The Redskins' new approach to free agency

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Yeah but Duckett, Lloyd, Archuleta

More bad than good, no doubt, but we did get some value out of the FA haul that year, even though we wasted a lot of money.

[SeanTaylor21]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

2006 wasn't all bad, I mean ARE and Carter are going to justify the money they got to come here. And Todd Collins, to everyones surprise, is no schlub.

You forgot about the great Adam Archuleta.

[BeastsoftheNFCeast]

I dont even think ARE was worth the money

[SeanTaylor21]

Originally Posted by BeastsoftheNFCeast

I dont even think ARE was worth the money

Aside from ARE's punt returns, he did pretty good at wide reciever, most people expected like 500 yds out of him, and he ended up getting 700 yards.

[redsk1]

Originally Posted by BeastsoftheNFCeast

I dont even think ARE was worth the money

I like ARE but i'm not sure he's a #2 reciever. He really hasn't done alot w/ punt returns either, so you could call him overpaid.

[WaldSkins]

i still like the idea of trading for Roy Williams. Usually drafting a Wr in the first round doest merrit success. Trading a Second for Roy would be a much better option then drafting a Hardy with our first overall.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by WaldSkins

i still like the idea of trading for Roy Williams. Usually drafting a Wr in the first round doest merrit success. Trading a Second for Roy would be a much better option then drafting a Hardy with our first overall.

Why not just wait until next offseason when Williams is an unrestricted free agent?

[SeanTaylor21]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Why not just wait until next offseason when Williams is an unrestricted free agent?

I think it would be better if we just traded for him now, because we could just wait until the end of the year and see how he performed and based on the way he performed we either cut him, or resign him.

[WaldSkins]

Originally Posted by SeanTaylor21

I think it would be better if we just traded for him now, because we could just wait until the end of the year and see how he performed and based on the way he performed we either cut him, or resign him.

If we trade for him we would have first chance to sign him to a longer contract, If we waited till next year in free agency, we would have to outbid other teams for his services. Plus why wait to win when we could use him now.

[SeanTaylor21]

Originally Posted by WaldSkins

If we trade for him we would have first chance to sign him to a longer contract, If we waited till next year in free agency, we would have to outbid other teams for his services. Plus why wait to win when we could use him now.

So, are you agreeing or disagreeing with me?