![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 | |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
Quote:
Spurrier would have used him a lot more had it not been for freak injuries and I know a lot of people on this board have been high on Jacobs for a long time. Not to mention, I feel it takes 4 years till you can call someone a bust.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#17 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
I think everyone or most everyone here on this board can agree that we're all behind Taylor Jacobs 100%! I know there are many if's concerning our receivers right now, but IF Jacobs can prove this year that he was steal in the second round, and Moss stays healthy this year, I think our receiver corp will be okay.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Connecticut
Age: 54
Posts: 312
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
Quote:
I hear ya... I was thinking the TE was only going to be inserted on these plays as an addl blocker or decoy. With 3 WR's you get to stretch the D in depth, but with Portis in the backfield you have to keep the LB's honest. Gibbs will need to experiment a bit with his formations this season if he's going to produce better offensive numbers. Last season the offense was too simplified & the defenses picked up it really quick & shut it down.
__________________
Throwing on 4th and inches..! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,577
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
that is true. moss will be #1, jacobs #2, and patten #3.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 293
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
Jacobs was Spurriers boy. It's not like he has been injured constantly the past 2 years...Spurrier just wanted him riding the bench for a while.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 59
Posts: 1,176
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
You're right. Lost my head there. I was in "NFL Blitz mode".
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Maryland
Age: 55
Posts: 187
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
5 WR + 1 RT + 1 RG + 1 C + 1 LG + 1 LT + 1 QB + Cooley = 12 men on the field penalty.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Age: 44
Posts: 461
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
i think we picked up TE kashetta from B.C. and is a gibbs type player as far as work ethic is concerned...and he has yet to be released as a UFA. he is a good short area receiver and a much better blocker than royal. royal is just more fluid. i think that would be a nice one two punch and hopefully kashetta makes the team. back to the main purpose of the thread... i like taylor alot and even though alot of florida wr's are usually a bust, (ike hilliard, willie jackson, ridell anthony) just to name a few. taylor is a good size and does have speed/agility to make it. i think he will fit in nicely as a #2 and hopefully work his way up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 375
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
Quote:
__________________
Hail to the Redskins. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
Quote:
i think you guys are under estimating the ability of patten. remember patten was the first wr we picked up when free agency started and he was the second pick up following only casey rabach. i've said it before and i'll say it again "don't be surprised if patten leads the skins in receptions this year". he is a very good wr, he practices hard, studies film and is a veteran of the game. he's fast, he's quick and he has good hands. out of the three guys listed obove i would say patten is the best with moss second and jacobs third. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
I'm rooting for the guy as much as anyone, but don't you think that by now, he'd have made some sort of statement, something to make the coaches say "WOW" and breaks into the starting lineup?
I know, I know. Injuries. But come on. Injuries supposedly weren't a problem last year and he couldn't unseat Rod Gardner. There's got to be some sort of performance that leaves absolutely no doubt in the coaches mind that he needs to play now. Have we seen that? I don't think so. But I'll jump on his bandwagon anyway. This is his last chance, and we'd better see something that really stands out -- and fast. The first preseason game, I'll be watching closely for him to do his stuff and make everybody wonder why he hasn't played more. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,765
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
Quote:
Include me in the group of, 'I would like to see Jacobs play well and have a breakout year'. I do not question his speed, hands or ability to run patterns. I do question his toughness. He came out of college with whispers about his possible lack of toughness. I am a little negatively biased about Jacobs toughness, because the only game I saw Jacobs play in college (I forget the opponent), Jacobs took a good hit to his back from the DB while trying to catch a pass. He went down and had to helped off the field. Jacobs did not return until a good quarter or more. When Jacobs finally did return to the game he played scared and was a non-factor in the rest of that game. So to see him as Redskin be a non-factor, injury prone player, it is all I have seen from him. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 155
|
Re: Taylor Jacobs
How is Jacob's blocking? Maybe that is/was an issue. Somebody mentioned he couldn't out-seat Gardner. Maybe it's because Gardner was a better blocker. Everyone can see that Joe Gibbs goes silly with the blocking. Maybe he'll open it up though. His max protect scheme didn't pan out. He'll adjust.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|