Question 3 (I asked Gibbs a question)

[dmek25]

thers no way the question wants to be involved in any fistacuffs.has much more to offer than that.

[JoeRedskin]

If only one fisticuff is involved - is it still Question 3?

[onlydarksets]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

If only one fisticuff is involved - is it still Question 3?

If you are alone in the woods and you ask Question 3 but nobody is around to hear you ask it, was Question 3 really asked?

[TheMalcolmConnection]

I think the answer is that Michael Vick is overrated.

[Gmanc711]

Originally Posted by ST21

New Yorkers.........so tuff

Maybe your shitty additude is the awnser to question 3, jackass.

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by onlydarksets

If you are alone in the woods and you ask Question 3 but nobody is around to hear you ask it, was Question 3 really asked?

I'm sorry, but please keep current on your Question 3 lore. This was already discussed in Posts 150-153. The answer was "yes" and "Malcolm".

[TheMalcolmConnection]

I am humbled.

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by ST21

New Yorkers.........so tuff

Originally Posted by Gmanc711

Maybe your shitty additude is the awnser to question 3, jackass.

Whooaaa. Let's keep the hate out of Question 3.

Take it to Question 2, that way it will be resolved and you can move on to the deeper thought of Question 3.

[onlydarksets]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

I'm sorry, but please keep current on your Question 3 lore. This was already discussed in Posts 150-153. The answer was "yes" and "Malcolm".

Nice try, but it was a different question. I challenged whether Question 3 was even ASKED - not whether it was ANSWERED. I know what you are thinking - how can a question be answered if it isn't asked? Therein lies the mystery of Question 3. You have much to learn...

[cpayne5]

You must not censor thoughts, Joe. True philosophical thought will never be realized, if you do.

[Gmanc711]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Whooaaa. Let's keep the hate out of Question 3.

Take it to Question 2, that way it will be resolved and you can move on to the deeper thought of Question 3.

Joe, I think the tension may help us get to the bottom of question 3.

[dmek25]

thats the point,only a select few know the answer to this question(one of them being T.O.)another being the dali llama

[BigSKINBauer]

ahhhh, this thread is jumping with a lot of posts..... it must be the offseason.

We can try and try but we will not know the true meaning until Gibbs raises a big shiney silver football over his head sometime in february next year.

i think sometime over this offseason we must cronical everything we have learned and try to dwell deeper into the mistery.

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by cpayne5

You must not censor thoughts, Joe. True philosophical thought will never be realized, if you do.

Originally Posted by Gmanc711

Joe, I think the tension may help us get to the bottom of question 3.

I beg forgiveness for attempting to censor or restrain the chaotic, quixotic, yet somehow refreshing, lexicon of thought that is Question 3.

Originally Posted by onlydarksets

Nice try, but it was a different question. I challenged whether Question 3 was even ASKED - not whether it was ANSWERED. I know what you are thinking - how can a question be answered if it isn't asked? Therein lies the mystery of Question 3. You have much to learn...

And onlydarksets, you are correct sir - both in you reference to the prior posts and in that I have much to learn.

But as Question 3 has shown, don't we all?

[onlydarksets]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

But as Question 3 has shown, don't we all?

Without question, JoeRedskin. Very Socratic - "Wisdom is knowing how little we know". Of course, Socrates also said, "I drank what?".