![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Frederick,MD
Posts: 7
|
I guess if we did sign Taylor, I guess the secondary would be pretty good huh?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,765
|
Our saftey's are still pretty weak. Drafting Sean Taylor would help.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: the port, PA
Age: 40
Posts: 692
|
trying to clear room for bobby taylor is a huge mistake. he is old and will cost way to much. why not go after a mid-level corner instead and draft the real taylor we need. we have two good corners and an alright nickleback so why spend all this money on another corner with this high of a paycheck and us the money to help our d-line out
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 298
|
How much is he asking? He's good but I hope they don't overpay again.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 203
|
i think that samuels is gone unless he restructures anyway.i call it as i see it,he has played like complete $hit the last two years.
__________________
it's me,bigredskinfan63 bigledzepfan63 "the sea was red and the sky was grey,wondered how tommorow could ever follow today HAIL TO THE REDSKINS always remember ladies and germs-THE COWBOYS SUCK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Joe Bugel loves Samuels too much to let him go and if he is stubborn about it, there is no way Gibbs will let him go. Besides, I don't see us getting rid of a very good LT (those are almost as hard to come by as CBs).
I hate this move for the following reasons: 1. What about building our dline? 2. Taylor is a very good CB. True, but Taylor is getting long in the tooth and he is going to want more money than he is worth. Our secondary is in decent shape. Bauman is a solid zone coverage nickelback (he seems to have a pretty good nose for the ball) and though Springs and Smoot would make a good duo. 3. What about our dline? 4. Springs has a history of injuries and what if he goes down? True, but there is this thing called the salary cap and it doesn't like moves such as this. The fact is that Smoot's contract expires next season, we paid Springs a starter's salary with a starter's bonus, and you simply cannot afford to pay three corners starting salaries. We've already got Springs, we need to re-sign Smoot, and so I don't understand the desire to acquire Taylor. 5. What about our dline? 6. Well since we're already headed to cap hell, why not pile sh-t on top of sh-t by signing Taylor, thereby increasing our chances of winning the big one? That's about the only somewhat reasonable logic I can think of for this potential signing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 203
|
CMAN-you have an eye out for all of us do'nt you?
__________________
it's me,bigredskinfan63 bigledzepfan63 "the sea was red and the sky was grey,wondered how tommorow could ever follow today HAIL TO THE REDSKINS always remember ladies and germs-THE COWBOYS SUCK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10
|
"Bauman is a solid zone coverage nickelback (he seems to have a pretty good nose for the ball)"
I saw R. Bauman get burned plenty THROUGHOUT the season. He sucks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 1,501
|
Big 63, I love those Zeppelin quotes, man. I'm a huge Led Zeppelin fan myself. On the old Warpath, we had a thread going in the "Parking Lot" forum about the top 5 albums you would want to have with you if you got stuck on a deserted island. My top 5 were Zeppelin's first 5 albums. I reckon yours would have been the same?
Sorry to go off-topic. I just had to show my appreciation for a fellow Skins/Zeppelin fan. "This is the mystery of the quotient: upon us all a little rain must fall" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|