Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


this team sucks

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-2004, 05:56 PM   #1
JWsleep
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 56
Posts: 4,719
Easy, now. Continuity is what we've lacked over the last 5 years. I hate losing, too. I go to a sportsbar every weekend where the opposing giant, cowboy, and iggle fans all know "hail to the redskins" and sing it at us when things go badly. Man, do I want to get my revenge on these morons. But the only way there is with patience and hard work. And we're pretty well tied down in terms of money anyway.

Keep getting better each week, find what works with the players we've got, and sit the players who don't give their all. Sometimes, chemistry takes time.
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 05:57 PM   #2
CROOKEDSKINS
Camp Scrub
 
CROOKEDSKINS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: KEY WEST FL
Age: 53
Posts: 93
i understand all the frustration i feel it too
but we will get back to the top
we need to get rid of gardner
coles is a playmaker he needs to get the toe fixed but in all fairness
the only time he gets the ball with some place to move is on the screens
i too would get rid of barrow, pierce is playing reallly solid
and re singing smoot is a must and tradeing portis is not an option
jansen will be back next year and hopefully we can have some continuity on the o line
all of the good o lines in the league have been playing together for awhile and in the same system.give it some time 1 more year wont kill weve been waiting 13 allready
CROOKEDSKINS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 06:16 PM   #3
bedlamVR
Special Teams
 
bedlamVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 389
If Samuels renegociates his contract to be more team friendly keep him he is still a V.Good LT. Remember this is a new blocking scheme for him too and he is starting next to the most inexperienced guy on the line. The only reason he didn't renegociate last year is because the team didn't really push it and he felt he was in a poor bargaining position having a down year and a year removed from the probowl.
bedlamVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 08:12 PM   #4
Redskins8588
Playmaker
 
Redskins8588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,519
Just curious but was Emmit Smith a system back? I tend to belive that he was. I am not trying to say that Protis is Emmit or anything, just seeing what people think.
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor
Redskins8588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 08:16 PM   #5
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
Hard to say 8588. Besides Arizona you never saw him in another pro system in his prime. I'm positive if he didn't have that line, fullback, and QB/Receiver threat that he wouldn't be today's all-time leading rusher.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 08:19 PM   #6
Redskins8588
Playmaker
 
Redskins8588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daseal
Hard to say 8588. Besides Arizona you never saw him in another pro system in his prime. I'm positive if he didn't have that line, fullback, and QB/Receiver threat that he wouldn't be today's all-time leading rusher.
Thats why I think that he was a system back, I mean in his prime put him in to another system and would he still be that dangerous??
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor
Redskins8588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 08:20 PM   #7
wolfeskins
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
yea i think he was a system back but a good one never the less. barry sanders on the other hand would have been successfull anywere. just my thoughts.
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 08:34 PM   #8
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by juggernaunt
we must cut the following players, brunnell, barrow, morton, and daniels. i know its ALOT of dead cap space for 2005 but it needs to be done. next is we need players who want to play, players who have a someting to prove, they are young players... that means Draft picks. something were lacking agina this year. i hope we dont win another game. Why you ask? cause mike willaims the top player in this draft can be trade bait, ie san diego chargers 2 #1's. trade samuels, moliona will be more than ready. trade gardener i dont care if its for a 4 or 5th rounder. if someone wants him trade portis(look at denver do they miss him)no. take the salary cap hit w/ that. we NEED to build within.
Trading two #1's (one of which will probably be around #12 and the other somewhere around #20) for our #3-6 would be a very good idea if San Diego would bite.

However, I don't see how you can say Molinaro would be ready to fill in for Samuels. What have you seen that I haven't? He hasn't seen the field all that much this year.
It would be pretty risky to put an unproven, 2nd year, former-7th rounder in at starting LT.

Get rid or Portis? Okay, now that's just crazy. First, we're going to take a cap hit of $10 million. Second, he's been running behind an offense that can't throw the ball more than 15 yards and so he's got 10 defensive players in his junk before the ball is snapped. Third, this is Clinton Portis; I think he's proven his mettle.

Trade Gardner for a 4th or 5th rounder? First, he doesn't have a high cap figure. Second, he is worth more than a 4th or 5th rounder. Third, most 4th or 5th rounders are lucky to be in the league for more than 4 years. Fourth, I like finding good picks in the lower rounds, but it's not that easy. Fifth, it's not Gardner's just isn't working in an otherwise brilliant offense.

Our current roster, coaches, and game plans aren't working, but you should figure out what is wrong before you go and make a bunch of hasty decisions. Cutting all those guys you mentioned would pretty much make this an expansion team next year (a bunch of guys working together for the first time). I understand the frustration, but come on, we need consistency not panicky moves that shake up the roster, coaching staff, and the entire organization.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 09:01 PM   #9
VTSkins897
Impact Rookie
 
VTSkins897's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 42
Posts: 890
agreed we are shit... but it will only take time... a few minor fixes but we cant yet again overhaul the team unless you're trying to suck for 3 more seasons. we'll be good again not next year, but the next after that with some continuity
VTSkins897 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 10:14 PM   #10
jermus22
Special Teams
 
jermus22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Frankfort, KY
Age: 43
Posts: 336
Lightbulb

I agree with all comments about not overhauling the entire team. Here are a few ideas for improving the team:

1. Unless Samuels accepts a major pay cut, trade him for a decent veteran qb. We don't need someone with an incredible arm or scrambling ability. Just a smart player with good accuracy and leadership skills. If Gibbs could turn Mark Rypien into a Super Bowl MVP and a Pro Bowler, he can certainly do it with a decent quarterback.

2. Use Gardner as part of the Samuels trade; we already have Thrash, McCants, and Jacobs. We have more than enough depth at that position, especially for a Gibbs offense.

3. Draft an offensive lineman or receiver in the first round (it depends on which position has the most talented player available). Use the second round to pick up the next position. Take a pash rushing de in the third round, someone we can send in on third and long. Use the final rounds to add depth at necessary positions.
__________________
Win it in the trenches.
jermus22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 10:29 PM   #11
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by juggernaunt
i have been a loyal redskin fan my entire life, but this team is run like a lemonade stand. we buy and buy everyear and what do we have to show for it nothing.... so Daniel if you read this, You Must Fire Vinny Cerrato.

again i'm gonna preach that we have to cut the fat. if this was any other business how many people would have lost there jobs by now. this is a productivity world and for the amount of money i'm paying i'm getting nothing in return. its time to step back and re-build. Rebuild within, that means people that we dont go out and just buy players. that idea has been tired for 5 years and it hasnt worked. we must cut the following players, brunnell, barrow, morton, and daniels. i know its ALOT of dead cap space for 2005 but it needs to be done. next is we need players who want to play, players who have a someting to prove, they are young players... that means Draft picks. something were lacking agina this year. i hope we dont win another game. Why you ask? cause mike willaims the top player in this draft can be trade bait, ie san diego chargers 2 #1's. trade samuels, moliona will be more than ready. trade gardener i dont care if its for a 4 or 5th rounder. if someone wants him trade portis(look at denver do they miss him)no. take the salary cap hit w/ that. we NEED to build within.

hey Joe get a REAL GM, someone who knows talent not how much air pressure is need or how much wench needs to be turned. i hate to be the bearer of bad news, but unless things change around here WE WILL NEVER WIN.

Well I agree with the fire Vinny part at least...
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 11:11 PM   #12
Skins fan 44
Impact Rookie
 
Skins fan 44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brazil, IN
Age: 54
Posts: 883
I dont know about who to drop. Hopefully we can get Samuels to rework again if not trade or waive him. Need a GM and need to do some seriors homework even if we have to hire Mel Kiper for the draft. With our first pick we should trade it for more picks like we did the year we got Ramsey. We really dont have the cap space to pay the high first round picks do we? This draft will be important this year due to probably not being able to sign the big name free agents like in the past.
__________________
HTTR!
Skins fan 44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 12:55 AM   #13
heybigstar
Special Teams
 
heybigstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 375
I really dont see Samuels restructuring his contract, but i was thinking about this tonight: If you look at the great O-lines in the league (Chiefs, Steelers, Ravens), they have been together for a longgg time. With all the problems we have with the O-line, which is the key to our team, can we realistically expect to improve a whole lot next season with a whole new O-line? I say we either draft a wr, and sign the best FA center available, so we have contiunity in Samuels Dockery and Randy Thomas and Jon Jansen on the 2 G's and 2t's, and throw in a top FA center to the mix and maybe we can have a good line?
__________________
Hail to the Redskins.
heybigstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 10:12 AM   #14
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by heybigstar
I really dont see Samuels restructuring his contract, but i was thinking about this tonight: If you look at the great O-lines in the league (Chiefs, Steelers, Ravens), they have been together for a longgg time. With all the problems we have with the O-line, which is the key to our team, can we realistically expect to improve a whole lot next season with a whole new O-line? I say we either draft a wr, and sign the best FA center available, so we have contiunity in Samuels Dockery and Randy Thomas and Jon Jansen on the 2 G's and 2t's, and throw in a top FA center to the mix and maybe we can have a good line?

I completely agree. We have enough talent under contract to build a good line if we just give it time for once. Since Snyder purchased the Redskins we have never given anything enough time to see if it would really work. Football is the ultimate team game. you can't build a Super Bowl team in one offseason. I would think we should know that by now...
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 07:49 AM   #15
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
bigstar - if we can get him to restructure Im completely with you, but that 11M salary will kill us!
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.71244 seconds with 10 queries