![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Day 1 Draft Grade | |||
A |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
39 | 24.07% |
B |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
81 | 50.00% |
C |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
33 | 20.37% |
D |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 3.70% |
F |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 1.85% |
Voters: 162. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Day 1 Draft Grade
I have to see the rest of the draft but I think it's going to include Josh Johnson, Marcus Dixon, and hopefully god forbid, an offensive lineman. For now I'll give them a B-. The matchups and packages are all fun to think about, but after a while you worry about the guys upfront.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Day 1 Draft Grade
A for value picks, but I went B because I think we could have gotten a great D End instead of a TE.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: Day 1 Draft Grade
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Propane and propane accessories
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 56
Posts: 4,719
|
Re: Day 1 Draft Grade
Given our many needs, we should have used at least ONE pick here on the DL or OL, or at least a DB. Failing to do that was a mistake. We have too many WRs now and not enough linemen. The FO spent so much time focused on WRs that it skewed their thinking and their rankings, IMO. I can see using a 2 TE set, so I'm ok with that, but still. We are NOT a deep team, and we needed to address a lot of areas. After the nice trade-down, this was a disappointment.
C-
__________________
Hail from Houston! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
Re: Day 1 Draft Grade
I'll go C....I loved our first pick, but I just dont get why we didnt take a DE with 48 or 51...I mean what can you do, but seems like were not adressing that need
__________________
#21 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 73
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: Day 1 Draft Grade
Quote:
My first reaction to the 2nd and 3rd 2nd rounders, was: 1. Whaaaaaat? 2. Huuuuuuuh? 3. What were they thinking? 4. Three 2nd rounders, and we end up with this? 5. Where is the OL, or DL? 6. Where is that DE I've been pushing for for 13 years straight? 7. I don't get it! 8. Then I thought of 4 wide set with double TEs! 9. Then I thought of the Redzone! 10. I remembered the 8th ranked Defense! 11. Oh, yeah, I was always in the half of the class that made the top half possible, right there at C!
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Day 1 Draft Grade
Quote:
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Day 1 Draft Grade
Maybe I'm the only one who was a bit critical but why did we get two WRs? Doesn't make much sense to me at all unless we trade one of them. Also why draft a TE? We have a great starter and we just need to pickup cheap veteran depth at TE.
Would've been nice to see some defensive needs addressed.
__________________
Vacancy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lake Travis, Texas
Age: 44
Posts: 786
|
Re: Day 1 Draft Grade
I gave a D just for the first day. Im not rating low because of my opinion on our picks, im basing it off of the rest of the NFL and the picks other teams made. I think 2 WR and a TE is fine, and im ok with that. However KC gets an A, not us. I feel like our front office is very good at judging talent and we can maybe pull off a C by the end of the 7th round.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 2 Minutes away from Fedex Field, Maryland
Posts: 363
|
Re: Day 1 Draft Grade
I dont know why so many people hate these picks. We added 2 big receivers who can go out and catch the ball. We got probably the strongest receiver in the draft in Devin Thomas so I'm pretty grateful. I love Kelly's height and I was rooting for us to get him. As far as defense, I think we'll find someone at DE in the 4th round. We've had luck drafting DL on the second day of the draft.
Also, as far as addressing our OL needs, UNDRAFTED FREE AGENTS! We got a good one last year in Stephon Heyer so everyone, don't panic. We should embrace the beginning of our success on offense and the success that Jason Campbell will have. Can anyone say 30 TDs? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: Day 1 Draft Grade
Unquestionably an A for value, at least if you are evaluating these players based on common consensus.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 56
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: Day 1 Draft Grade
I'm going with a C for now. They could have had an A, but they passed up a good DE in Campbell. They could have easily taken him there and picked up either Davis or Kelly a couple of picks later (whichever was still there).
If you believe you pick the best player available in the second round regardless of need, then I'd grade us an A. I believe that you do it in the 1st round, but not 2nd. By the time you get to the 2nd, player talent is leveling out and I believe you have to address need. What I'm guessing, is that they have a DT or OG targeted in the 3rd and 4th. Maybe they figured if they couldn't land Chad Johnson in a draft day trade, they would draft WR and then look to pick up a DE/DT somehow after June 1. It just seems hard for me to believe that with all the talk of Blanche identifying a big DT that can collapse the pocket as his biggest need that they have ignored d-line all together. Maybe wouldn't have happened regardless because of where we were picking. I wonder what our picks would have looked like if we moved up 3 spots in each of our picks. Seems like we just missed a few guys.
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 685
|
Re: Day 1 Draft Grade
Grade = B. Moss played 14 games last year and got 61 receptions (and in how many of those was he gimpy?). ARE played in 15 and had 51 receptions. Thats less total receptions than many #1 receivers in the league. Caldwell/Mix are obviously not the answer. When you look at past draft classes, 30-40% of guys end up being busts. What we got were two solid WRs and even if one gets Rod Gardner disease, at least we have a shot a productive big receiver. As far as TE, after Cooley, we don't have much of anything. At least now, Campbell is assured of a safety valve on every play and when we go to a 2 TE formation for run plays, other teams will have to respect the pass.
I would like to have picked up some linemen as well but we got some great value with those picks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 15
|
Re: Day 1 Draft Grade
C+
Without more help on O-line, JC will be scrambling. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
I don't need a reason. I am all powerful.
C+
Individually, the players we picked not only are all valuable, but they're specifically valuable to this team. We got two big receivers who appear to have been 1 and 1A on our draft board. We got a big pass-catching TE. All those things will help this team. My concern is that we ignored needs to get them, so while they may help us as a franchise, they might not have much positive impact in 2008. I might also add that I think Jason Taylor could be available for a Day 2 pick. There are rumors that there was an agreement in place with Tampa Bay for the 52nd pick this year. With the selection of Merling, they might be ready to move on.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|