Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"

Big C · 02-27-2009, 10:13 AM

why so dissapointed on canty? 10 career sacks in 4 seasons, i realize he was a 3-4 defensive end, but i think it would have been a gamble to get him too. id rather use the money elsewhere if we have any left

TheMalcolmConnection · 02-27-2009, 10:42 AM

I'm thinking now that if we sign another lineman, I think we move back in the draft and take Mack or Robinson.

steveo395 · 02-27-2009, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I was really hoping we could work some magic and fit Canty in. I was daydreaming of a starting d-line of Haynesworth, Canty, Griffin, and Taylor.

Why does everyone love Canty so much? He barely did anything in Dallas. Carter is better than Canty.

Schneed10 · 02-27-2009, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Man, do they love him that much that they are willing to risk not addressing the offensive line?

Well there you have it, he's being released. They definitely recognize the need to get younger on the lines (especially headed into an uncapped world) is more valuable than having Springs around for just a season more or two.

I like the move, I'm just surprised they were able to part with a player the coaches loved so much. Good job by the front office in making a business decision.

GMScud · 02-27-2009, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Well there you have it, he's being released. They definitely recognize the need to get younger on the lines (especially headed into an uncapped world) is more valuable than having Springs around for just a season more or two.

I like the move, I'm just surprised they were able to part with a player the coaches loved so much. Good job by the front office in making a business decision.

I think we could have (and wanted to) keep Springs around if he would have restructrured like everyone else over 30 on our roster. He refused to take any kind of pay cut. I seriously doubt he finds $6M per year anywhere else.

MTK · 02-27-2009, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveo395

Why does everyone love Canty so much? He barely did anything in Dallas. Carter is better than Canty.

Canty might not have the pretty sack numbers but that could easily change in a 4-3 where he wouldn't be as occupied with taking on blocks, and he's very stout against the run.

SBXVII · 02-27-2009, 11:40 AM

I guess I just figured we would be letting Springs go cause we signed Hall and Canty was a move that might be replacing Taylor or taking up Springs money.

SmootSmack · 02-27-2009, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMScud

I think we could have (and wanted to) keep Springs around if he would have restructrured like everyone else over 30 on our roster. He refused to take any kind of pay cut. I seriously doubt he finds $6M per year anywhere else.

There's a difference between a restructure and a pay cut. Redskins had wanted Springs to take a straight cut.

GMScud · 02-27-2009, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

There's a difference between a restructure and a pay cut. Redskins had wanted Springs to take a straight cut.

I understand that. I guess I'm just kind of confused. We've restructured older, oft-injured players (Griffin most recently) in the past to help lessen our immediate salary cap issues. I guess I just don't understand why we never went that route with Springs. Is he not more valuable to the defense when healthy than Griffin?

Paintrain · 02-27-2009, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMScud

I understand that. I guess I'm just kind of confused. We've restructured older, oft-injured players (Griffin most recently) in the past to help lessen our immediate salary cap issues. I guess I just don't understand why we never went that route with Springs. Is he not more valuable to the defense when healthy than Griffin?

I'd say if we didn't resign Hall he would be more valuable but right now he's kind of a redundant player. Hall brings the same skill set, size and better playmaking ability but he's 9 years younger. If we didn't have Horton I could see us restructuring and extending Springs as our starting safety but we don't really have a fit for him.

steveo395 · 02-27-2009, 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Canty might not have the pretty sack numbers but that could easily change in a 4-3 where he wouldn't be as occupied with taking on blocks, and he's very stout against the run.

I just think you might as well just resign Evans if you want a player like that. Yeah, Canty is a little younger, but he would be more of a gamble because he's never played in the 4-3 and we probably would have had to pay him more.

But none of this even matters anymore because we're not getting him anyway.

GMScud · 02-27-2009, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paintrain

I'd say if we didn't resign Hall he would be more valuable but right now he's kind of a redundant player. Hall brings the same skill set, size and better playmaking ability but he's 9 years younger. If we didn't have Horton I could see us restructuring and extending Springs as our starting safety but we don't really have a fit for him.

I hear what you're saying. I wasn't suggesting we should have kept Springs for 2009, I was just kind of wondering why we never took the restructure route with him considering the past two season his cap # has been an issue.

SmootSmack · 02-27-2009, 02:25 PM

New York Giants to take a look at another free-agent defensive lineman: Chris Canty - New York Giants Football - NJ.com

GridIron26 · 02-27-2009, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

New York Giants to take a look at another free-agent defensive lineman: Chris Canty - New York Giants Football - NJ.com

Geez, if he signs w/ Giants then we better magic up our O-line men..

GTripp0012 · 02-27-2009, 02:40 PM

I know the Giants value DL depth above all else, but where in the world would he play in that defense? Three-technique?

02-27-2009, 10:13 AM	#16
Big C Mr. Brightside Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 39 Posts: 4,453	Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now" why so dissapointed on canty? 10 career sacks in 4 seasons, i realize he was a 3-4 defensive end, but i think it would have been a gamble to get him too. id rather use the money elsewhere if we have any left __________________ "I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs

02-27-2009, 10:42 AM	#17
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,264	Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now" I'm thinking now that if we sign another lineman, I think we move back in the draft and take Mack or Robinson. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

02-27-2009, 11:40 AM	#22
SBXVII Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia Posts: 7,766	Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now" I guess I just figured we would be letting Springs go cause we signed Hall and Canty was a move that might be replacing Taylor or taking up Springs money.

02-27-2009, 02:25 PM	#28
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now" New York Giants to take a look at another free-agent defensive lineman: Chris Canty - New York Giants Football - NJ.com __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

02-27-2009, 02:40 PM	#30
GTripp0012 Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 37 Posts: 15,994	Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now" I know the Giants value DL depth above all else, but where in the world would he play in that defense? Three-technique? __________________ according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"

Locker Room Main Forum