![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
I've got no problem with that.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
Good luck enforcing that consistently.
When you lower your shoulder your head lowers at the same time unless you have a neck like Jim Carrey.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
You can lower your shoulder and still keep your head up and away from the contact as much as possible.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
There goes Alfred Morris' effectiveness...he runs everyone over.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
Do it. Players shouldn't lead WITH THE CROWN of their helmets on offense or defense. With the exception that if a ball carrier dives forward, he's fair game to helmet-to-helmet contact like today (no spearing/late hits/etc.). If he slides like a QB, he gets the same protection a QB does (maybe he does already).
And make "stiff arms" illegal too. In an era where defenders ability to tackle, or even interfere with a WR making a catch, are being nitpicked to death: RBs shouldn't have the right to facemask and punch defenders at will. edit: Tried to clarify what I meant about when the ball carrier dives forward. Last edited by HailGreen28; 03-15-2013 at 10:41 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
Maybe we should have Taylor Swift play all the safety and linebacker positions and she could proclaim that you wil never ever ever hit me with your helmet.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
Jeff Fisher seems to think it is reasonable:
“The ballcarrier is still going to be permitted to lower his shoulder, and the head is also going to come down to protect the football,” Fisher said. “We’re not taking that part of the run out of the game. What we’re saying is, in space, one-on-one, head-up, we’re not going to allow you to load up and use the crown of your helmet. It’s an obvious thing.” |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
The people on the competition committee, including that idiot John Mara, are all for this rule. It's utterly ridiculous. It has some legs to it and I think it has a chance of passing. 24/32 owners have to approve it and they want to eliminate all the concussions out of a violent sport. It's just so stupid.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 1,074
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
What happens if they flag it on a goal line run? I know what the intent is, but refs still would be determining what they consider to be space?
__________________
Bruce Allen “We’re winning off the field,” Redskins #2 In Revenue Per Year! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
So if a RB is out in the open, and he's going for the sideline and he wants to lower his head to get a few extra yards, or get a first down, he can't do it, and will get a PF. That's just not football to me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
No he can't turn himself into a missile and use his helmet as a battering ram. He may use his shoulder or torso or whatever...just not his helmet....just like defenders can't either. Never made sense to me that defenders would get flagged repeatedly for it when ball-carriers didn't.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|