![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Without a doubt Gary Clark's receiving ability has shown to be superior to Lloyd's but there's not a lot of dissimiliarity in attitude. Something that easy to overlook when your catching 75+ 1200+ yards and 8+ TDs every year. Don't get me wrong. I love Gary Clark. He's basically a local legend down in these parts (SW VA).
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
i think I'm in the minority when it comes to Lloyd, too. nothing wrong with alittle swagger. i don't remember Lloyd dropping any balls last season. it was just Brunell wouldn't throw to him. should be different this year
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Based on how last year ended ARE should be listed ahead of Lloyd. Lloyd has a lot to prove right now.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
ARE is a nice player but he is not a solid NFL #2 WR. If our offense is going to improve and go to the next level we are going to need Lloyd to play like he is capable of playing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Quote:
Like I said, he has a lot to prove right now. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 2 Minutes away from Fedex Field, Maryland
Posts: 363
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: richmond va
Age: 64
Posts: 252
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
i believe this in my heart of hearts. lloyd must and will step up this season and be a threat . his career depend on it really if u think about it. who else is going to take a chance on a overpaid , underachieving head case wide out after 2 teams get the same results. he has to see this if only for his own good....
__________________
I will choose freewill. alex, geddy, and neil permanent waves 1980"www.rush.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Beaufort SC
Age: 46
Posts: 933
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
I really don't think that either is a strong # 2 guy from what we say last year. I hope that at least one of them took last year to heart, and went home and had a long talk in front of a mirror. We need to have a strong guy this year other than Moss.
__________________
We are always superbowl contenders in March!!! HTTR!!!!!!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
I was listening to Gibbs presser the other day and the way he talks about BL you would think he was Gary Clark. Gibbs always says he is real talented, he is real graceful catching the ball, has all this ability. I even read that he and Springs trained together in Ariz and Springs was saying the same stuff. I mean Springs said that Lloyd was one of the most talented WR's he had ever been around. Now that's a bold statement.
So why doesn't all this ability transfer to the field?? Yes, you can blame some of it on Brunell, but that only goes so far. Plus he never did shit in SF. I'm looking for this guy to really take off this year. I'm talking about 60-80 catches and 6-8 TD's. He needs to put up or shut up and go away. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Antwaan burned shawn springs yesterday. ARE had to dive down for the catch and might not have caught it. I think the ref might of said no catch but i had a better look at it than even the ref did and it looked good. Maybe out of bounds but ARE caught it. Shawn turned around indicating no catch with his hands. Small tidbit from camp, thats all.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Quote:
I question Brandon Lloyd's work ethic and his attention to detail. He's a straight up burner, and just wants to use his speed. So far in his career, he has shown no interest in improving on the nuances of route-running. I'll be very surprised if he has a good season. I think he's a total bum.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
LLoyd's numbers were pathetic last year (all-time record low for a #2 WR) and went far beyond the collective struggles of the offense. We still had guys that produced offensively, and along with his lack of production his attitude problems were probably a bigger concern.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 43
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
In my outlook, I would like to see our #3 receiver have solid stats as well. So if Lloyd is a #3 I just want to see him put up Brandon Stokley numbers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|