Be Bold 4/15/07

[Redskin Rich]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Yeah but you said rational and bold in your original post. Predicting 5-11 largely upon who our backup QB is might be bold, but really how rational is it?

Actually, you mis read me Smoot.... I said I don't think JC can get it done at this point and has no one behind him that can either.

[Redskin Rich]

Originally Posted by Redskin Rich

Actually, you mis read me Smoot.... I said I don't think JC can get it done at this point and has no one behind him that can either.

and we don't have a true deep threat WR that will scare the DB's... we have a GREAT number 2 acting as a 1

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Redskin Rich

Actually, you mis read me Smoot.... I said I don't think JC can get it done at this point and has no one behind him that can either.

Fair enough. As for the WR situation, I've brought this up in other threads about CJ, when you look at the best receivers in the league (Boldin, Chad Johnson, Harrison, Steve Smith, Andre Johnson) how many actually make their team better? I mean to get someone like Calvin Johnson would be exciting but does it make our team better? The last two games of the year it didn't look like we had any trouble putting points on the board. And if Saunders could score points with guys like Boeritger and Kennison at WR, why couldn't he with Moss and El?

[hooskins]

My apologies SmootSmack, I did not read Redskin Rich's previous posts.

My original assumption was NO injuries.

[Campbell17]

Depending on how we use our draft pick, I will say anywhere between 9-7 and 12-4. I'm thinking positive, 11-5.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by hooskins

So this is my new annual thread that I will create weekly or monthly(depending on my laziness). It is called "Be Bold". It is a quick and easy thread that will hopefully have a poll in the near future.

The object of the thread is to make a rational but bold prediction between two options. The first annual thread will be the projected record in 2007 barring injury to starters. It is always sexy and easy to pick 8-8 and around there. We will not pick that, but instead we will BE BOLD.

The Washington Redskins will go either:

A)6-10 and lower
OR
B)10-6 and higher

Answer below. Be Bold.

13-3 take that to the bank and obey your thirst and taste the rainbow

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

13-3 take that to the bank and obey your thirst and taste the rainbow

Are you a big Skittles and Sprite fan or something?

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by GMScud

Are you a big Skittles and Sprite fan or something?

yes i love skittles and sprite is ok but it is an inside joke

[KLHJ2]

I think everone knows my opinion on another wide receiver by now. No need to bring out the old banned sig.

[KLHJ2]

As long as we still have Cooley why do we need another Possession type of receiver?

[hooskins]

Originally Posted by angryssg

As long as we still have Cooley why do we need another Possession type of receiver?

No idea we are solid with Moss, El and Lloyd. Hell we dont even need Lloyd, Thrash is good enough. With Cooley and Betts as solid options for dumpoffs, our pass should look good.

I am only worried about our D.

[KLHJ2]

Originally Posted by hooskins

No idea we are solid with Moss, El and Lloyd. Hell we dont even need Lloyd, Thrash is good enough. With Cooley and Betts as solid options for dumpoffs, our pass should look good.

I am only worried about our D.

Likewise.

[TheMalcolmConnection]

In addition, Moss was hurt a majority of the year. What worries me is that this was his knock coming FROM the Jets. If he stays healthy, I feel more than confident he puts up 1200+ yards receiving.

[Sheriff Gonna Getcha]

With my prediction of an 8-8 record, I'm the definition of the overly cautious prognosticator.