![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 176
|
you guys want the same guy that looked absolutely clueless in the MNF game against Dallas? He just turns the ball over and forces things
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#32 | |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Quote:
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,851
|
Quote:
I'll still take him over Ramsey at this point though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,851
|
Quote:
Last week most of us had Brunell's back, a week later everyone is throwing him under the bus. I don't get it. I assume if he were to rip it up against the Ravens next week he'd be the hero again. Hilarious! Ramsey is not the answer and flip flopping QB's is definitely not the answer. As long as Brunell is healthy enough to play, Gibbs is going to stick it out with him, so let's get off his back and stop crying for a QB change anytime something goes wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 481
|
As someone who is a Ramsey supporter, what has me upset about this whole situation is that it was obvious that Brunell was brought here for a win now approach. At 1-3 how realistic is the expectation of win now, i.e. making the playoffs?
For those of us who support Ramsey, it is added insult to injury that the team is not winning now we could just as easily be 1-3 with Ramsey, but at least he would be learning his craft as a QB. The Redskins overpaid for Brunell, and to make matters even worse they gave up a draft pick for him. If Brunell ends up being a bust, the team has given up a draft pick, and will have added dead cap money. As others have pointed out, and I have said this Gibbs will not take Brunell out. Ramsey, will have his growth and maturity as a QB stunted. So, what is next, do we trade Ramsey next year? Is Ramsey yet another wasted first round pick? From my point of view this is why the Brunell business ticks me off. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 61
Posts: 3,097
|
Quote:
Quote:
MY VOTE GOES TO RAMSEY! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
If it gets to the point where we arent going to make the playoffs, like a 1-6 , 2-7 or somthing really bad, we gotta put Ramsey in. For now, as much as I though he played like crap, I guess we got to stick with Brunell, basically I'm not gonna waste my time lobbying for Ramsey, I know Brunell is gonna stay in.
For everyone who is saying Brunell is doing everything asked of him, I ask him to lead us to a win next week. If he does that, I will be happy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
I think we should probably consider that Gibbs anticipated a possible slow start and saw that it would take time to get the players to understand and succesfully execute the plays on a consistent basis. As a veteran QB, I think Brunell is better suited to lead the team right now. While this team is struggling I don't see the benefit of putting Ramsey in there to take more beatings.
I see it as Brunell laying the foundation for Ramsey. In a year or so Ramsey will step into a polished offense. I think Ramsey has a very bright future, but I don't think he would be a better choice than Brunell right now. I don't think Brunell is the one costing us the games
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Offiss, you bring up a really interesting point in your post. I think as a whole the team is playing not to lose. I think that's a big reason for a lot of the mistakes, they're tentative. They think too much perhaps.
I absolutely agree that it'd be nice if they played to win. But I think that mentality comes from the coaching staff.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 176
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Let's take it down a notch. These posts are attacking other people, not the content.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 61
Posts: 3,097
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
if the skins are gonna keep pissing all the games away this year,i'd rather they do it with ramsey at qb than brunell.ramsey is the future of this team not the old man that got beat out by a rookie,then was way over paid to come to washington.redskinfan63 may think we who want ramsey to start are blind but if he cant see that brunell just aint got it no more than thats between him and his eye dr. if portis fumbles the ball one more time then the skins should bench his ass too,he wanted to be the highest paid player in the game, well he needs to effin earn his $ or take a seat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
correction,i left out big,it's bigredskinsfan63
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|