Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


JC is not what I thought part two

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-30-2008, 11:08 PM   #61
T.O.Killa
The Starter
 
T.O.Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

I am starting to believe JC is the problem with the offense again. I just cant believe our recievers are the reason our offense has performed so bad. Where ever you have a good QB the recievers follow. I hope he starts to prove me wrong, just in time for the playoffs, but he has got me worried again.
T.O.Killa is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-30-2008, 11:10 PM   #62
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

$10 says that someone's head is going to spin 360 degrees and spit pea soup as soon as they see this thread has been bumped.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:11 PM   #63
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:14 PM   #64
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

oooo-line
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:15 PM   #65
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
I am starting to believe JC is the problem with the offense again. I just cant believe our recievers are the reason our offense has performed so bad. Where ever you have a good QB the recievers follow. I hope he starts to prove me wrong, just in time for the playoffs, but he has got me worried again.
So...you were wrong twice, but you're right now?

I agree that if Campbell was seeing everything, he would be making the receivers look good, but just because he isn't doesn't mean he's the big problem.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:17 PM   #66
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
So...you were wrong twice, but you're right now?
Please see my sig.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:19 PM   #67
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
Please see my sig.
I thought we all had enough of the QB carousel when Spurrier was here? I'm definitely a fan not in favor of yanking ANYONE right now. The Eagles tried that shit last week and got blown out of the water. Come on now..
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:22 PM   #68
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by DynamiteRave View Post
I thought we all had enough of the QB carousel when Spurrier was here? I'm definitely a fan not in favor of yanking ANYONE right now. The Eagles tried that shit last week and got blown out of the water. Come on now..
I realize you probably know my sig is dripping with sarcasm, but let me just confirm as much. I do not believe we should yank JC.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:23 PM   #69
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
I realize you probably know my sig is dripping with sarcasm, but let me just confirm as much. I do not believe we should yank JC.
Oh yeah. I know. I'm just bitching about how I don't know why anyone would want that.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:31 PM   #70
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
I realize you probably know my sig is dripping with sarcasm, but let me just confirm as much. I do not believe we should yank JC.
He is NOT our problem. First off, there were some AWFUL drops today, not to mention he's been harassed in the pocket all season.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:44 PM   #71
DesertHog
Camp Scrub
 
DesertHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 18
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

The jury is still out on Campbell but he has shown enough progression this season to give him a break for now.
DesertHog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:49 PM   #72
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

here is a crazy idea. how about let him be in the same system for more than one year?
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 12:07 AM   #73
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
here is a crazy idea. how about let him be in the same system for more than one year?
Crazy talk.

Bring in the next guy, if he doesn't turn out to be the next Brady or Manning by halfway through next season, toss him on the scrap heap too.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 12:08 AM   #74
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

When do I get my tryout for QB of the Redskins?

More importantly, when am I going to be called out for lacking heart?!
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 12:09 AM   #75
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
When do I get my tryout for QB of the Redskins?

More importantly, when am I going to be called out for lacking heart?!
When you lose, you don't have any heart.

When you win, you've got mad heart.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.78912 seconds with 10 queries