![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,501
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Mild interest cause some of those teams aren't serious about winning. They're not going to do everything it takes to win. Pulling off a trade like this takes balls and it takes people in the FO that REALLY want to win. If SF makes a trade for McNabb ( gives up their 1st rounder) they're the outright favorite to take their division. Instead they're going to go with a below average QB that's done nothing since he's been in the NFL. Arizona lets Rolle and Dansby walk cause they don't want to pay anyone. And WTF is Denver thinking? They've got some real solid skill guys yet they're going to go w/ Orton and Quinn but not make a play on McNabb?? Snyder has done some shitty moves over the years but I will never question his will to win. And these guys...Shanahan and Allen didn't come here to make the playoffs. They're thinking Super Bowl. I respect that and I trust them. We'll see if they're going about it the right way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Quote:
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
They also thought Roy Williams (WR) was their savior and trashtalked when the team drafted a kicker last season.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Yeah, what the hell do they know anyway!
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Quote:
The only Cowboys fan I have respect for is that guy who banged that chick out in the restroom of the JerraDome. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,713
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Wow,
Not about the trade, but the way posting went, That was an incredibly ferocious thread! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 4,101
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
This is the way I see the trade....
Campbell + Zorn < McNabb + Shanahan |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Simple yet effective post
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Draft picks retained: not relevant.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Colt McCoy: not relevant.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
youre not considering what could have been done with the 2nd round pick. How about this? Wait until the 37th pick is made in the draft and let us know if that player (or any player still available at that point) is better than McNabb.
At MOST, you could say there's a chance that a player available at that point could contribute more to the team over the next 3-4 years than McNabb. But not a single player available at that point - at any position - would be clearly better than McNabb. Yes, McNabb is not the long-term answer at QB. But the fact is, using a top draft pick on a quarterback would be the worst possible thing this team could do right now. Right now, if we drafted a QB, it would be by a coaching staff and GM in their first 4 months on the job. the scouts evaluating QB prospects are vinny cerrato holdovers awaiting unemployment. Finding a franchise QB in the NFL draft is one of (if not the) hardest things to do in all of professional sports. By trading for McNabb, we've bought ourselves a couple of years to find him. When we do, the task will be handled by a GM, head coach, and scouting department who have all been working together for at least one or two full seasons. And when we fiinally find that franchise QB, he'll be learning the ropes from a future Hall-of-Fame quarterback and not Jason Campbell or Rex Grossman. Unless McNabb really has absolutely nothing left in the tank, I simply don't understand how anyone can think the Skins made a bad move.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Fair enough, excellent way to frame it, BHA.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Quote:
I like the trade I guess, but I just have this feeling that Campbell could have put up some very nice numbers under Shanahan's tutelage.
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Perhaps, but it's also obviously relevant.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|