Who for GM

mlmdub130 · 10-31-2009, 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Those things don't mean he'll be a great GM. Lebeau is great at one thing, coordinating defenses. He wasn't even a successful head coach (granted it was with the Bengals but still). It's like saying well Bugel would be a great GM. It doesn't quite work that way. Where is his experience in scouting players, managing a draft?

Personally I think a guy like Jimmy Raye III (Chargers) would be solid

this is true, thats why in my mind this is the MOST important position on a team, and you really never know you just have to bring them in and talk to them and see who will fit best for your/our team, and again that gets us back to that touchy little issue, and jr3 has done great in sd because they have had a couple pretty decent coaches, their names sound familiar too some guy named marty some thing or other and a guy named norv not quite as good as marty but not bad

rbanerjee23 · 10-31-2009, 12:57 AM

I'm still sold on Dungy coming in and taking one of the jobs either GM or coach, he would instantly bring this team back from the current brink of Raideritude

mlmdub130 · 10-31-2009, 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rbanerjee23

I'm still sold on Dungy coming in and taking one of the jobs either GM or coach, he would instantly bring this team back from the current brink of Raideritude

hate to dissapoint but dungy will....... never come to washington, he is way to smart and having way to much fun looking creepy on nbc football night in america(gayest show titile ever). but you have to admit he has a really creepy looking smile

Eknox · 10-31-2009, 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angry

1) Fire Vinny
2) Snyder gives me all decisions making abilities with the exception of his Madden Franchise. I'm sure that he turns the salary cap off and the Skins are awesome.
3) I cannot be terminated or over ruled in any decision until after my 5th season.
4) No more suing season ticket holders.
5) Access to training camp is free again.
6) First beer is free for all fans attending the game as long as they are wearing officially licensed Redskins Apparrell
7) I get a 5 member cheerleading squad in my luxury box.
8) I get to pick which 5.
9) My wife is banned from my luxury box.
10) I have a personal body guard to protect me from my wife.

LOL! Angry you got my vote man, can I hang out in the Luxury box?lol

RedskinMike · 10-31-2009, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlmdub130

this is true, thats why in my mind this is the MOST important position on a team, and you really never know you just have to bring them in and talk to them and see who will fit best for your/our team, and again that gets us back to that touchy little issue, and jr3 has done great in sd because they have had a couple pretty decent coaches, their names sound familiar too some guy named marty some thing or other and a guy named norv not quite as good as marty but not bad

By wanting to name a defensive coordinator GM and calling Norv a great coach your credibility is in question.

Beemnseven · 10-31-2009, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rbanerjee23

I'm still sold on Dungy coming in and taking one of the jobs either GM or coach, he would instantly bring this team back from the current brink of Raideritude

As for GM, what has "sold" you about Dungy?

I haven't seen anything which suggests he could excel at personnel decision-making, or drafting. Same goes for Mike Holmgren and Marty Schottenheimer. I'd like to know where the idea got started that great coaches are automatically going to be great general managers.

SmootSmack · 10-31-2009, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

As for GM, what has "sold" you about Dungy?

I haven't seen anything which suggests he could excel at personnel decision-making, or drafting. Same goes for Mike Holmgren and Marty Schottenheimer. I'd like to know where the idea got started that great coaches are automatically going to be great general managers.

Well Holmgren has had experience and some success already as a GM. I think Schottemheimer might actually be a better president than GM, you know more of a big picture guy. And that's kind of also why people think great coaches can make great GMs. They have that experience of overseeing almost a complete operation and they understand what it takes to have a successful team.

SBXVII · 10-31-2009, 10:44 AM

^Not only that Smoot but I'd rather have a proven GM who is good at his job but I imagine unless we throw the bank at them they won't leave their current team. Which means we are taking chances on someone who has no experience. I'd rather have a someone who knows and is proven to be able to build a team with talent. I could stomach Holmgren, but I'd rather have Schottenheimer. Only cause he has been here and knows what to expect and will put DS in his place if he tries to meddle.

Mostly I want a GM and HC who are on page with each other and know what type of players best fits the system they are trying to impliment. I believe part of our problems lie with VC having been more of a WC personel type and having Norv, Schottenhiemer, Spurrier, and Gibbs2 did not bode well together. We are finally running a WC style offense with non WC style players. Most likely given time things could turn around but Zorn has not shown me anything that would lead me to believe he has what it takes.

Perhaps part of it is cause he started out bad with the whole "Red, Black, and Yellow." It pointed out to me he obviously can't do a little homework on the internet. Oh I got excited when we were 6-2, but after it showed he can't conform to the talent he has. He reminds me of Surrier who basically said this is my offense run it. I understand injuries make it difficult but a great coach will learn quickly to tailor their scheme to fit their talent, ie; Gibbs1 when he went 0-5 and changed up his offense and went 8-8, Schottenhiemer who changed up after starting out bad and going 8-8. Zorn would prefer to stay the course with his offense and force a round peg into a squar hole, then say it's all about exicution.

Jamaican'Skin · 10-31-2009, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eknox

LOL! Angry you got my vote man, can I hang out in the Luxury box?lol

I'm sorry Ek, but as Angry's assistant general manger of player development and managerial indecent behavior, I'll actually be in the box with him. Thank you for your interest in joining us there though.

rbanerjee23 · 10-31-2009, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

As for GM, what has "sold" you about Dungy?

I haven't seen anything which suggests he could excel at personnel decision-making, or drafting. Same goes for Mike Holmgren and Marty Schottenheimer. I'd like to know where the idea got started that great coaches are automatically going to be great general managers.

Would he be a step up from VC? Yes, would any of those people be a step up from Vinny? Yes

I think that more than anything has sold me, call me crazy for wanting to get better if not necessarily the best...

Meks · 10-31-2009, 06:04 PM

again, jimmy johnson

WaldSkins · 10-31-2009, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rbanerjee23

I'm still sold on Dungy coming in and taking one of the jobs either GM or coach, he would instantly bring this team back from the current brink of Raideritude

If you want Dungy, he wants Tebow:
Dungy also had interesting comments on Tim Tebow. Dungy loves winners. He thinks Charlie Ward would have been a great NFL quarterback because he won at every level. Dungy said that Tebow is like that. He just wins, and that will translate to the NFL.

Dungy said if he ran St. Louis, he'd draft Tebow high in the first round. "Franchise quarterbacks are hard to fine, and I believe in this guy," Dungy said.

Dan asked Dungy if Sam Bradford, Colt McCoy, Jake Locker and Jimmy Clausen were available, would he take Tebow over all of them. Dungy said yes, he'd take Tebow.
Tony Dungy on Vince Young, drafting Tebow, Larry Johnson - Dan Patrick.com

SFREDSKIN · 10-31-2009, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Well Holmgren has had experience and some success already as a GM. I think Schottemheimer might actually be a better president than GM.

Yeah and then he'll bring the whole family, his son and brother. I'm sorry, but what has he done as far as winning a playoff game or even a SB to deserve such title with the Washington Redskins (this ain't Cleveland). If it was between Holmgren and Shottenheimer, I take Holmgren hands down, a proven winner all around. Heck, I would even take Marv "grandpa" Levy.

CultBrennan59 · 10-31-2009, 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WaldSkins

I've been throwing the name of Chris Polian around in other threads. So i'm sticking by my choice.

He should be a great GM, considering his father knows how to build teams

KLHJ2 · 11-01-2009, 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eknox

LOL! Angry you got my vote man, can I hang out in the Luxury box?lol

All Warpath members are invited into my luxery box. They just have to provide their own cheerleader or a woman equivalent of cheerleader status.

No daughters permitted.

10-31-2009, 12:57 AM	#47
rbanerjee23 The Starter Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 2,440	Re: Who for GM I'm still sold on Dungy coming in and taking one of the jobs either GM or coach, he would instantly bring this team back from the current brink of Raideritude __________________ "Tough times don't last but tough people do" -Mike Shanahan HTTR

10-31-2009, 10:44 AM	#53
SBXVII Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia Posts: 7,766	Re: Who for GM ^Not only that Smoot but I'd rather have a proven GM who is good at his job but I imagine unless we throw the bank at them they won't leave their current team. Which means we are taking chances on someone who has no experience. I'd rather have a someone who knows and is proven to be able to build a team with talent. I could stomach Holmgren, but I'd rather have Schottenheimer. Only cause he has been here and knows what to expect and will put DS in his place if he tries to meddle. Mostly I want a GM and HC who are on page with each other and know what type of players best fits the system they are trying to impliment. I believe part of our problems lie with VC having been more of a WC personel type and having Norv, Schottenhiemer, Spurrier, and Gibbs2 did not bode well together. We are finally running a WC style offense with non WC style players. Most likely given time things could turn around but Zorn has not shown me anything that would lead me to believe he has what it takes. Perhaps part of it is cause he started out bad with the whole "Red, Black, and Yellow." It pointed out to me he obviously can't do a little homework on the internet. Oh I got excited when we were 6-2, but after it showed he can't conform to the talent he has. He reminds me of Surrier who basically said this is my offense run it. I understand injuries make it difficult but a great coach will learn quickly to tailor their scheme to fit their talent, ie; Gibbs1 when he went 0-5 and changed up his offense and went 8-8, Schottenhiemer who changed up after starting out bad and going 8-8. Zorn would prefer to stay the course with his offense and force a round peg into a squar hole, then say it's all about exicution.

10-31-2009, 06:04 PM	#56
Meks Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: South Jersey Age: 40 Posts: 5,813	Re: Who for GM again, jimmy johnson __________________ R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR

Who for GM

Locker Room Main Forum