Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Who Will Be the #5 WR?
Keith Eloi 1 0.64%
DJ Hackett 26 16.67%
Marques Hagans 6 3.85%
Marko Mitchell 122 78.21%
Trent Shelton 1 0.64%
Voters: 156. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-21-2009, 12:34 AM   #1
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

I remember this dude when MD. played his team in a bowl game. If I remember correctly he killed MD. But it's one thing to do it in practice. Let's see what he does in a game. Remember Tryon was having a great camp until he had to actually play in a game.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 01:50 AM   #2
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

I remember being impressed when I looked at the incremental increase in his college numbers over 3 years as a starter, but I figured he would just get caught up in the training camp wash. Now, I'm not so sure. I think he's got a good shot to make the team.

Marko Mitchell might be the anti-Devin Thomas. Shame on you if you get that.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 06:56 AM   #3
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

Seems like Trent Shelton is a pretty much a non-factor, huh?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 08:52 AM   #4
44Deezel
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

I believe he's officially listed at 218LBS, but who knows for sure.

BTW, is it just me or does Fred Davis' neck and head look way to small for his body?
__________________
I am a system poster.
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 09:22 AM   #5
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

I always wanted a Rack. I always thought it would stretch your back out really good and loosen you up but they're so hard to find and take up a lot of space.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 10:34 AM   #6
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

10:52:11 am QB Chase Daniel connected with WR Marko Mitchell on long TD pass during the 9-on-9. On the play, CB Kevin Barnes bit on a Daniel pump fake to leave Mitchell wide open.

Daniel to Mitchell is the future!!
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 10:45 AM   #7
KLHJ2
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 47
Posts: 5,829
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
10:52:11 am QB Chase Daniel connected with WR Marko Mitchell on long TD pass during the 9-on-9. On the play, CB Kevin Barnes bit on a Daniel pump fake to leave Mitchell wide open.

Daniel to Mitchell is the future!!
That's awsome! Especially since it's only 10:45. What foresight you have.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 10:46 AM   #8
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angry View Post
That's awsome! Especially since it's only 10:45. What foresight you have.
LOL. That was from yesterday of course
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 10:51 AM   #9
KLHJ2
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 47
Posts: 5,829
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
LOL. That was from yesterday of course
If only I had remembered that training camp ended yesterday. :confused:
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 11:17 AM   #10
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

His route running must be exceptional with all these praises he is getting. You don't expect that from rookies. But lets be honest here, all this noise is in practice. He'll probably be a practice squad player.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 11:52 AM   #11
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

I was trying to decide between Hackett and Mitchell.

Hackett knows the offense and has been decently productive WHEN healthy in the past, but that's the key, he could be seen as injury-prone.

Mitchell has size and many more years left without the injury risk. He was a big playmaker in college and is impressing in camp. It appears we got great value for taking him so late in the draft. Since he's so young and has more potential than Hackett, where we know what we'll get, I chose Mitchell.

Even after Moss is gone, if our future is Thomas, Kelly and Mitchell, is a great trio who could be producing for many years.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 12:20 PM   #12
GridIron26
Playmaker
 
GridIron26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Age: 37
Posts: 3,590
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
Even after Moss is gone, if our future is Thomas, Kelly and Mitchell, is a great trio who could be producing for many years.
That would be awesome, but it only depends on their productions and if our FO decides to extend/resign them..
GridIron26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 12:24 PM   #13
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

I'm going with Trent Shelton in a stunner
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 12:32 PM   #14
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I'm going with Trent Shelton in a stunner
That would be a stunner.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 12:38 PM   #15
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,697
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell

I picked Marko for the poll, seems to me if he goes on the practice squad another team very well may get him. Hackett would probably be available if we ended up needing him in a bind even if we cut him.

Hagans and Eloi have to be dramatic over the next few weeks I imagine to stay on the team.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.48889 seconds with 11 queries