Broncos to trade Cutler

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Well, as I understand it, if Campbell does end up in Denver it won't be because they wanted him but because we forced him on them

What the Redskins are reportedly proposing is not earth shattering though.

And that would be?

[halodoc]

Anyone think the Skins want cutler because they plan on going after Mike Shanahan next year ?

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

For me, its Cutlers alleged alcohol abuse. A diabetic has no business drinking alcohol AT ALL, let alone in the amounts Cutler is reported of as drinking. It also shows a pattern of self-destructive behavior. Cutler is too risky of a move.

That said, if we did trade a plethora of picks for Cutler, the Skins could make up for it by trading Campbell to Chicago for Briggs, straight up... oh wait, that makes no sense, nevermind.

I was hesitant to bring the diabetes up cuz it's so common...but yeah that should be a serious consideration. My uncle was a fantastic b-ball player, ready to get a full ride scholarship to college until his diabetes worsened, which can happen quickly and w/o much warning.

...I hate this Cutler business so much. Gonna have to dose myself to sleep tonight w/ something strong.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Which is...???

Um let's see. I think what I heard (who heard it from a friend who heard it from friend who heard it from another you been messin' around...you take it on the run baby!!!) was Campbell, the 13th, and a 2nd or 3rd in 2010 for Cutler and their 3rd rounder (just before we pick) in 2009. But, I don't think the Broncos really want Campbell or draft picks for that matter. Golston or Montgomery could be appealing to them though

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

What's upsetting people the most about this alleged deal? Is it losing draft picks potentially? Is it just the idea of change again?

for me it would just be giving up too much IF that ends up being the case

who's to say he doesn't fail here due to other inadequacies.. or that we can't find a few other potential stars due to potential picks lost.. if campbell fails this coming up year we could just say whatever, draft a 1st rounder next year, throw in a vet or colt for a year and try that out if the 1st rounder doesn't show ability to go at the moment

[70Chip]

[Reverse Psychology] SmootSmack doesn't know anything. He probably doesn't even work for ESPN. He has no sources or inside dope. If he did he would tell us.

[SmootSmack]

I, for one, hope we do trade out of the first round (heck, the first day) because I got my wife a really cool Valentine's Day gift but like an idiot I scheduled it for April 25 so I'll be missing the draft anyway.

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Um let's see. I think what I heard (who heard it from a friend who heard it from friend who heard it from another you been messin' around...you take it on the run baby!!!) was Campbell, the 13th, and a 2nd or 3rd in 2010 for Cutler and their 3rd rounder (just before we pick) in 2009. But, I don't think the Broncos really want Campbell or draft picks for that matter. Golston or Montgomery could be appealing to them though

So... basically we take it right up a wazzoo. And why wouldn't they want picks or Campbell.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by 70Chip

[Reverse Psychology] SmootSmack doesn't know anything. He probably doesn't even work for ESPN. He has no sources or inside dope. If he did he would tell us.

I actually work for Al-Jazeera TV in DC. I'm a double reverse covert undercover spy. If I stop talking sports...the terrorists win!

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Um let's see. I think what I heard (who heard it from a friend who heard it from friend who heard it from another you been messin' around...you take it on the run baby!!!) was Campbell, the 13th, and a 2nd or 3rd in 2010 for Cutler and their 3rd rounder (just before we pick) in 2009. But, I don't think the Broncos really want Campbell or draft picks for that matter. Golston or Montgomery could be appealing to them though

In which case, as you said earlier, a 3rd team will pretty much have to be involved for it to go down. I wonder if Chicago or Tampa would like the idea of Campbell?

[NM Redskin]

I have a feelin the minute Aprils fools day is over it released that we got Cutler.

[70Chip]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I actually work for Al-Jazeera TV in DC. I'm a double reverse covert undercover spy. If I stop talking sports...the terrorists win!

How fiendishly clever.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by The Goat

So... basically we take it right up a wazzoo. And why wouldn't they want picks or Campbell.

Sorry forgot to add another late (like 5th or 6th round) pick for us. Don't exactly know why they don't want picks. And I guess Coach Doogie isn't that big on Campbell

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I, for one, hope we do trade out of the first round (heck, the first day) because I got my wife a really cool Valentine's Day gift but like an idiot I scheduled it for April 25 so I'll be missing the draft anyway.

cool story Latey McLaterson

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Sorry forgot to add another late (like 5th or 6th round) pick for us. Don't exactly know why they don't want picks. And I guess Coach Doogie isn't that big on Campbell

Hmm, maybe we should dangle Golston or Monty to get one of those picks they don't want. LOL.