Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Portis will have 2,000 all purpose yards in 2006

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2006, 09:03 PM   #1
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: Portis will have 2,000 all purpose yards in 2006

Winning will make everyone happy.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2006, 09:32 PM   #2
jordanz301
Special Teams
 
jordanz301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: damascus, maryland
Age: 37
Posts: 161
Re: Portis will have 2,000 all purpose yards in 2006

i really honestly dont think we needed both of them, i think moss, lloyd, patten thrash, and jacobs would have been fine or moss, randle el, patten.... i really didnt think we were gnna bring in two high profile receivers. i mean one used to be the #1 guy so is gnna expect to get #1 looks frm the quarterback even if he knows hes #2 or 3. then we have randle el who tried at #2 but didnt do so hott. we shouldnt have signed both. we had a more than capable receiver with patten. but now that we have them im happy i jst wih they were SO high profile. but portis o ya this is gnna be the season where he REALLY proves with his YPC that the champ portis trade was in favor to washington. hell prove em wrong jst think of the big run he made his first carry as a skin, but every sunday!
__________________
"meet sean taylor"
jordanz301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 08:52 AM   #3
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: Portis will have 2,000 all purpose yards in 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by jordanz301
i really honestly dont think we needed both of them, i think moss, lloyd, patten thrash, and jacobs would have been fine or moss, randle el, patten.... i really didnt think we were gnna bring in two high profile receivers. i mean one used to be the #1 guy so is gnna expect to get #1 looks frm the quarterback even if he knows hes #2 or 3. then we have randle el who tried at #2 but didnt do so hott. we shouldnt have signed both. we had a more than capable receiver with patten. but now that we have them im happy i jst wih they were SO high profile. but portis o ya this is gnna be the season where he REALLY proves with his YPC that the champ portis trade was in favor to washington. hell prove em wrong jst think of the big run he made his first carry as a skin, but every sunday!
It looks like we could be running alot of 3 WR sets with Saunders, so having good WR depth is pretty important.

Look at what happened last year, Patten went down and we were screwed at the #2 WR spot, and forget about the #3 WR that was just non-existent.

After last year I'm happy we went out and got 2 quality WRs rather than just putting all our eggs in one basket by picking up just one guy.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 09:43 AM   #4
PWNED
The Starter
 
PWNED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ZOMGZZZ!!111
Age: 33
Posts: 1,160
Re: Portis will have 2,000 all purpose yards in 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
It looks like we could be running alot of 3 WR sets with Saunders, so having good WR depth is pretty important.

Look at what happened last year, Patten went down and we were screwed at the #2 WR spot, and forget about the #3 WR that was just non-existent.

After last year I'm happy we went out and got 2 quality WRs rather than just putting all our eggs in one basket by picking up just one guy.
right and we'll have at LEAST patten and hopefully thrash as depth in case someone goes down. people who ARENT just placeholdres like jacobs and farris.
__________________
143 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal.
PWNED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 12:43 AM   #5
drew54
The Starter
 
drew54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: IOWA
Age: 42
Posts: 1,324
Re: Portis will have 2,000 all purpose yards in 2006

This would be the F***ING GREATES THING EVER!!!! I have him on my fantasy keeper league. Last two years havent always been so pretty. But last year he was a lot more consistant. I can't wait. I'm also thinking about drafting Jason Campbell with my last pick in the draft.

But I would rather lose every fantasy game if it meant the Skins win every Sunday, and ESPECIALLY on THANKSGIVING.
__________________
No pressure, no diamonds.
drew54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 02:45 AM   #6
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: Portis will have 2,000 all purpose yards in 2006

i think moss is and definately coles are better blockers than El.

El is very willing to block, I don't know if lloyd is.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 02:57 AM   #7
dcweldon
Camp Scrub
 
dcweldon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA/Easton, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 65
Re: Portis will have 2,000 all purpose yards in 2006

Portis can defintely reach that mark. It is completely realistic, even if you didn't have the new additions to this offense, you could make that argument. Portis ran for over 1,500 yards last season, and most of the plays that called for him last year did not include going out in the flat, he did on occasion, but if they had called it more early on in the year, good lord, who knows what his numbers would have been like. Being that it took the team about three or four weeks to finally get the offense clicking, just imagine what they would have done if they started the season with a bang.

People can go ahead an say all they want negatively about Randle El, but it doesn't matter, what the skins did with throwing Moss in the slot on more than one occasion last year, Randle El and Moss will be flip flopping that spot alot now, and that combo alone will be deadly. And if Lloyd can get into a rythm, add Cooley to the mix...oooo i get tingly thinking about it. If Mark is the starter, I expect him to improve his numbers from last season, which was one of his best seasons.

We do need to fix one problem, which I hope Al Saunders will address...running a three-wide shot gun on every third down. We did this ALOT on every third down play toward the end of the season, and eventually it caught up to us in the playoffs.
dcweldon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 09:42 AM   #8
PWNED
The Starter
 
PWNED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ZOMGZZZ!!111
Age: 33
Posts: 1,160
Re: Portis will have 2,000 all purpose yards in 2006

yes joel, as well you should. theres lots to look forward to next year.
__________________
143 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal.
PWNED is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.81081 seconds with 10 queries