Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

Schneed10 · 09-01-2005, 04:32 PM

Again, here is the problem without looking in-depth at a team.

I'm still saying 10-6.

firstdown · 09-01-2005, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D'BOYZ

GOD this article of Dr. Z is really affecting you it's really funny 2 week ago when the NFC East prediction post was in this site all of you put the Redskins no worse then a 9-7 record some of you said they will win the division.

Now 2 weeks later Dr. Z says your team will go 4-12 and you start saying well I know we ain't that good but we ain't that bad some say that a 6-10 prediction was more accurate and the most opptimistic of you said 8-8 COULD be reach if all things fall into the pieces.

Come on what happen in the last 2 week you finally accepted your team it aint that good I agree it ain't that bad a gave them a 8-8 prediction my self putting the little giants at the bottom of the conference, but after some reporters across the league star bashing your team and saying they ain't good you bow your head and say we aint really good but we also ain't that bad.......

It's good that your finally seeing things more clearly its sad that it took this to looked in a more realistic now I Don't agree with Dr.Z with the 4-12 prediction that's to low you have a good runne good line and good D that will at least win you 6 games and 2 maybe 3 you can win by smaller margins I think an 8-8 its more realistic and it could go to 9-7 or 7-9.

So whats your prediction for Dallas? I still think the skins will win 9 to 10 games this year.

Schneed10 · 09-01-2005, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D'BOYZ

GOD this article of Dr. Z is really affecting you, it's really funny 2 week ago when the NFC East prediction post was in this site all of you put the Redskins no worse then a 9-7 record some of you said they will win the division.

Now 2 weeks later Dr. Z says your team will go 4-12 and you start saying "well I know we ain't that good but, we ain't that bad". Some say that a 6-10 prediction was more accurate and the most opptimistic of you said 8-8 COULD be reached if all things fall into the pieces.

Come on what happen in the last 2 week you finally accepted your team it ain't that good I agree it ain't that bad a gave them a 8-8 prediction myself putting the little giants at the bottom of the conference, but after some reporters across the league star bashing your team and saying they ain't good you bow your head and say we aint really good but we also ain't that bad.......

It's good that you're finally seeing things more clearly, its sad that it took this for you to aproach this in a more realistic way. Now I don't agree with Dr.Z with the 4-12 prediction that's to low, you have a good RB good OL and good D that will at least win you 6 games and 2 maybe 3 more. I think an 8-8 its more realistic and it could go to 9-7 or 7-9.

Seriously dude, you need to learn to use some punctuation. You've got run-on sentence after run-on sentence. I can't understand what you're trying to say.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 09-01-2005, 04:35 PM

Dr. Z is not as hellbent on trashing the Skins as that fat ass Jabba the Hut turd (aka Lenny Pastabelly, aka fat ass, aka bad comb-over). But, Dr. Z is nonetheless a moron. We're pretty much wasting out time evaluating the prognostications that these so-called experts churn out each preseason. Most experts and analysts know little more than me or any other football fan.

I personally think we're probably going to end up 9-7. Many of the teams that we are facing this season are really good on offense, but really bad on defense. Our defense should be able to handle opposing offenses, while our offense should be good enough to win games. The Cowboys and Giants offenses looks terrible; so I think we should be able to squeeze 2-3 wins out of them and possibly one win from the Eagles.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 09-01-2005, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Seriously dude, you need to learn to use some punctuation. You've got run-on sentence after run-on sentence. I can't understand what you're trying to say.

We probably should not expect too much from a Cowboys fan. Most of them are either in the clink or have yet to pass their 6th grade English tests.

wilsowilso · 09-01-2005, 04:37 PM

I wonder if any of this ever actually reaches Joe Gibbs eyes or ears? As I said before after the rankings and now that this without a doubt proves it. Dr. Z has officially come out and said Gibbs doesn't know what he is doing. Talk about a lack of respect. It's kind of sad really.

My name is Dr. Z. I like wine and cheese. I have no respect for the history of football. Somebody stop me geez. If you need to wipe your @#$. Read my articles please.

mredskins · 09-01-2005, 04:40 PM

dr z seriously is always wrong!

D'BOYZ · 09-01-2005, 04:46 PM

My prediction for Dallas was and still is 10-6 second on the division Wild Card spot based on our schedule, our draft, our free agents signings and that we have a much better team than 2 years ago when we went 10 -6.

Now about the grammar man I'm not writing in my mother language I'm doing my best to express myself and my point of view to you

Gmanc711 · 09-01-2005, 05:16 PM

Seriously, Ramsey has had a worse preseason than Brunell, but has coach Gibbs given any indication that ANYONE besides Patrick Ramsey would be the guy for this team??

saden1 · 09-01-2005, 05:17 PM

Bad Defense??? I am truly laughing my ass off!!!!

Beemnseven · 09-01-2005, 05:26 PM

Gentlemen, we can get as pissed off as we want about these types of predictions, but until this team shapes up and starts performing the way all of us think they can, we can look forward to more of this.

Since 2002, this franchise has generated records of 7-9, 5-11, and 6-10. That’s the mark of a bad football team no matter how you slice it. Honestly, what has happened that would make any outsider believe that this is a playoff team on the verge of a breakout season? As fans, the only thing we have to cling to is hope. The same way we would look at the Cleveland Browns, the San Fransisco 49ers, or the Houston Texans – some other knowledgeable observer of the NFL could look at us and sum up the same type of expectations. The only way to change that is to start winning. But every year, we seem to find ourselves uttering the same familiar words: “Maybe next year.”

Either this team is full of great players who manage to underachieve season after season, or they’re just plain bad, and not even Joe Gibbs can do anything to change it.

This may infuriate a lot of us, but then, the truth usually does.

wolfeskins · 09-01-2005, 05:27 PM

the skins will win the east this year and they'll do it in grand fashion, they will sweep the giants, dallas and the eagles.

no i'm not joking around. the skins will surprise alot of people this year. the defense will be better than last year's and the offense will finish in the top 12.

the cowriods will be the worst team in the east. their defense will struggle worse than many think and their offense will end the year ranked no better than 25th.

MTK · 09-01-2005, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

I don't get how Dr. Z thinks we'll actually be worse this year, but whatever. He isn't nearly the tool this guy below is, whoever he is.

"Washington Redskins (5-11) – Team in personnel flux, QBs Ramsey and Brunell sub-par, bad defense."

bad defense???

Ok I think we have a winner for the most jackassed prediction

BleedBurgundy · 09-01-2005, 05:43 PM

Sometimes, I feel like the Randy Quaid (sp?) character in Major League I and II... I convince myself we're going all the way, and then after week 3, I start drinking heavily and cursing at Ramsey...

BigSKINBauer · 09-01-2005, 05:53 PM

Not that i like defending cowroids but..
we might have been allittle to harsh on the dalASS fan, (d'boyz). My grammer on this sight is pretty darn bad too. But all he said is that we were happy last week and not to get let down by this stupid article and he believes that we may 9-7.

We shouldn't care about the stupid article, it means nothing, that old fart doesn't know what he is talking about. 4 wins is just plain old bad. Most of us are not caring about this article at all. I surprisingly am not even the slighest bit ticked(usually i am). Lets take it for what it is........ and that is a stupid article by an even stupider man

09-01-2005, 04:32 PM	#16
Schneed10 A Dude Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 46 Posts: 12,458	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) Again, here is the problem without looking in-depth at a team. I'm still saying 10-6.

09-01-2005, 04:35 PM	#19
Sheriff Gonna Getcha Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 46 Posts: 8,317	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) Dr. Z is not as hellbent on trashing the Skins as that fat ass Jabba the Hut turd (aka Lenny Pastabelly, aka fat ass, aka bad comb-over). But, Dr. Z is nonetheless a moron. We're pretty much wasting out time evaluating the prognostications that these so-called experts churn out each preseason. Most experts and analysts know little more than me or any other football fan. I personally think we're probably going to end up 9-7. Many of the teams that we are facing this season are really good on offense, but really bad on defense. Our defense should be able to handle opposing offenses, while our offense should be good enough to win games. The Cowboys and Giants offenses looks terrible; so I think we should be able to squeeze 2-3 wins out of them and possibly one win from the Eagles.

09-01-2005, 04:37 PM	#21
wilsowilso Registered User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Los Angeles Age: 52 Posts: 2,841	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) I wonder if any of this ever actually reaches Joe Gibbs eyes or ears? As I said before after the rankings and now that this without a doubt proves it. Dr. Z has officially come out and said Gibbs doesn't know what he is doing. Talk about a lack of respect. It's kind of sad really. My name is Dr. Z. I like wine and cheese. I have no respect for the history of football. Somebody stop me geez. If you need to wipe your @#$. Read my articles please. Last edited by wilsowilso; 09-01-2005 at 04:44 PM. Reason: change one word

09-01-2005, 04:46 PM	#23
D'BOYZ The Starter Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 1,363	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) My prediction for Dallas was and still is 10-6 second on the division Wild Card spot based on our schedule, our draft, our free agents signings and that we have a much better team than 2 years ago when we went 10 -6. Now about the grammar man I'm not writing in my mother language I'm doing my best to express myself and my point of view to you

09-01-2005, 05:16 PM	#24
Gmanc711 Thank You, Sean. Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 39 Posts: 7,506	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) Seriously, Ramsey has had a worse preseason than Brunell, but has coach Gibbs given any indication that ANYONE besides Patrick Ramsey would be the guy for this team?? __________________ #21

09-01-2005, 04:40 PM	#22
mredskins Gamebreaker Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 13,007	dr z seriously is always wrong!

09-01-2005, 05:17 PM	#25
saden1 MVP Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 46 Posts: 10,069	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) Bad Defense??? I am truly laughing my ass off!!!!

09-01-2005, 05:26 PM	#26
Beemnseven Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 51 Posts: 5,311	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) Gentlemen, we can get as pissed off as we want about these types of predictions, but until this team shapes up and starts performing the way all of us think they can, we can look forward to more of this. Since 2002, this franchise has generated records of 7-9, 5-11, and 6-10. That’s the mark of a bad football team no matter how you slice it. Honestly, what has happened that would make any outsider believe that this is a playoff team on the verge of a breakout season? As fans, the only thing we have to cling to is hope. The same way we would look at the Cleveland Browns, the San Fransisco 49ers, or the Houston Texans – some other knowledgeable observer of the NFL could look at us and sum up the same type of expectations. The only way to change that is to start winning. But every year, we seem to find ourselves uttering the same familiar words: “Maybe next year.” Either this team is full of great players who manage to underachieve season after season, or they’re just plain bad, and not even Joe Gibbs can do anything to change it. This may infuriate a lot of us, but then, the truth usually does.

09-01-2005, 05:27 PM	#27
wolfeskins The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: chesapeake,va. Posts: 2,160	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) the skins will win the east this year and they'll do it in grand fashion, they will sweep the giants, dallas and the eagles. no i'm not joking around. the skins will surprise alot of people this year. the defense will be better than last year's and the offense will finish in the top 12. the cowriods will be the worst team in the east. their defense will struggle worse than many think and their offense will end the year ranked no better than 25th. __________________ Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38)

09-01-2005, 05:43 PM	#29
BleedBurgundy Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 4,471	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) Sometimes, I feel like the Randy Quaid (sp?) character in Major League I and II... I convince myself we're going all the way, and then after week 3, I start drinking heavily and cursing at Ramsey...

09-01-2005, 05:53 PM	#30
BigSKINBauer Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Washington, DC Age: 37 Posts: 5,688	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) Not that i like defending cowroids but.. we might have been allittle to harsh on the dalASS fan, (d'boyz). My grammer on this sight is pretty darn bad too. But all he said is that we were happy last week and not to get let down by this stupid article and he believes that we may 9-7. We shouldn't care about the stupid article, it means nothing, that old fart doesn't know what he is talking about. 4 wins is just plain old bad. Most of us are not caring about this article at all. I surprisingly am not even the slighest bit ticked(usually i am). Lets take it for what it is........ and that is a stupid article by an even stupider man

Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

Locker Room Main Forum