![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
Quote:
Good points. The defense generally is ahead of the game at this point in the season; the offense is much more timing oriented. That being said, let's look at Pucillo tonight to see how he fairs against an aggresive defense. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#17 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 54
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
They have their work cut out again. I'd hate to have to pass block against those guys. They come from every which way. We shall see what happens. What I hate is that if they suck again it will be a full blown media thing this week. What's wrong with the offense? You get one pass in the pre-season, I guess, befor the hyenas start gathering. It would be better to avoid all that even if they really are going to suck.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
Quote:
Of course, the Redskins could solve that by coming out and kicking ass tonight. I guess that would be asking too much though, from this team. In preseason, they always seem to give everybody watching plenty of reason for doubt. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
Quote:
I would really like to see the offense put together two or three nice drives. Even if we don't score a ton of points, march down field for once. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: round the way
Age: 42
Posts: 2,211
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
one thing is for sure, if we dont draft a O-lineman in the 1st or 2nd round next year, we are screwed.
__________________
SOMEBODY PINCH ME |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bluffton, South Carolina
Posts: 803
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
I say we put Mike Pucillo in over Todd Wade because Mike Pucillo is actually accustomed to being a guard.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
Well clearly Pucillo makes this team. He gives us depth at C and G and looked just fine tonight.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
Yes, there was clear improvement from last week to tonight. Wasn't Campbell sacked like three times against the Titans in the first quarter or so?
There was far better O-line protection -- hopefully Pucillo is the missing piece of the puzzle. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
You have to figure that Wade is now behind simply by missing this game. They still haven't had time to really evaluate him at the position.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
I'll preface this by saying that I was a huge fan of moving Wade to G. The raves he got last year and his performance when he played showed he is at worst a decent NFL RT. That couple with the supposed easyness of the G position made me believe that a decent T could probably be a decent G. I mean G is supposed to be the easiest position on the field.
I started becoming concerned when the rhetoric about Wade switched from "Man he looks great in practice" to "Well his is making a tough adjustment and he is working hard on overcoming the difficulties." Seems to me that it really shouldn't be all that hard. Now that the rhetoric has not changed and he is missing time I am pretty much convinced he can't do it. Just a gut feeling but I think this experiment ends soon. Too bad whit got hurt like he did. I suspect he could have been decent for us. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 110
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
NEXT choice plz ....?
I hope Wade will be able to make the transition, only these next few games will tell, IMO they are probually about even, below average at this point. It will be great to get CS back! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: va
Age: 58
Posts: 890
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
either way we will have a problem there this year
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
Quote:
However, no matter how you look at it, we're going to miss Dock. Not saying we should have paid him that type of money, but we are defintley taking a huge step down at that position, and I think we'll see that while Dockery may not be an elite gaurd, he's much better than "average" like many people want to belive.
__________________
#21 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade
Quote:
If we struggle with the three time pro-bowler in, then I will worry. Right now I like what I saw from last week to this one. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|