Parcells and T.O

5RINGS · 03-30-2006, 06:29 PM

Lots of wishful thinking here.

1.) Dallas has a better O line this year. we all saw Daniels get 28 sacks against our CFL linemen last year. It could not have been worse. Really, that line wasn't as good as the Longhorns line -or the BC eagles!

I luv Larry Allen, but he can' t play four quarters anymore. We had our Centre pulling cause Allen could no longer get there.

2.) Newman isn't panning out? WHAT? Teams don't even throw his way.

3.) TO and Parcells. TO in the first year is always an angel. He got his money, and he has never played for a guy with two rings and a bust waiting for him in Canton. Gibbs would've handled TO also, and don't think they weren't interested in signing him.

TO opens the field for the running game. No more 8 man fronts every down.
McNabb is better than Bledsoe but Bledsoe is on a team that actually uses the running back out of the backfield!! Philly throws wayyyyy too much.
Signing TO and Fabiani makes Dallas the front runner in the East this year.

That Guy · 03-30-2006, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5RINGS

Signing TO and Fabiani makes Dallas the front runner in the East this year.

talk about wishful thinking... where are you getting the rest of your oline and how are your dbs going to keep up with the skins WRs? line up 20 yards deep and see if we can complete uncontested slants and use open running lanes?

5RINGS · 03-30-2006, 07:14 PM

teams have tried the three fast wr route before - worked for you guys in the eighties - but like any scheme there is a defense.

Our O line is better by default - couldn't possibly be worse...

jermus22 · 03-30-2006, 08:57 PM

I'm not worried about T.O. as long as we have Shawn Springs and Sean Taylor in our lineup. I remember replays of the way they handled him in the Eagles games. Taylor laid out Owens a few times and managed to shut him up pretty quick.

jermus22 · 03-30-2006, 08:59 PM

I agree that Dallas' offense could be better, but a lot depends on the o-line gelling and also T.O.'s behavior.

That Guy · 03-30-2006, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5RINGS

teams have tried the three fast wr route before - worked for you guys in the eighties - but like any scheme there is a defense.

Our O line is better by default - couldn't possibly be worse...

yeah, but you couldn't stop one fast WR last year.

D'BOYZ · 04-03-2006, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy

talk about wishful thinking... where are you getting the rest of your oline and how are your dbs going to keep up with the skins WRs? line up 20 yards deep and see if we can complete uncontested slants and use open running lanes?

ok we upgraded the line by adding fabini getting back Adams that's the thing that hurth us the must and signing Kyle Kosier it isn't the best Oline but we sure did an upgrade.

again you talk about or dbs when yo ushould be more worried about your own dbs against glenn, TO, Crayton and Witten both teams have weapons we'll have to see who use them better.

Redskins8588 · 04-03-2006, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D'BOYZ

ok we upgraded the line by adding fabini getting back Adams that's the thing that hurth us the must and signing Kyle Kosier it isn't the best Oline but we sure did an upgrade.

So maybe you upgraded some spots on your o-line, but do you really think that they will gel this quickly? Look at how long it takes o-lines to really come together...

D'BOYZ · 04-03-2006, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins8588

So maybe you upgraded some spots on your o-line, but do you really think that they will gel this quickly? Look at how long it takes o-lines to really come together...

We can get worse than last year so that's an upgrade of some sorts, really I don't expect then to go to the pro bowl or become all-pro they just have to be better then last year o-line thats not asking a lot.

5RINGS · 03-31-2006, 10:14 AM

<strong>That Guy</strong>

you are right. We couldn't stop one last year. But we had no pass rush either, Brunell had a week to heave those up. Hopefully we have a rush this year.

<strong>jermus22</strong>

If you put Springs on our fastest receiver - Glenn - and use Taylor to double with the other cb on TO, you have to cover Witten with who - Archuleta? Yeah your HB/TE Cooley did okay when we tried to cover him with a SS or an OLB. TO helps us set up that same defensive headache.

PSUSkinsFan21 · 03-31-2006, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5RINGS

If you put Springs on our fastest receiver - Glenn - and use Taylor to double with the other cb on TO, you have to cover Witten with who - Archuleta? Yeah your HB/TE Cooley did okay when we tried to cover him with a SS or an OLB. TO helps us set up that same defensive headache.

In TO's last 3 games against us, he's had 10 catches for 103 yards and 1 TD total.......in 3 games. I'm not worried about TO ever giving us a defenseive headache.

5RINGS · 03-31-2006, 10:27 AM

A good team with a smart coach with talent in the secondary could stop the Philly attack that was pass, pass, pass, pass to the rb, then pass, pass, pass.

TO will open the game up for Dallas' running game.

PSUSkinsFan21 · 03-31-2006, 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5RINGS

A good team with a smart coach with talent in the secondary could stop the Philly attack that was pass, pass, pass, pass to the rb, then pass, pass, pass.

TO will open the game up for Dallas' running game.

Hmmm, that's interesting because in TO's last 3 games against Dallas (including the partial game in which he broke his leg), TO had 13 catches for 208 yards and 3 TDs.......so by implication......

I agree with you that Dallas's running game stands to benefit from TO being there......but against us I'm just not worried. If he ever got the better of us, I might be concerned......but we've consistently shut him down regardless of the offense he's playing for, even when all the other teams in the NFL got torched by him.

D'BOYZ · 04-03-2006, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSUSkinsFan21

Hmmm, that's interesting because in TO's last 3 games against Dallas (including the partial game in which he broke his leg), TO had 13 catches for 208 yards and 3 TDs.......so by implication......

I agree with you that Dallas's running game stands to benefit from TO being there......but against us I'm just not worried. If he ever got the better of us, I might be concerned......but we've consistently shut him down regardless of the offense he's playing for, even when all the other teams in the NFL got torched by him.

ok I don't count the first game as an eagle with Owens because our defense wasn't as good that year as it was last year and we will get better this year after all our rookies have 1 year under their belt.

he didn't play you last year but when he played us he only had 5 catches for 50 yards, sure Moss dominated our defense, but we controlle other wr like Smith, Burres, Williams etc.. and again we jsut need to upgrade the FS spot.

5RINGS · 03-31-2006, 10:14 AM

oops,

no HTML here...

If I only looked up and saw the bold symbol....

03-30-2006, 06:29 PM	#1
5RINGS Closet Redskins Fan Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 495	Re: Parcells and T.O Lots of wishful thinking here. 1.) Dallas has a better O line this year. we all saw Daniels get 28 sacks against our CFL linemen last year. It could not have been worse. Really, that line wasn't as good as the Longhorns line -or the BC eagles! I luv Larry Allen, but he can' t play four quarters anymore. We had our Centre pulling cause Allen could no longer get there. 2.) Newman isn't panning out? WHAT? Teams don't even throw his way. 3.) TO and Parcells. TO in the first year is always an angel. He got his money, and he has never played for a guy with two rings and a bust waiting for him in Canton. Gibbs would've handled TO also, and don't think they weren't interested in signing him. TO opens the field for the running game. No more 8 man fronts every down. McNabb is better than Bledsoe but Bledsoe is on a team that actually uses the running back out of the backfield!! Philly throws wayyyyy too much. Signing TO and Fabiani makes Dallas the front runner in the East this year. __________________ I am a complete and unabashed Romosexual.

03-30-2006, 07:14 PM	#3
5RINGS Closet Redskins Fan Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 495	Re: Parcells and T.O teams have tried the three fast wr route before - worked for you guys in the eighties - but like any scheme there is a defense. Our O line is better by default - couldn't possibly be worse... __________________ I am a complete and unabashed Romosexual.

03-30-2006, 08:57 PM	#4
jermus22 Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Frankfort, KY Age: 43 Posts: 336	Re: Parcells and T.O I'm not worried about T.O. as long as we have Shawn Springs and Sean Taylor in our lineup. I remember replays of the way they handled him in the Eagles games. Taylor laid out Owens a few times and managed to shut him up pretty quick. __________________ Win it in the trenches.

03-30-2006, 08:59 PM	#5
jermus22 Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Frankfort, KY Age: 43 Posts: 336	Re: Parcells and T.O I agree that Dallas' offense could be better, but a lot depends on the o-line gelling and also T.O.'s behavior. __________________ Win it in the trenches.

03-31-2006, 10:14 AM	#10
5RINGS Closet Redskins Fan Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 495	Re: Parcells and T.O <strong>That Guy</strong> you are right. We couldn't stop one last year. But we had no pass rush either, Brunell had a week to heave those up. Hopefully we have a rush this year. <strong>jermus22</strong> If you put Springs on our fastest receiver - Glenn - and use Taylor to double with the other cb on TO, you have to cover Witten with who - Archuleta? Yeah your HB/TE Cooley did okay when we tried to cover him with a SS or an OLB. TO helps us set up that same defensive headache. __________________ I am a complete and unabashed Romosexual.

03-31-2006, 10:27 AM	#12
5RINGS Closet Redskins Fan Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 495	Re: Parcells and T.O A good team with a smart coach with talent in the secondary could stop the Philly attack that was pass, pass, pass, pass to the rb, then pass, pass, pass. TO will open the game up for Dallas' running game. __________________ I am a complete and unabashed Romosexual.

03-31-2006, 10:14 AM	#15
5RINGS Closet Redskins Fan Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 495	Re: Parcells and T.O oops, no HTML here... If I only looked up and saw the bold symbol.... __________________ I am a complete and unabashed Romosexual.

Parcells and T.O

Locker Room Main Forum