|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-26-2005, 08:57 PM
|
#16 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: IOWA
Age: 42
Posts: 1,324
|
Matt Jones from Arkansas could be a sleeper TE/WR/HB/FB/RB tweener that could become a special player in the right offense. Maybe ours?
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
01-26-2005, 09:16 PM
|
#17 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,264
|
Just like Cooley...
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
01-26-2005, 10:48 PM
|
#18 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,814
|
is it just me or do any of u all have the joy of a royal td ruined a little by his "special" dancing skillz? and I'm sure Gibbs and Bugel can find another young late round or undrafted te that could produce in a year or 2 in multiple ways.
|
|
|
|
|
01-26-2005, 10:59 PM
|
#19 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
|
Hey guys - Don't get too excited. He was a Spurrier pick in the draft!
I believe last year he made one or two really great catches. As far as size and blocking goes, he's below the average. I'd like to see us get another TE, even though I think Royal has a large upside, we need a larger, blocking TE. Double TE sets you could run Royal out as a receiver, or keep him at the line. I think that's where he'd be most dangerous. I'd like to see some films of how well he's able to release defenders and get up the seam. |
|
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 10:25 AM
|
#20 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 51
Posts: 72
|
Ok I might be wrong but don't we have 5 TE now? Royal and Cooley at the top. If both bulked up then we could have some serious playing going on there.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 10:28 AM
|
#21 |
|
\m/
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,831
|
I see people saying Royal needs to "bulk up", the guy goes 6'4 260 how much more weight should the guy put on?? If he puts on more weight he'll probably lose what decent speed he has.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 10:32 AM
|
#22 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 51
Posts: 72
|
The thing is. Is that he doesnt look 260 now does he? He looks more like 230
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 10:33 AM
|
#23 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 51
Posts: 72
|
But then I am blind.........lol
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 10:44 AM
|
#24 |
|
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,831
|
Well he is 6'4 so that's probably why he doesn't look 260
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 10:51 AM
|
#25 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 51
Posts: 72
|
My brother is 6'4 and he looks verymuch like he is 260 and he works out like a football player. he's huge.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 10:52 AM
|
#26 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
|
Cooley is an Hback - which means we normally have Hback and one TE in at the same time. We have to pull Cooley out for 2 TE sets, extra WRs etc
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 11:07 AM
|
#27 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 51
Posts: 72
|
I understand that but didnt he play in the TE spot. Isn't that what Biggs said what Cooley would do. Be versitile.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 11:36 AM
|
#28 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
|
Either way, I want a blocking TE, Cooley nor Royal fit that description.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 11:49 AM
|
#29 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,264
|
Who do you think would be the best blocking TE we could pick up? I haven't looked too much at the draft charts for TEs.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 11:51 AM
|
#30 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 51
Posts: 72
|
There isn't many TE comming out not good ones anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
