Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

aehs77 · 03-10-2005, 06:19 PM

i hate too say it but i see ramsey getting hurt early and hassellbeck having a hell of a year.

Riggo44 · 03-10-2005, 09:08 PM

I think Ramsey is going to have a great year in 2005. With Jansen back and a year under his belt with Gibbs Ramsey should be primed and ready to go.

jermus22 · 03-10-2005, 09:24 PM

Ramsey does NOT need to complete 60% in a Gibbs offense. In '87, the year we won with Doug Williams, he only completed somewhere around 56%, and in '91, Mark Rypien hit 59%, made the Pro Bowl, and got Super Bowl MVP. I know it's a new era of football with new expectations, but I don't think a guy needs to hit 60% to do well. We just need to hit the necessary throws on third down and get the deep ball when opponents stack for the run.

MTK · 03-11-2005, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aehs77

i hate too say it but i see ramsey getting hurt early and hassellbeck having a hell of a year.

where did you get your crystal ball? I'd like one too.

steveo395 · 03-10-2005, 06:41 PM

hasselbeck doesnt suck he's just too inconsistent

BrudLee · 03-11-2005, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveo395

hasselbeck doesnt suck he's just too inconsistent

He's very consistent. That clipboard stays at a 35 degree angle the whole game.

BOO-YAH!

Sammy Baugh Fan · 03-11-2005, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrudLee

He's very consistent. That clipboard stays at a 35 degree angle the whole game.

BOO-YAH!

I agree. We got the EVIL Twin when it came to those two brothers.

peace

BrudLee · 03-11-2005, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sammy Baugh Fan

I agree. We got the EVIL Twin when it came to those two brothers.

peace

I bet he knows how to keep his mouth shut at a coin flip, though.

Big C · 03-10-2005, 07:34 PM

passing for 2200 yards is very, very, very few for a starter...id say around 3k if he plays all the games

Schneed10 · 03-10-2005, 08:17 PM

2800 yards, 19 TDs, 17 INTs, 59% completion, 80 QB Rating.

I think he's a sturdy kid and can make it all 16 games, but the fact of the matter is hardly any QBs in the league play in every single game. I'll figure he plays 14 games and puts up 2800 yards, which works out to 200 per game. Gibbs' offense is still conservative, but 200 a game will be a slight step up from Ramsey's pace last year, which is reflective of the speedy receivers and going deep a bit more often.

On the TDs, I see him stepping it up a bit to 19 TDs in 14 games. I think he found a rapport with Cooley in the red zone at the end of last year which will continue, and I think Santana Moss will add some homerun capability that Coles didn't provide with his bum toe.

On the completion percentage, last year he was at 62%. I think if they're going to go deep a bit more, the completion % drops a bit to 59%.

Interceptions, last year he had 11 INTs. But remember, 3 of those were in that game where he came in and tried to dig the Redskins out of a hole when Brunell got hurt. I think it was against the Giants? In his 7 starts he had 8 INTs. So this season I say that trend continues, 17 INTs in 14 games.

Last season his QB rating was 74, with that horrible Giants game dragging it down. In his starts, it was better, I think around 80 or so. I'll go with that 80 figure, but if he can hit on some homerun passes to Moss & Patten, and still manage to keep the INTs down, I could see him getting up to a 90 rating.

I don't see him making the pro bowl, but if he can play like I describe above, and Portis has a good year, I think that's good enough to go to the playoffs.

e16bball · 03-10-2005, 08:33 PM

I really don't think the original projections by wewhite are too far off what I am expecting. A passer rating of 85.0 would have been basically middle of the road in the NFL and not unlike what he posted in his starts last year. 24 TDs is a fair amount, especially in a run-based offense, but its possible. 9 INTS is kind of few, but also possible. I think something like 21 TDs and 12 INTs is very reasonable. 3000 yards is also easily attainable if he plays all 16 games.

e16bball · 03-10-2005, 08:36 PM

Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that he should complete at least 60% of his passes in this offense.

heybigstar · 03-10-2005, 08:44 PM

I see the Skins surprising everybody behind the underrated wr corp, ST and the nasty D, and Ramsey the gun slinger...

SmootSmack · 03-10-2005, 09:02 PM

heybigstar, might be time to change that sig

TheMalcolmConnection · 03-10-2005, 09:24 PM

Most definitely. A lot of people are waaay too pessimistic. We HAVE seen signs of greatness out of Ramsey. I definitely think he has it in him and with an upgraded line and WR corps, I think this might be his breakout year.

03-10-2005, 06:19 PM	#1
aehs77 Special Teams Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: silver spring Age: 40 Posts: 486	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! i hate too say it but i see ramsey getting hurt early and hassellbeck having a hell of a year.

03-10-2005, 09:08 PM	#2
Riggo44 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: San Clemente CA Age: 51 Posts: 2,390	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! I think Ramsey is going to have a great year in 2005. With Jansen back and a year under his belt with Gibbs Ramsey should be primed and ready to go. __________________ Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. Benjamin Franklin

03-10-2005, 09:24 PM	#3
jermus22 Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Frankfort, KY Age: 43 Posts: 336	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! Ramsey does NOT need to complete 60% in a Gibbs offense. In '87, the year we won with Doug Williams, he only completed somewhere around 56%, and in '91, Mark Rypien hit 59%, made the Pro Bowl, and got Super Bowl MVP. I know it's a new era of football with new expectations, but I don't think a guy needs to hit 60% to do well. We just need to hit the necessary throws on third down and get the deep ball when opponents stack for the run. __________________ Win it in the trenches.

03-10-2005, 06:41 PM	#5
steveo395 The Starter Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: New Jersey Posts: 1,674	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! hasselbeck doesnt suck he's just too inconsistent

03-10-2005, 07:34 PM	#9
Big C Mr. Brightside Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 39 Posts: 4,453	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! passing for 2200 yards is very, very, very few for a starter...id say around 3k if he plays all the games __________________ "I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs

03-10-2005, 08:17 PM	#10
Schneed10 A Dude Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 46 Posts: 12,458	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! 2800 yards, 19 TDs, 17 INTs, 59% completion, 80 QB Rating. I think he's a sturdy kid and can make it all 16 games, but the fact of the matter is hardly any QBs in the league play in every single game. I'll figure he plays 14 games and puts up 2800 yards, which works out to 200 per game. Gibbs' offense is still conservative, but 200 a game will be a slight step up from Ramsey's pace last year, which is reflective of the speedy receivers and going deep a bit more often. On the TDs, I see him stepping it up a bit to 19 TDs in 14 games. I think he found a rapport with Cooley in the red zone at the end of last year which will continue, and I think Santana Moss will add some homerun capability that Coles didn't provide with his bum toe. On the completion percentage, last year he was at 62%. I think if they're going to go deep a bit more, the completion % drops a bit to 59%. Interceptions, last year he had 11 INTs. But remember, 3 of those were in that game where he came in and tried to dig the Redskins out of a hole when Brunell got hurt. I think it was against the Giants? In his 7 starts he had 8 INTs. So this season I say that trend continues, 17 INTs in 14 games. Last season his QB rating was 74, with that horrible Giants game dragging it down. In his starts, it was better, I think around 80 or so. I'll go with that 80 figure, but if he can hit on some homerun passes to Moss & Patten, and still manage to keep the INTs down, I could see him getting up to a 90 rating. I don't see him making the pro bowl, but if he can play like I describe above, and Portis has a good year, I think that's good enough to go to the playoffs.

03-10-2005, 08:33 PM	#11
e16bball Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 163	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! I really don't think the original projections by wewhite are too far off what I am expecting. A passer rating of 85.0 would have been basically middle of the road in the NFL and not unlike what he posted in his starts last year. 24 TDs is a fair amount, especially in a run-based offense, but its possible. 9 INTS is kind of few, but also possible. I think something like 21 TDs and 12 INTs is very reasonable. 3000 yards is also easily attainable if he plays all 16 games.

03-10-2005, 08:36 PM	#12
e16bball Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 163	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that he should complete at least 60% of his passes in this offense.

03-10-2005, 08:44 PM	#13
heybigstar Special Teams Join Date: Oct 2004 Age: 41 Posts: 375	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! I see the Skins surprising everybody behind the underrated wr corp, ST and the nasty D, and Ramsey the gun slinger... __________________ Hail to the Redskins.

03-10-2005, 09:02 PM	#14
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! heybigstar, might be time to change that sig __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

03-10-2005, 09:24 PM	#15
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,264	Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!! Most definitely. A lot of people are waaay too pessimistic. We HAVE seen signs of greatness out of Ramsey. I definitely think he has it in him and with an upgraded line and WR corps, I think this might be his breakout year. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

Locker Room Main Forum