![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,845
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,452
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
The bottom line is we have a middle of the pack QB and it may always be that way. It's not like we've got a situation that's in Cleveland, Oakland, Tampa Bay, Carolina or KC. I mean Cleveland just benched Quinn to go back to Anderson. I don't think it's gets any worse than that.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 68
Posts: 322
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Campbell is OK, no better. I think he's worse than his statistics. He can't hit a wide-open receiver (especially in stride.)
In the first drive of our last two games he has missed wide-open possible TDs 2 weeks ago: underthrew a wide-open Kelly, and if he can't throw that route he can't throw a fade. (I've never seen him successfully complete a fade pass. Think about how that impacts the defensive schemes inside the 20.) Last week he threw a bad pass "at" Santana Moss at the 3. The only time I can remember him throwing to Moss in stride (no leap or adjustment necessary) Moss turned into a TD this last week. I don't remember him throwing nice bombs, the most enjoyable play to watch in football. His passes don't allow the receivers to make plays since they have to leave their feet most of time unless it's a pattern from side to side. For these reasons the wide receivers all of a sudden got TDs with Collins. Another question I have: Is it Zorn or Campbell who decides that 5 pass plays in a row will go to Moss, 3 in a row to Cartwright, etc? I can't see the field in the telecast so I don't know who's open, but is Zorn calling play after play to the same receiver, or is Campbell checking down over and over to the same receiver? Is it really possible that Cooley wasn't getting open this game? I'm starting to think that we should use Campbell outside the 20 and Collins inside the 20. Collins can throw a fade, so the other team would have to respect that near the goal-line. On the other hand, Collins's noodle arm wouldn't be as obvious in this range. It is interesting to note that in a pre-season poll, most on this board considered Campbell the weakest of the NFC East QBs and Collins the strongest of the backups. I know it's not what is normally done, but does it hurt to give it a try? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Its funny. I am looking at the free agent QBs next year and I see nothing special. In the draft I see McCoy & Tebow. Don't know if Bradford's stock has dropped because of injury or not. There may be some sleepers but with our fans it would pretty much have to be a sure shot or we will run the next QB out of town also. Then we have Colt on IR. Those are pretty much our choices. Unless we make some type of trade. Which would have to be for picks and that would leave us with less picks to get a quality OL. We really aren't in a good posiiton to make a move for a QB but anything is possible. If Bradford plays well the rest of the season I think he would be the best option for an NFL ready QB. We will see starting Saturday against Miami. So I think our best bet now is to hope Campbell pans out. If he does he still might be gone because of the front office antics this offseason and the lack of support he receives from the fans. Its also depends on who our coach is next year. Another option is Vick. Ronnie Brown will be a free agent next year. That would be a good tandem to pick up. Brown is 27 though. So he would only help us for a few years. You also have Jerrious Norwoord. I just think FO has made the situation kind of sticky. The best bet is to root for JC and hope Zorn makes him into a formidable QB by the end of the year. I think he is on his way. We jsut need to have a little more patience.
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21 HATERS << Misery Loves Company Last edited by dmvskinzfan08; 10-01-2009 at 01:32 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
OMG, our 30+ pts scoreless streak is almost as long as our defensive touchdownless streak. Who knew?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
![]()
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,452
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
On one hand, the frequency at which we score 30+ points means nothing. We could employ the chuck and duck and score 33 points a week while losing games. On the other, teams that score that much that frequently usually get contributions from playmakers on all sides of the football. With all due respect to Santana Moss' decisive TD in Detroit on a punt return, as long as you're hung up on points, start where the deficiency is most glaring. And yeah, the offense scores at a below average rate no matter how far you break em down. But if the point is just how inept the team is at scoring, well, let's do that.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
imo our O line in pass protect this year has been pretty good, especially since we are not max protecting like years past.
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 69
Posts: 868
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
49/83 (59%) 606 yds, 4 td's, 2 int's Mark Sanchez NYJ
69/102 (68%) 783 yds, 3 td's, 2 int's Jason Campbell WAS 87/142 (61%) 871 yds, 3 td's, 2 int's Tom Brady NE According to the numbers, the Jets and the Patriots should be asking for Sanchez and Brady to be benched.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Same with Matt Ryan.
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21 HATERS << Misery Loves Company |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 48
Posts: 1,851
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
Catch me on YouTube ! http://www.youtube.com/user/DowntimeRB?feature=mhw5 The "punishment" by the league : "It's like getting a ticket for going too fast on a road a week ago and they changed the speed limit today" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
We are not talking about Mark Brunell. Brad Johnson is old that's all. But I think he did win a Superbowl after he left us. Or was that in my dreams? So you are blaming JC for us not getting Pass Interference calls? Huh? Don't know about deep ball accuracy. He hasn't thrown that many. That is something he can work on if it is an issue. Umm. So I guess he's too dumb to call audibles? When he has called the plays whether it is garbage time or not he scored. If he was so horrible he wouldn't even be able to do that. Umm the West Coast offense is mainly intermediate throws. Your right. He puts the ball on the numbers with velocity instead of throwing to a spot or area. I woudn't blame him because our WRs keep dropping the ball. If he throws it somewhere they can catch it and he makes a completion then it really doesn't matter to me. Perfect example of throwing to an area Delhomme. He is responsible for his INTs for the most part. But some of them are because he is throwing to an area and the defense is there instead of the WR. You really want to do that with Thomas or Kelly? LOL. Even saying that Delhomme has been horrible. Maybe we should pick him up? Maybe you would be happy with a guy that throws to an area instead of completing passes. Our young receivers are not precise route runners at this point so it would be a disaster if that happened. But you are right. He is absoultey horrible. He can't learn from his mistakes He can't grow as a QB. He is the worst QB in the NFL. He holds the ball too long. He isn't smart. He has a slow wind up release.. [end sarcasm] Did I forget anything else? This is getting so old..
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21 HATERS << Misery Loves Company Last edited by dmvskinzfan08; 10-01-2009 at 07:16 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|