So what if Gardner DOES stay?

[jordanz301]

u kno wut i dunno about u guys i always really lieked him he makes awsome catches....he also has a bad work habit but hes the big widout i liek nd so does gibbs....i alos have a lot of interest in jacobs nd mcCants

[Daseal]

he also has a bad work habit

I guess that's why he consistantly stayed after practice and caught an extra 100-200 balls a day, that shitty work ethic of his. Rod Gardner isn't as bad as the media makes him look. He makes the easy balls look hard, and the hard balls look easy.

[Redskins_P]

Originally Posted by Daseal

I guess that's why he consistantly stayed after practice and caught an extra 100-200 balls a day, that shitty work ethic of his. Rod Gardner isn't as bad as the media makes him look. He makes the easy balls look hard, and the hard balls look easy.

What good did that do him? He stayed after practice and caught balls after practice, but yet he still had a hard time catching balls in games? He's just too inconsistent.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Redskins_P

What good did that do him? He stayed after practice and caught balls after practice, but yet he still had a hard time catching balls in games? He's just too inconsistent.

And I think ultimately that's what it comes down to, that no matter how hard he tries maybe Gardner just isn't that good.

[SKINZ_DOMIN8]

Originally Posted by Daseal

I guess that's why he consistantly stayed after practice and caught an extra 100-200 balls a day, that shitty work ethic of his. Rod Gardner isn't as bad as the media makes him look. He makes the easy balls look hard, and the hard balls look easy.

You are probably one of those "fans" that think Ramsey is the next Montana, right?

[BigSKINBauer]

Originally Posted by SKINZ_DOMIN8

You are probably one of those "fans" that think Ramsey is the next Montana, right?

deasel is prolly more realistic than that, i am just guessing though ,

seriously just read more than just one opinion before you assume.

when u assume u make an ASS out of U and ME
just words of advise not meant at all to be negitive

[BossHog]

Gibbs talks like Gardner will remain a 'Skin if we don't recieve equal value in a trade.

[EEich]

He'll be traded the next time Charles Rogers gets hurt.

[Daseal]

EEich - I'd take charles Rogers for Gardner straight up trade in a second.

[EEich]

So would I

[Daseal]

problem is we'll only have two of those mediocre WRs on the field at a time.

[TheMalcolmConnection]

So who WILL be the #1 when the season starts?

[EEich]

Vikings have no plans to trade for Gardner now.
http://www.startribune.com/stories/503/5329919.html

[Daseal]

I agree, Moss proved he can put up big numbers as the go to guy, he had a 1000 yard season and 10 TDs not too long ago.

So did Gardner, but you keep blowing that off, Matty. Only difference is he had only 8 TDs.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Daseal

So did Gardner, but you keep blowing that off, Matty. Only difference is he had only 8 TDs.

Gardner has also had 3 very inconsistent and very unspectacular seasons.

Seems like the pro-Gardner people blow that off more often than the anti-Gardner people blow off the one 1000 yard season he had.

He had one good season out of 4. Wow, I'm really impressed, even in baseball that's a crappy percentage.

When is it time to move on? I'd say 4 seasons is more than enough time to properly evaluate a player.

Last year was a disappointment for Moss because of injuries, but he STILL had a much better season than Gardner, and he also played in a conservative offense.