Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


How bad is our secondary?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-17-2012, 10:49 AM   #1
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
Re: How bad is our secondary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan View Post
Seriously, I'm asking those of you who look at film and analyze such things to clue in the rest of us: just how bad is our secondary?

I mean, we just made somebody named Danny Amendola look like Jerry Rice. For goodness sakes, he tied the all-time NFL record for receptions in one half against us! Danny Amendola!

What and/or who are the problems? Is it fixable with the current group of players? What do you think the Skins should do to make it better and save my sanity?
We all knew that this was an issue and it can't be fixed until the off season. Josh Wilson is really the only guy we have that can cover. If anyone can remember Amendola got over on us the last time we play them.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 10:49 AM   #2
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,178
Re: How bad is our secondary?

it's one of the worst in the league, Hall is really the only decent player we have. Wilson always gets beat
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 11:06 AM   #3
44 goes 50 gut
Registered User
 
44 goes 50 gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 79
Re: How bad is our secondary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
it's one of the worst in the league, Hall is really the only decent player we have. Wilson always gets beat
ohhhfff.... wheeew... Um... OH you're being sarcastic ... almost got me.
44 goes 50 gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 11:55 AM   #4
44 goes 50 gut
Registered User
 
44 goes 50 gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 79
Re: How bad is our secondary?

Okay lets look at this at a fundamental level. Since Shanny was hired he has addressed every aspect of the team in 3 years, yes, but secondary is easily the least "worked on" or improved area. When he came in he very obviously felt that Secondary and TE were the only areas that were RELATIVELY set at starter. He even talked publicly about this, placing the other areas of the team at a higher priority in the long term planning (to stop the bleeding so to speak at areas that were far worse off at the time).

So in three years:
QB: multiple moves, multiple top draft picks, trades: Much improved but at a huge price
WR: 3rd round and later picks, top free agent signings: Much improved but still a question mark and at a big Cap hit.
OL: Multiple top picks, trade, might have been hampered by Cap: Work in Progress but improved
DL/LBackers: Multiple top picks, good signings: Much improved but need a top inside LB very soon.
DB: very few picks none high. a lot of "patchwork" temporary fill ins, one good signing, one solid late round draft pick, a LOT of losses: most neglected area of the team.

Drilling down: a few late round picks made. They simply haven't HAD the picks to draft a high prospect DB without sacrificing other areas. Who do you sacrifice and who do you pick in their place? Price Amukamura (injury prone) instead of? Subtract one of Kerrigan, RGIII, J. Jenkins, Trent Williams, or subtract a lesser lower round pick and we don't necessarily get a starter?

Gomes seems like a keeper late draft picks, but they've lost talent at a higher rate than they can replace it. They lost Landry due to chronic injury (and self entitled character). Signed Atogwi, but he didn't work out due to injuries. Lost Carlos Rodgers, primarily because the guy couldn't catch a cold, until he suddenly decided to stop memorizing the eye chart OR he got caught doing it by San Fran, suddenly with improved eye sight, he's got fly paper hands. Still a low character guy, who felt entitled to be paid big by the Redskins despite probably dropping more game finishing interceptions than anyone in Skins history. So of course he talked down on his former team just like Landry, proving that we didn't want him anyway... Not interested in punks who blame everyone but themselves... especially when said punk clearly faked his eye exams or at the VERY LEAST didn't take his poor eye sight into account AFTER HE FOUND OUT ABOUT IT, and STILL talked crap about the Skins. Seriously I know there's still some people who liked Rodgers but when you say "there's still guys who want out of there" AFTER you found out your eye sight was bad when you played on that team? That's a b*tch move...

As far as moves they could have made, their were some, they could have resigned Rodgers, except he made it very obvious he didn't want to be here (after the fact see above). Nnamdi was available, not sure why he would have wanted to sign here as opposed to "the dream team"... Otherwise not a lot of Young free agents with upside, except Josh Wilson, who happily DID sign here, in what was undoubtedly an upgrade, as he's now our CB1, he should be a good CB2 though. Not your primary cover corner.

Conclusion: Three years isn't enough time or draft picks to address every area of the team. I conclude this because it's right there in black in white. Point out the starters they should have drafted and then pick who you subtract from the team to draft him.

They have had literally NO chance to use a high pick on a top DB without sacrificing an IMPACT player in other areas that were even less stocked with talent than the secondary was.



The previous administration left them with a big contract (Hall), two low character guys coming into their first free agency with talent but also with clear undeniable issues and zero depth.
44 goes 50 gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 06:37 PM   #5
takethecake
Special Teams
 
takethecake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 37
Posts: 281
Re: How bad is our secondary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44 goes 50 gut View Post
Conclusion: Three years isn't enough time or draft picks to address every area of the team. I conclude this because it's right there in black in white. Point out the starters they should have drafted and then pick who you subtract from the team to draft him.

They have had literally NO chance to use a high pick on a top DB without sacrificing an IMPACT player in other areas that were even less stocked with talent than the secondary was.



The previous administration left them with a big contract (Hall), two low character guys coming into their first free agency with talent but also with clear undeniable issues and zero depth.
Great post, I completely agree. Another thing to point out is that St Louis did their homework before this game. They knew that if they played a dropback passing game like Brees did last week their patchwork o-line would get destroyed by our pass rush, so they smartly based their offense around 3-step drops. Of course, the fact that we used a soft zone 10 yards off their receivers didn't help either, but basically, St Louis made our secondary look worse by gameplanning to nullify our defensive strengths and exploit our weaknesses.
takethecake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 12:22 PM   #6
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: How bad is our secondary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
it's one of the worst in the league, Hall is really the only decent player we have. Wilson always gets beat
OMG
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 09:04 PM   #7
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,098
Re: How bad is our secondary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
it's one of the worst in the league, Hall is really the only decent player we have. Wilson always gets beat
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 10:51 AM   #8
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: How bad is our secondary?

yeah Crawford played
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 10:52 AM   #9
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: How bad is our secondary?

How bad is the secondary?

Not as good as we thought after week 1, and probably not as bad as we are thinking right now.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 12:17 PM   #10
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: How bad is our secondary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
How bad is the secondary?

Not as good as we thought after week 1, and probably not as bad as we are thinking right now.
Agreed. If the scheme isn't right, can't always blame the players. I think Haslett stayed with the zone way too long. Plus, sometimes, a team just doesn't match up well with another team. I've seen that happen quite a few times, no matter how good or bad the team is usually.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 11:22 AM   #11
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
Re: How bad is our secondary?

Outside of Russell Wilson, who wouldn't play here, who is that magical third round pick who is contributing right now.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 11:48 AM   #12
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,022
Re: How bad is our secondary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
Outside of Russell Wilson, who wouldn't play here, who is that magical third round pick who is contributing right now.
No one here for sure and then you name a prime example and dismiss him lol. Most are getting playing time, ours is stretching out street cloths walking around looking like a hybrid Grimace and ChumLee. Glad your happy with our CB, Safety, and Tackle talent.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 11:34 AM   #13
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: How bad is our secondary?

Any word on Josh Wilson's injury? He got a concussion, no?
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 12:27 PM   #14
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
Re: How bad is our secondary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Any word on Josh Wilson's injury? He got a concussion, no?
Concussion, not yet cleared medically for Week 3.

Griffin would start in his place.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 12:15 PM   #15
Evilgrin
The Starter
 
Evilgrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 1,074
Re: How bad is our secondary?

Not as bad as the front 7 was yesterday....
Evilgrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.20263 seconds with 10 queries