Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


G-men take Sinorice

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-30-2006, 01:16 AM   #31
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
Re: G-men take Sinorice

I am only talking about a few inches, but Sin.Mos is TINY! He is 5-8, even I am bigger than him. And I dont think he is more than 180 max, this guy is smaller than Santana and Steve Smith, by a lot I think. I do think after a certain high, say past 5-9 or 10 its gotta be harder for you. Maybe the tighter interference rules will help him, but I still gotta think he is a bit overhyped.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-30-2006, 01:16 AM   #32
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,577
Re: G-men take Sinorice

Well, have they already given up on Tuck after one season, in which he probably didn't play much due to the great play of the starters? I mean, it's not like Osi is getting old, he's only been in the league for 3 years.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 01:21 AM   #33
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: G-men take Sinorice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Undoubtedly. I think they got the most value from their picks. While the Jets made out well too, the Eagles got the most value from their picks. The only team that might have done better is the Cardinals.
broncos got cutler and a true proven #1 (though he'll cost a ton).

rams had a VERY good outing (4-5 starters, depending on whether they go 2 TE or 3 WR):
tye hill CB
jon alston OLB
claude wroten DT (talent, but some arrests)
dominique byrd TE
joe klopfenstein TE

they aren't kidding about trying to fix that D either.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 01:47 AM   #34
SanFranSkinsFan
Special Teams
 
SanFranSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 102
Re: G-men take Sinorice

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins
I am only talking about a few inches, but Sin.Mos is TINY! He is 5-8, even I am bigger than him. And I dont think he is more than 180 max, this guy is smaller than Santana and Steve Smith, by a lot I think. I do think after a certain high, say past 5-9 or 10 its gotta be harder for you. Maybe the tighter interference rules will help him, but I still gotta think he is a bit overhyped.
I still wish we had him. We could cut Patten and go with the "Moss Bros Connection." It's bad enough the Gmen have LaVar but hopefully Carlos will rough the rookie up and we all know that Sin. Moss be looking for Sean Taylor and Archuletta when he comes over the middle.
SanFranSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 08:13 AM   #35
BrudLee
Playmaker
 
BrudLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
Re: G-men take Sinorice

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigSKINBauer
yeah, every team in this division, no in the conference is getting amazing and the skins are starting to look worse.
I would suggest just the opposite.

Two of the three teams in our division drafted players they need to contribute in the first year. The Eagles will be in big trouble if they don't get impact minutes out of Bunkley, and Justice may unseat Tra Thomas. The Cowboys will need significan't time from Fasano (who will be taking the 2nd TE spot), and Carpenter should start opposite Ware.

The problem with that is that counting on rookies to be integral members of a championship squad is an absolute crapshoot. While first round busts get all the press, players from all over the board wash out every year. Expecting excellence from draftees is good, requiring it for success ultimately leads to disappointment.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too.
BrudLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 08:27 AM   #36
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: G-men take Sinorice

im reading tra thomas might retire due to ongoing back issues.justice had better be ready.other than qb,this might be the toughest position to play right away and suceed
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 08:43 AM   #37
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
Re: G-men take Sinorice

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby
Well, have they already given up on Tuck after one season, in which he probably didn't play much due to the great play of the starters? I mean, it's not like Osi is getting old, he's only been in the league for 3 years.
I thought taking Kiwanuka was a brilliant pick. The way defensive ends can flame out on an instant is all the more reason to take him. Sooner or later, Strahan will start showing his age. If you're set pretty much everywhere else, and the Giants are for the most part, then you've got to take the best player you believe is available.

Now, let's apply that philosophy to offensive tackle: Assuming we were set at linebacker, and according to Gibbs, that was the one area where we were a little "thin", Winston Justice would have been a perfect pick for us -- assuming we still made the trade to move up to #35. Samuels and Jansen are the bookend tackles who we can depend on to anchor our line for more seasons to come. But having a highly rated backup who can learn the system, perhaps play some at guard when he's needed, and be there when one of them gets injured can be a vital aspect to any team. The same is true for the Giants at defensive end, or any other team at any position.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.70740 seconds with 10 queries