![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
Honestly, it would be the smartest thing any NFL prospect has ever done. Make sure your future is taken care of. Finish school, compete in the Olympics (which is a huge honor) and then see what the NFL has to offer. Sure, he can make big money in the NFL, but he can also get seriously hurt right away (not that I'd ever wish that on anybody) and never make it in the NFL. That makes me respect RG III that much more.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
Yeah the Texans getting rid of Schaub seems like a real stretch at this point.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
Yes, at this point, you are correct! And again, I did state, I see the Redskins drafting a QB more likely. BUT, what if, JUST WHAT IF, the Texans make it to the Super Bowl with Yates? WHAT IF, Yates breaks out during the playoffs and out plays ever other QB - at least on the AFC side. Would it be such a stretch then?
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
Definitely right now, it's a stretch considering New England would just out score the Texans, and the Ravens D would give Yates a headache - however, I'm sure the same was said about Tom Brady back in the day, so who knows? We'll find out.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
?? What's Schaub's contract status?
__________________
24-34 |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
WTF Griffin wants to go to law school before being an NFL star?! Really?!
__________________
24-34 |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,014
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
Quote:
__________________
Despite my solid 40 time and great intangibles I went undrafted AGAIN! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
The real question is.............
Should the skins......."Squeeze out a turd for Robert Griffin the third????"" |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
The hit to bust rate is about two-thirds hits to one third busts for the years 2002-2007 for first rounders that aren't also top ten picks. That's just a back of the napkin calculation that I did.
To recap: about 80% hits for top ten players about 65% hits for 11-32. I'm going to do a value analysis to see if the chances of getting a "big time" player in the top ten are much better than those odds.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 56
Posts: 3,803
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
Wasn't we linked to picking up Matt Flynn the back-up QB in gray bay, he's a FA at the end of the season.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
A couple things on a study I am doing.
Between 1997-2006, a top ten overall pick was about 38% more valuable than a pick between 11-32, and about 22% more valuable than a random pick within the first round. A top five pick is about 27% more valuable than a random pick in the first round. First overall picks come out as 55% more valuable, but that's more a sampling issue because my sample contains Peyton Manning. If you do the same thing but just from 1999-2006, first overall picks are only 14% more valuable than a random selection in the first round. Again, that's a sample size issue, which is why stat guys can't say "the first overall pick is with 'X'". In fact, it's been harder to find a good QB in the top five picks in the last seven drafts than it has been in the rest of the first round. Again, that's a sampling issue. And the Aaron Rodgers effect. The only metric I used was PFR's career AV. I did not take into account the value of the contract signed by draft position. Just the value of the players career to date. Obviously, this methodology underrates the value of players drafted in 2005 and 2006 vs. 1999 and 2000, but that's an evil I was willing to live with.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,114
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
According to a report on Profootballtalk.com, RG3's parents are already interviewing agents.
Report: Robert Griffin III’s parents interviewing agents | ProFootballTalk |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,022
|
Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III)
Quote:
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|