![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: Redskins' new faces mean competition for jobs will be intense
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#17 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,765
|
Re: Redskins' new faces mean competition for jobs will be intense
Quote:
He only had eight touchdowns of 50 yards-or-more which tied for an all time NFL league record. Jackson was also the league's top punt returner in 2009 and was second in the league in yards per catch. Yes he finished with only 62 catches, but for 1,156 yards and nine receiving touchdowns. In all, Jackson scored 12 touchdowns last season. Last year, Jackson became the first player in NFL history to be voted to the Pro Bowl at two different positions in the same year - wide receiver and returner. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Redskins' new faces mean competition for jobs will be intense
I thought I read somewhere that there was a mini camp soon, either this week or next? I guess the coach's will have their plates full trying to decide who stays and who goes by camp time.
Quote:
EDIT: Never mind I found it. May 7-9. Found it in your "Key dates to remember." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: Redskins' new faces mean competition for jobs will be intense
Quote:
I was talking about them as a group. GusFrerotte has been pumping them up a lot lately, I was just saying as a group I don't see where they live up to the hype he was giving them. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: Redskins' new faces mean competition for jobs will be intense
Sure they were more productive, they were in a pass happy offense with an established coach/QB combo. I love Jackson don't get me wrong.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|