Warren for Coles Even Up Trade?

[skin4Life28]

Wow White don't even know how to respond. Are you telling me Mike Williams is the only sure fire reciever in the draft. Haha, the man has zippy speed I mean we are talking 4.6 4.7 speed. My opinon can change if he shows me that he has worked out and has at least gotten to 4.5. I know he is tall and has tremendous ability, but I do not see him as a sure thing a WR. Don't be surprised due to his size and ability that he may be asked to put on about 15-20 pounds and try tight end. As for the other WR's they are all really solid espeically Mark Clayton. He may be the best all around reciever in this draft as far as stats and attributes go. If Minnesota takes Williams it would be a mistake they still have three very solid recievers with Kelly Campbell, Marcus Robinson, and Nate Burelson. They need defense really bad or a RB. I do not see them taking a wideout.

[Daseal]

A RB? They have Moe Williams, Onterrio Smith, Mewelde Moore, and Michael Bennett - they aren't going RB.

Troy Williamson isn't a bad receiver either. There's a lot of time between now and draft day!

What scares me is as a Redskin Mike Williams will actually get called when he pushes off - which he does constantly.

[Bozzy]

Does Warren have a last name or should I just call him Warren?

Which Warren...Sapp?

[SmootSmack]

Gerard Warren...though Warren Moon or Warren Harding would have been acceptable as well

[Bozzy]

Phew, for a second there I thought everybody meant Chris Warren. :/

[celts32]

No...draft pick for Coles. The Redskins need to go back to drafting players. The Redskins do not have a #2 this year i would rather see them add a #2 pick for Coles than some other teams over paid problems.

[ST21]

Ok Skinforlife28, I'm sure all the teams that passed up on Moss, the year he was drafted said the same thing, I mean you trying to tell me Mark Clayton is better than Mike Williams, and who remember the other WR drafted the Year Randy Moss was, yea that's what I thought, If Minnesota takes Williams and he has a break out year, then I'll see if your side GM ability worked, and If we go 6-10, because we think were NE, were not, Skinforlife or Scamforlife, why wouldn't Minnesota take Williams they can imporve in FA.....just don't respond unless you know facts, Clayton not even a Top 3 receivers in the draft, not even

[jrocx69]

Originally Posted by wewhite3

Ok Skinforlife28, I'm sure all the teams that passed up on Moss, the year he was drafted said the same thing, I mean you trying to tell me Mark Clayton is better than Mike Williams, and who remember the other WR drafted the Year Randy Moss was, yea that's what I thought, If Minnesota takes Williams and he has a break out year, then I'll see if your side GM ability worked, and If we go 6-10, because we think were NE, were not, Skinforlife or Scamforlife, why wouldn't Minnesota take Williams they can imporve in FA.....just don't respond unless you know facts, Clayton not even a Top 3 receivers in the draft, not even

:vomit-smi your post

and how do you know clayton wont dominate? ... moron, you dont know
do you remember coles being drafted in the third round, or maybe boldin selected 54th overall (late second round if you dont know) you dont know what the hell you are talking about. it could easily be chris henry from west virginia that dominates the rookie class wr's, and im willing to be he gets drafted in the 3rd round, maybe late second
wow you are a ....... :vomit-smi your post

[SmootSmack]

easy fellas

[CRT3]

Originally Posted by wewhite3

Ok Skinforlife28, I'm sure all the teams that passed up on Moss, the year he was drafted said the same thing, I mean you trying to tell me Mark Clayton is better than Mike Williams, and who remember the other WR drafted the Year Randy Moss was, yea that's what I thought, If Minnesota takes Williams and he has a break out year, then I'll see if your side GM ability worked, and If we go 6-10, because we think were NE, were not, Skinforlife or Scamforlife, why wouldn't Minnesota take Williams they can imporve in FA.....just don't respond unless you know facts, Clayton not even a Top 3 receivers in the draft, not even

Well the year that Randy got drafted was a weak WR draft. Only notables to come out were Dyson, Hines Ward, and Az Hakim. So the Vikings needed a WR and they got the best one on the board, no doubt. But to compare a player to Moss is absurd. Williams might not be the 2nd comming of any great recievers and Mark Clayton truly is not a bad pick. Question really here is character, for that alone we are lucky we do not have Randy Moss. Clayton is a top 3 WR. It goes Williams then Edwards or visa versa then Clayton. Who else is ahead of these 3 at WR, in anybodies profiles. Please let us see where you have found these facts. KNOW YOUR FACTS DUDE!!! And don't call people names as that is truly Moss-like.

[SmootSmack]

Warren is apparently going to Denver for a 4th round pick

[SKINSnCANES]

denver is royally messing up therir dline. Apparently they want to go to 3-4 becuase its cheaper to sign linebackers, and according to an article on espn Denver has never been able to keep a dline together for 100 years