Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2013, 11:22 AM   #1
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
The rule proposed to ban leading with the crown of the helmet. Not banning the lowering of the shoulder
I've got no problem with that.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 11:26 AM   #2
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I've got no problem with that.
Good luck enforcing that consistently.
When you lower your shoulder your head lowers at the same time unless you have a neck like Jim Carrey.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 12:21 PM   #3
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
Good luck enforcing that consistently.
When you lower your shoulder your head lowers at the same time unless you have a neck like Jim Carrey.
You can lower your shoulder and still keep your head up and away from the contact as much as possible.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 12:32 PM   #4
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
The rule proposed to ban leading with the crown of the helmet. Not banning the lowering of the shoulder
But how do you lower your shoulder w/out lowering your head?? ... going at full speed with a 250lbs LB trying to tackle you?
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 11:21 AM   #5
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

There goes Alfred Morris' effectiveness...he runs everyone over.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 10:33 PM   #6
HailGreen28
Playmaker
 
HailGreen28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

Do it. Players shouldn't lead WITH THE CROWN of their helmets on offense or defense. With the exception that if a ball carrier dives forward, he's fair game to helmet-to-helmet contact like today (no spearing/late hits/etc.). If he slides like a QB, he gets the same protection a QB does (maybe he does already).

And make "stiff arms" illegal too. In an era where defenders ability to tackle, or even interfere with a WR making a catch, are being nitpicked to death: RBs shouldn't have the right to facemask and punch defenders at will.

edit: Tried to clarify what I meant about when the ball carrier dives forward.

Last edited by HailGreen28; 03-15-2013 at 10:41 PM.
HailGreen28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 11:23 AM   #7
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

Maybe we should have Taylor Swift play all the safety and linebacker positions and she could proclaim that you wil never ever ever hit me with your helmet.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 11:54 AM   #8
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

Jeff Fisher seems to think it is reasonable:

“The ballcarrier is still going to be permitted to lower his shoulder, and the head is also going to come down to protect the football,” Fisher said. “We’re not taking that part of the run out of the game. What we’re saying is, in space, one-on-one, head-up, we’re not going to allow you to load up and use the crown of your helmet. It’s an obvious thing.”
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 12:32 PM   #9
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
Jeff Fisher seems to think it is reasonable:

“The ballcarrier is still going to be permitted to lower his shoulder, and the head is also going to come down to protect the football,” Fisher said. “We’re not taking that part of the run out of the game. What we’re saying is, in space, one-on-one, head-up, we’re not going to allow you to load up and use the crown of your helmet. It’s an obvious thing.”
When it's explained like that it makes sense. They're not taking out lowering of the shoulder. Just can't use the helmet.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 12:27 PM   #10
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

The people on the competition committee, including that idiot John Mara, are all for this rule. It's utterly ridiculous. It has some legs to it and I think it has a chance of passing. 24/32 owners have to approve it and they want to eliminate all the concussions out of a violent sport. It's just so stupid.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 12:36 PM   #11
Evilgrin
The Starter
 
Evilgrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 1,074
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

What happens if they flag it on a goal line run? I know what the intent is, but refs still would be determining what they consider to be space?
__________________
Bruce Allen “We’re winning off the field,”

Redskins #2 In Revenue Per Year!
Evilgrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 01:41 PM   #12
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilgrin View Post
What happens if they flag it on a goal line run? I know what the intent is, but refs still would be determining what they consider to be space?
Doesn't apply in the tackle box.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 12:36 PM   #13
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

So if a RB is out in the open, and he's going for the sideline and he wants to lower his head to get a few extra yards, or get a first down, he can't do it, and will get a PF. That's just not football to me.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 01:43 PM   #14
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
So if a RB is out in the open, and he's going for the sideline and he wants to lower his head to get a few extra yards, or get a first down, he can't do it, and will get a PF. That's just not football to me.
No he can't turn himself into a missile and use his helmet as a battering ram. He may use his shoulder or torso or whatever...just not his helmet....just like defenders can't either. Never made sense to me that defenders would get flagged repeatedly for it when ball-carriers didn't.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 02:06 PM   #15
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
Re: New helmet conatct rule/proposal...I agree with Emmit Smith.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
No he can't turn himself into a missile and use his helmet as a battering ram. He may use his shoulder or torso or whatever...just not his helmet....just like defenders can't either. Never made sense to me that defenders would get flagged repeatedly for it when ball-carriers didn't.
Again, you can't do that w/out lowering your head.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.08425 seconds with 10 queries