division, but I'll pick the Cards. They have the most talent.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
I don't think the Lions are a bad pick, but man, have they done and outstandingly horrible job drafting over the past 6 years.
A random number generator could have done better and I'm being completely serious. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Quote:
My non-biased sleeper team is Packers and Jaguars
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Jags are my AFC superbowl pick. If they keep Leftwich or sign Culpepper it doesn't matter, both of those guys are great when healthy.
Packers offense makes me want to throw up. But that defense will keep them in games in a weak conference. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Quote:
I really like Greg Jennings and Brandon Jackson and Vernan Morrency are a decent 1-2 punch for them. Super Bowl for Jags no but they will push Indy for the division title. My Super Bowl prediction Redskins 34 Broncos 21
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|