![]() |
|
|
#346 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
We got Billy Jean at one end and Hatcher at the other, where else do you put Paea other than nose?
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#347 | |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Quote:
I would like to see both Knighton and Paea come in. Need to rotate to keep fresh anyway. Baker as the top replacement for all 3 spots along the line would be adequate depth.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#348 |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
If we put Paea at nose, it would seem Cofield isn't returning, as rumored.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
|
#349 |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Why are people thinking we'd put Paea at nose? That's not even a question. Dude is 300 pounds.
Baker would be the clear nose unless somebody else was brought in too.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#350 | |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Quote:
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#351 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,141
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Quote:
If we the free agency route, Barksdale would be a better option IMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#352 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,037
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Keim tweeted out Paea is a different position from Dan Williams...so obviously we still are still pursuing Knighton, Williams and any other potential NT.
Like how the FO focused on D-Line first over any other area. Smart. Aging, injuried, and underproductive group.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
#353 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Given that we are looking to sign more interior D-line, I would assume our number 5 pick, if not traded down, would be used for a pass rusher. Im sure if McC thinks Shelton is that good, he wouldnt pass him over, but it seems he is setting himself up to take Gregory, Ray, or Beasley with that pick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#354 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,412
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Quote:
What if we sign Paea and Knighton (as Schneed suggested), then draft a top pass rusher for ROLB? It could happen. That would give us a much improved front 7, IMO. We'd still need an ILB but, other than that, we'd be set up nicely for quite awhile.
__________________
I'm a big Caitlin Clark fan! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#355 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#356 | |
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Quote:
Packers may have to pay $7 million per year to keep Bulaga - JSOnline But, yes, if he will sign with us for less money than he wanted to stay in G.B. with Aaron Rodgers and a winning team ... sure, sign that tackle to a contract.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#357 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,141
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Why do you think Green Bay's letting him walk? They drafted and developed him, and they still don't want to pay 7-9 million or whatever it's going to be. Why should we? Chances are he wouldn't play as well here anyway, on top of already being overpaid.
The Jaguars can have Parnell for 6.5. They're the Jaguars. |
|
|
|
|
|
#358 | ||
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Quote:
Quote:
At 7M/year or more, I suggest we follow their lead.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#359 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
|
|
|
#360 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,037
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Quote:
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|