Close Only Counts In Horseshoes and Hand Grenades

[scowan]

Watch what the PAtriots will do in this next Draft, and how young and fast they will get. With Brady still there as their field general, they will be right back to 13-3 or 14-2 next year. It stinks!

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by scowan

Watch what the PAtriots will do in this next Draft, and how young and fast they will get. With Brady still there as their field general, they will be right back to 13-3 or 14-2 next year. It stinks!

Eh, F them. I hope they continue to come close to the SB but get bounced in the playoffs. Bellichik is a f'ing prick and I hope they never make it back to the SB. Hopefully the curse of Adam Vinitieri continues.

[skinster]

I skimmed through these posts and there seems to be quite a few people saying that Aaron Rodgers is a "system quarterback." IMO this couldn't be further from the truth. He is a winner. You can take your tom brady and peyton manning, I'll take Aaron Rodgers any day of the week. He is deadly accurate, has great vision, has a quick release, is tall enough to see over the line, makes quick reads and decision, and can sling it with zip just like those guys. The difference in my mind that makes Rodgers better than anyone in the league is his athleticism, confidence, fearlessness, and pocket awareness. Watch him in the pocket, he is absolutely amazing at evading the rush and getting the throw off no matter who is about to hit him. He is a playmaker and a winner. He is tom brady mixed with ben roethelssberger. I also love how he doesn't ream out his receivers when they drop half his passes. He lets them know he believes in them and throw right back at them.

[firstdown]

We could probably start 100's of what if threads with draft picks along with every other team. Looking back and saying what if is not very healthy in life.

[freddyg12]

I don't want to turn this into any more of a JC thread than it already is, just want to take up for Gibbs on this one. Would he have drafted Rodgers if he was still there? Who knows, but we do know that he liked JC. He drafted a qb that fit his system & was a high character kid. Did it turn out the way he envisioned? Of course not, but JC was avg. & Gibbs won a super bowl w/a guy that most would say was below avg. - Rypien.

If Gibbs & Saunders had stayed around a little longer, that draft would be easier to evaluate. Regardless, I give Gibbs credit for making the move at the time. It was something that needed to be done.

[freddyg12]

Originally Posted by scowan

Watch what the PAtriots will do in this next Draft, and how young and fast they will get. With Brady still there as their field general, they will be right back to 13-3 or 14-2 next year. It stinks!

I just hope they want to move up to #10.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon

In the 2005 draft, the Redskins were looking for a young QB early in Gibbs 2.0.

With the 9th pick in the draft, they took Carlos Rogers. That was better than taking Roy Rogers (who was clinically dead in 2005) but they missed on Aaron Rodgers who went at #24 in the draft.

What is interesting is that the Redskins scurried to trade up at that point to secure Jason Campbell as the #25 pick.

Homer Simpson says it best ...

is all I have to say about this sorry excuse for a thread.

We've gone down this road so many times...every season...and yet, it still ends with the same conclusion..."so what?"

Every team, even the 2010 Packers have these scenarios and unwarranted regrets.

I'm sure teams needing safeties have said "we were one pick away from Sean Taylor or LaRon Landry". Look at all of the teams probably regretting letting Orakpo go by on the draft board....who would have imagined he'd fall all the way to us at #13?

How is Andre Smith working out with the Bengals. Heyward-Bey? 25 teams passed on Clay Matthews. 21 teams let Percy Harvin go by them. Even Michael Oher is better than the 23rd pick he was taken with.

Every team has these scenarios in every draft.


Pointless thread is pointless.

[SouperMeister]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Given our track record in developing QBs and Vinny's terrible record in acquiring good players, none of this would have mattered.

If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times: Do not blame Vinny for the draft mis-steps of 2005, or for the terrible personnel moves of 2006 (Archuleta, Duckett, B. Lloyd, overpaying Randle El). Gibbs had the authority then that Shanny has now. Gibbs had the final stamp of approval on all personnel matters during his second run as HC. I recall his glowing report about Jason Campbell's character and physical skills. Had GB passed on Rodgers, there's no guarantee that Gibbs would have taken him over Campbell, especially given other personnel gaffes that occurred during that period.

[musicmaster45]

Yea JC wasnt any where near the answer but i appreciate Joe gibbs idea. Rodgers would have been cool but too late. Yea i hope they want our number one pick too. How old is Brady. I kinda want him to retire now lol

[skinster]

Originally Posted by freddyg12

I don't want to turn this into any more of a JC thread than it already is, just want to take up for Gibbs on this one. Would he have drafted Rodgers if he was still there? Who knows, but we do know that he liked JC. He drafted a qb that fit his system & was a high character kid. Did it turn out the way he envisioned? Of course not, but JC was avg. & Gibbs won a super bowl w/a guy that most would say was below avg. - Rypien.

If Gibbs & Saunders had stayed around a little longer, that draft would be easier to evaluate. Regardless, I give Gibbs credit for making the move at the time. It was something that needed to be done.

I'm pretty confident that Gibbs would have still drafted JC. I only knew him in his second stint, but it seems like Gibbs 2.0 very highly valued players who were religious. Campbell fits that bill, and I don't know about Rodgers, but I would guess no.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by skinster

I'm pretty confident that Gibbs would have still drafted JC. I only knew him in his second stint, but it seems like Gibbs 2.0 very highly valued players who were religious. Campbell fits that bill, and I don't know about Rodgers, but I would guess no.

I'm sure he appreciated their character but I HIGHLY doubt he based his draft board on their church attendance.

Sean Taylor had some issues early on, as did others. Gibbs was more of a mentor than a judge.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by SouperMeister

If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times: Do not blame Vinny for the draft mis-steps of 2005, or for the terrible personnel moves of 2006 (Archuleta, Duckett, B. Lloyd, overpaying Randle El). Gibbs had the authority then that Shanny has now. Gibbs had the final stamp of approval on all personnel matters during his second run as HC. I recall his glowing report about Jason Campbell's character and physical skills. Had GB passed on Rodgers, there's no guarantee that Gibbs would have taken him over Campbell, especially given other personnel gaffes that occurred during that period.

I meant Vinny in general (i.e. drafting 2 WRs and a TE in the 2nd round). I just feel that whether we had gotten Rodgers or not it would not have mattered because in general this team (apparently) doesn't know how to groom a young QB and made terrible personnel decisions in the seasons after that draft.

[sportscurmudgeon]

Originally Posted by firstdown

We could probably start 100's of what if threads with draft picks along with every other team. Looking back and saying what if is not very healthy in life.

Yes, but ... looking back is the only way to learn from past errors and not repeat them.

It is not healthy to swell on the past or to begin to think that "others are out to get you" based on your own mistakes, but looking at what you did in the past - - both right AND wrong - - is important. It is how you learn...

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon

Yes, but ... looking back is the only way to learn from past errors and not repeat them.

It is not healthy to swell on the past or to begin to think that "others are out to get you" based on your own mistakes, but looking at what you did in the past - - both right AND wrong - - is important. It is how you learn...

I think that, in general, that is an excellent philosophy of life.

However, Gibbs made the decision and he is not around to "learn." I'm not sure that your philosophy meets this situation from the past.

[skinster]

Originally Posted by Buster

I'm sure he appreciated their character but I HIGHLY doubt he based his draft board on their church attendance.

Sean Taylor had some issues early on, as did others. Gibbs was more of a mentor than a judge.

I'm not pulling this claim out of my ass. I don't have any sources, but I know I've heard him specifically make referances to Jason Campbell's faith.
Of course I'm not saying its the end all be all in Gibb's book, but listening to Gibbs speak over the years I do get a strong impression this factor is significant in picking his QB. I think he liked JC too much to draft anybody else.

Just because most people might not value faith as highly when choosing a quarterback, doesn't mean Gibbs doesn't.