Pics For Sharing & Debating

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by Lotus

Your stupid sasquatch comments have no effect on me. I am neither a bigfoot hunter nor a bigfoot believer. I said as much here.

You continue to misconstrue my original comments, which were about scientific method. But since you have argued that science needs no evidence, no one here should be surprised that you continue to not know what science really is.

I apologize, I didn't realize it hurt your feelings so much.

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by Lotus

A) So in your own words, it is not PURELY personal gain. Thank you for making my point for me.

Nice edit, fraud. Oh, and you clearly haven't met POTUS's ego. If that's what drives him how would that NOT be personal gain?

Originally Posted by Lotus

B) The second point was elementary logic, which you obviously don't get, just like you don't understand scientific method.

It also follows that it CAN be either or it CAN be both.

I hope your students get the option of a refund, you're a complete fraud.

<point_laugh>

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

I hope your students get the option of a refund, you're a complete fraud.

<point_laugh>

Come on. That kind of attack really isn't needed. Stay classy.

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Come on. That kind of attack really isn't needed. Stay classy.

You argue your way, I'll argue mine.

Dude is a pompous POS with the fragile sensibilities of a maiden aunt.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

You argue your way, I'll argue mine.

Dude is a pompous POS with the fragile sensibilities of a maiden aunt.

That isn't arguing, that's just letting people know you lack the intelligence to actually put forth in a debate. Some of the best scientists/atheists in the world don't attack creationist when they debate them. They use logic and facts when debating them. When you resort to attacks, you simply lose all credibility and it devalues any good points you may have made.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

Nice edit, fraud. Oh, and you clearly haven't met POTUS's ego. If that's what drives him how would that NOT be personal gain?



It also follows that it CAN be either or it CAN be both.

I hope your students get the option of a refund, you're a complete fraud.

<point_laugh>

That's all I said: that it CAN BE both. I never said it WAS both, but you quoted me that way. I need not be concerned by words which you falsely put in my mouth.

It's not the first time that you wrongly put words in my mouth. Please know that if you have to stoop to misquoting me in order to win an argument, you are implicitly offering me a huge compliment. Thank you for that.

I would add that you know nothing about my professional life, so I need not worry about your opinions on that, either.

[Lotus]

[Lotus]

[Lotus]

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

What they are doing is 1,000,000 times worse. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't blackmailing congressmen either. Didn't Hoover do this exact same shit?

LOL, every time I read your shit or Rats I hear the theme music from the Twilight Zone .

You Tube

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by Lotus

It took two to tango over the "defunding Obamacare" budget.

If Obama and his allies cared about shutting down the government more than losing Obamacare, there would have been no shutdown. Instead the crisis was milked by the Obama administration for all it was worth.

With more spending increases passed during the crisis. (Excuse me, easing the sequestration cuts. ) Couldn't find a good picture of that, it doesn't fit the narrative being spun in the media every time there's a government crisis.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by HailGreen28

It took two to tango over the "defunding Obamacare" budget.

If Obama and his allies cared about shutting down the government more than losing Obamacare, there would have been no shutdown. Instead the crisis was milked by the Obama administration for all it was worth.

With more spending increases passed during the crisis. (Excuse me, easing the sequestration cuts. ) Couldn't find a good picture of that, it doesn't fit the narrative being spun in the media every time there's a government crisis.

Actually it did not take two to tango.

Some (not all) Capital Hill Republicans signed a letter in August which described their unilateral plan to shutdown the government if needed. Not only was there a unilateral plan, they put it in writing. Read more here;
Where the G.O.P.'s Suicide Caucus Lives : The New Yorker

I'm not sure how Obama can be blamed for someone else's written document.

Moreover, your line about how Obama cared less about the shutdown than he did about Obamacare misses a fundamental Constitutional point: The ACA is a law and the President is Constitutionally required to enact and defend laws. Put differently, even if Bush had been in the White House, he would have been Constitutionally required to endure the shutdown rather than scrapping the ACA.

But since we are blaming Obama for someone else's document and for defending the Constitution, I'll offer this:

[RedskinRat]

Obama defends the Constitution.......

Funniest thing you've ever posted.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

[Lotus]

Yeah, because it is impossible for Obama to violate the Constitution in one situation but protect it in a completely different situation. How hilarious.

[JoeRedskin]

Robots and computers. The answer is robots and computers.

... and cats. Robots, computers and cats.