![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: OCEAN PINES, MD
Posts: 121
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Schefter and his crew of analysts are speculators. they're paid by espn to speculate. Essentially that's what passes for news these days. They need daily updates and the bigger the better. Why not? Bradford is going 1st overall!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 920
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Hmm.. If Bradford gets drafted #1, then Suh, and McCoy would get picked up, and we'd draft Okung or Davis. I'd be happy either way, although I think that we're going to end up with Bradford.
What ever happened to Bulger? He used to be so good, but I guess he just got injured the last 2 years.. Seems like he has interesting potential to become the next Kurt Warner - and resurrect his career. Or not. Ah well. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Shit, we need linemen of the highest caliber, not some hot shot Qb from a NCAA powerhouse that is totally overhyped. Come on now fellas, Oklahoma is a bigtime college football powerhouse that with the exception of playing Texas, T Tech, and a resurgent Nebraska, plays markedly inferior opponents just about every week. Their out of conference games are a total joke. A better than average QB could excel when you have the deck stacked in your favor. What is going to happen when Mr Bradford faces PARITY? If he is a future Ram, he is screwed since they suck. If he is a future Skin, he is better off, but is still going to face opponents that are evenly matched to his team. Think about this. Since the late 80's/early 90's1 only 3 Qbs that have garnered a ton of publicity(hype) from NCAA Div 1 A football have made a major impact in the NFL: Aikman, Peyton Manning, and McNabb. All 3 from good solid teams, but not the uber powerhouses. They faced tougher competition being on second tier teams, with less talent to back them up. Brees garnered some hype out of Purdue, but nothing like Bradford or McCoy are receiving. Same with Favre, Rivers, and Brady. All 3 solid QBs from the second tier(well Univ of Mich wasn't second tier back then) who faced superior opponents often or at least a lot of teams on par with them in terms of talent. I know the Big Ten is weak now, but when Brady was at Michigan it was still regarded as on par with the SEC as the premier conference in college football. The Big 12 was also weak this year in terms of overall competition.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
With that being said I don't think Brdofr is necessarily overrated in terms of ability, just I think his value is way overhyped. We need to get 3-5 linemen in the next two drafts of starting caliber and keep some of the present line for depth, but we need to get some studs in here. With a great line guys like Sean Canfield, Bill Stull, or even Kafka or Elliot could do well. Not to forget Lefevour or Sheehan from the MAC. We can get these guys in the middle to later rounds establish a solid line and in 2-3 seasons dominate. There are a ton of very good QBs out there. Why limit ourselves to just two possible selections?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
It doesn't seem like d tackles typically make a huge impact early on (regarding Suh). I don't think they "bust" like other positions, but for instance Raji fought through injury and just struggled to make an impact overall. Okoye (?) is sort of a similar story w/ the Texans. It really seems like it takes a few years for tackles to learn the tricks of the trade, the details, to become really dominant.
So I kind of see drafting Suh and Bradford similar in that you should expect a similar path of success...not immediate excellence. A team should draft on need all else being equal, and the Rams badly need a QB unless they try to build something about Vick or whatever.
__________________
24-34 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,178
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Hey Gus, are Miami , cincinatti , fsu and byu jokes? Lol OU actualy plays a very good out of conference schedule if u knew your facts. Not To mention they play in the 2nd toughest conference in the country.. Unlike the weak ass big 10 or PAC 10.
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 681
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
gosh do your homework guys...Clausen is the #1 rated QB in this draft.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
^21^
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Age: 53
Posts: 1,630
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
I want Okung. Bad.
__________________
^21^ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AFGHANISTAN
Posts: 335
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
I want a Blumpkin, followed by Okung... Davis sounds like a little bit of trouble.
__________________
Don't tase me bro!!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
I haven't seen a lot of Bradford but he seems similar to Bulger. I think Bulger can play but it seems that he just doesm't have enought pieces around him. Perhaps like JC he just needs a change of scenery.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,577
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Anybody thought about Bradford's possible chemistry with Malcolm Kelly? I'm not certain of this but I believe Bradford was a freshman the year before Kelly went pro. If they had a nice chemistry on the field that could mean good things for both Bradford if we end up picking him and for Kelly. Even though I like Campbell I definitely wouldn't mind taking Bradford.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
I think that on a team like the Giants Kelly could make his mark sooner than later, not that that's where we'd deal him, but they seem to do well. If we need to deal him to get something and bring in a Bryant or something fine, but I think that he just needs the chance to shine. He may not have done a lot yet, but you don't hear negatives about him either. He could end up being what Lloyd was SUPPOSED to be.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|